BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Süreç Yeniliği Yapan Takımların Öğrenmesine Etki Eden Faktörler ve Yenilik Çalışmasının Başarısına Etkileri

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 17 - 31, 01.06.2007

İbrahim H. Seyrek Ali E. Akgün Gökhan Özer

Öz

Bu çalışmada 145 süreç yeniliği takımı üzerinde bir araştırma yapılmış ve süreç yeniliği yapan takımların öğrenmesine katkıda bulunan faktörler ve takım öğrenmesinin yenilik çalışmalarının başarısına etkileri tartışılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, takım vizyonu, bilgileri kaydetme ve gözden geçirme, dosyalama, yapısal bir geliştirme sürecini takip etme ve takım üyelerinin birbirine yakın mekanlarda çalışmaları öğrenmeyi ve proje başarısını olumlu olarak etkileyen faktörler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca öğrenmenin iki boyutu olan bilgi edinme ve bilginin uygulanmasının da proje başarısını olumlu olarak etkilediği görülmüştür

Anahtar Kelimeler

Süreç yeniliği Takımlar Takım öğrenmesi

Kaynakça

  • Alter, S. and Ginzberg, M. (1978). Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation. Sloan Management Review, Fall:87-95.
  • Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A. and Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(1):63-71.
  • Baker, B., Murphy, D. and Fisher, D. (1988). Factors Affecting Project Success. Project Management Handbook, 2nd ed. Van Norstand Reinhold Company, New York, pp. 902-919.
  • Boer, H. and During, W.E. (1987). Management of process innovation – the case of FMS: a systems approach. International Journal of Production Research, 25(11):1671-1682.
  • Boynton, A. and Zmud, R. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management Review, 25(4):17-27.
  • Cumming, B.S. (1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1):21-29.
  • Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, pp.2-3.
  • Druskat, V.U. and Kayes, C.K. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3):328-353.
  • Fui-Hoon Nah, F. and Lee-Shang Lau, J. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3):285-296.
  • Ginzberg, M.J. (1981). Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science, 27:459-478.
  • Goh, S. and Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. European Management Journal, 15:575-583.
  • Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36:13-14.
  • Kimberly, J.R. and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technical and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4):689-713.
  • Kasl, E., Marsick, V.J. and Dechant, K. (1997). Teams as learners: A research-based model for team learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(2):227-246.
  • Kay, J. (1993). Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.416.
  • Kiewra, K.A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of the processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20:23-32.
  • Kyle, L.P. and Hannafin, M.J. (1983). The effects of notetaking pretraining and the recording of notes on the retention of aural instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 77(2):100-107.
  • Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14:319- 340.
  • Lorentz, C. (1995). Process matters. Financial Times, October 13, p.10.
  • Lynn, G.S., Reilly, R. and Akgün, A.E. (2000). Knowledge management in new product teams: Practices and outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2):221-231.
  • Lynn, G.S., Skov, R.B. and Abel, K.D. (1999). Practices that support team learning and their impact to market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16:439-454.
  • Markus, L. and Keil, M. (1994). If we build it, will they come: Designing information systems that users want to use. Sloan Management Review, 35(4):11-25.
  • Meyers, P., Sivakumar, K. and Nakata, C. (1999). Implementation of industrial process innovations: Factors, effects, and marketing implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16:295-311.
  • Meyers, P.W. and Wilemon, D. (1989). Learning in new technology development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6:79-88.
  • Mitchell, V.L. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects. Organization Science, 10(4):424-438.
  • Motwani, J., Dandridge, T., Jiang, J. and Soderquist, K. (1999). Managing innovation in French small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, April:106-114.
  • Murmann, P.A. (1994). Expected development time reduction in the German mechanical engineering industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11:236-252.
  • Pinto, J. and Mantel, S. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4):269-275.
  • Ray, D.S. and Ray, E.J. (2000). Matching collaboration technologies to team needs: Accommodating document management and communication goals. Technical Communication, 47(1):122-126.
  • Russell, L. (1996). Reengineering: The mission links. Human Resource Planning, 19(4):40-47.
  • Sanders, R.L. (1999). The promise of project files: A case study. Information Management Journal, 33(1):64-66.
  • Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59:63-74.
  • Stephens, C. (1996). Reducing the risk of implementing new technologies. Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, 13(1):5-16.
  • Tidd, J., Bessant J. and Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley and Sons, p.6.
  • Whittaker, B. (1999). What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management and Computer Security, 7(1):23-29.

Factors Affecting Process Innovation Teams’ Learning and Their Impact on the Success of the Process Innovation Projects

Yıl 2007, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 17 - 31, 01.06.2007

İbrahim H. Seyrek Ali E. Akgün Gökhan Özer

Öz

Based on 145 process innovation teams, we have studied factors supporting team learning and their impact on the success of the process innovation projects. As a result, we have found that team vision, recording and reviewing project related information, filing, following a structural development process and co-location of team members are factors supporting team learning and project success. Also, two dimensions of learning, information acquisition and information implementation, are positively related to the success of the process innovation projects

Anahtar Kelimeler

Process innovation Teams Team learning

Kaynakça

  • Alter, S. and Ginzberg, M. (1978). Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation. Sloan Management Review, Fall:87-95.
  • Bacon, D.R., Stewart, K.A. and Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20(1):63-71.
  • Baker, B., Murphy, D. and Fisher, D. (1988). Factors Affecting Project Success. Project Management Handbook, 2nd ed. Van Norstand Reinhold Company, New York, pp. 902-919.
  • Boer, H. and During, W.E. (1987). Management of process innovation – the case of FMS: a systems approach. International Journal of Production Research, 25(11):1671-1682.
  • Boynton, A. and Zmud, R. (1984). An assessment of critical success factors. Sloan Management Review, 25(4):17-27.
  • Cumming, B.S. (1998). Innovation overview and future challenges. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1):21-29.
  • Davenport, T.H. (1993). Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts, pp.2-3.
  • Druskat, V.U. and Kayes, C.K. (2000). Learning versus performance in short-term project teams. Small Group Research, 31(3):328-353.
  • Fui-Hoon Nah, F. and Lee-Shang Lau, J. (2001). Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems. Business Process Management Journal, 7(3):285-296.
  • Ginzberg, M.J. (1981). Early diagnosis of MIS implementation failure: Promising results and unanswered questions. Management Science, 27:459-478.
  • Goh, S. and Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. European Management Journal, 15:575-583.
  • Hartley, J. (1983). Notetaking research: Resetting the scoreboard. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 36:13-14.
  • Kimberly, J.R. and Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technical and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4):689-713.
  • Kasl, E., Marsick, V.J. and Dechant, K. (1997). Teams as learners: A research-based model for team learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33(2):227-246.
  • Kay, J. (1993). Foundations of Corporate Success: How Business Strategies Add Value. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p.416.
  • Kiewra, K.A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of the processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20:23-32.
  • Kyle, L.P. and Hannafin, M.J. (1983). The effects of notetaking pretraining and the recording of notes on the retention of aural instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 77(2):100-107.
  • Levitt, B. and March, J.G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14:319- 340.
  • Lorentz, C. (1995). Process matters. Financial Times, October 13, p.10.
  • Lynn, G.S., Reilly, R. and Akgün, A.E. (2000). Knowledge management in new product teams: Practices and outcomes. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(2):221-231.
  • Lynn, G.S., Skov, R.B. and Abel, K.D. (1999). Practices that support team learning and their impact to market and new product success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16:439-454.
  • Markus, L. and Keil, M. (1994). If we build it, will they come: Designing information systems that users want to use. Sloan Management Review, 35(4):11-25.
  • Meyers, P., Sivakumar, K. and Nakata, C. (1999). Implementation of industrial process innovations: Factors, effects, and marketing implications. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16:295-311.
  • Meyers, P.W. and Wilemon, D. (1989). Learning in new technology development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6:79-88.
  • Mitchell, V.L. and Zmud, R.W. (1999). The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects. Organization Science, 10(4):424-438.
  • Motwani, J., Dandridge, T., Jiang, J. and Soderquist, K. (1999). Managing innovation in French small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, April:106-114.
  • Murmann, P.A. (1994). Expected development time reduction in the German mechanical engineering industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11:236-252.
  • Pinto, J. and Mantel, S. (1990). The causes of project failure. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 37(4):269-275.
  • Ray, D.S. and Ray, E.J. (2000). Matching collaboration technologies to team needs: Accommodating document management and communication goals. Technical Communication, 47(1):122-126.
  • Russell, L. (1996). Reengineering: The mission links. Human Resource Planning, 19(4):40-47.
  • Sanders, R.L. (1999). The promise of project files: A case study. Information Management Journal, 33(1):64-66.
  • Slater, S.F. and Narver, J.C. (1995). Market orientation and the learning organization. Journal of Marketing, 59:63-74.
  • Stephens, C. (1996). Reducing the risk of implementing new technologies. Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, 13(1):5-16.
  • Tidd, J., Bessant J. and Pavitt, K. (1997). Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change. John Wiley and Sons, p.6.
  • Whittaker, B. (1999). What went wrong? Unsuccessful information technology projects. Information Management and Computer Security, 7(1):23-29.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA28GR53FR
Bölüm Makale
Yazarlar

İbrahim H. Seyrek Bu kişi benim

Ali E. Akgün Bu kişi benim

Gökhan Özer Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2007
Gönderilme Tarihi 1 Haziran 2007
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2007 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Seyrek, İ. H., Akgün, A. E., & Özer, G. (2007). Factors Affecting Process Innovation Teams’ Learning and Their Impact on the Success of the Process Innovation Projects. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 17-31.