Year 2015, Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 1047 - 1064 2015-09-15

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ
ROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ ACHIEVEMENT GOALS, LEARNING STRATEGIES AND ENGAGEMENT IN LESSONS: A MEDIATION ANALYSIS

Güler DUMAN [1] , Altay EREN [2]

244 1175

Bu araştırmanın amacı iki yönlüdür. Birincisi, öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçları, öğrenme stratejileri ve derse katılımları arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi; ikincisi ise, başarı amaçlarıyla derse katılımları arasındaki ilişkilerde öğrenme stratejilerinin arabuluculuk rollerinin sorgulanmasıdır. Araştırmada, açıklayıcı ilişkisel desen benimsenmiştir. Araştırmaya toplam 312 öğretmen adayı gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçları, öğretmen adaylarının başarı amaçlarının, öğrenme stratejilerinin ve derse katılımlarının birbirleriyle anlamlı düzeyde ilişkilendiğini göstermiştir. Sonuçlar ayrıca, öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stratejilerinin başarı amaçlarıyla derse katılımları arasındaki ilişkilerde anlamlı arabuluculuk rolleri oynadığını da göstermiştir. Araştırmada, öğretmen eğitimine ve gelecekte yapılabilecek araştırmalara ilişkin önerilere de yer verilmiştir.
The purpose of the present study is twofold. First, it is to examine the relationships between prospective teachers’ achievement goals, learning strategies, and engagement in lessons; and second, it is to investigate the mediating roles of prospective teachers’ learning strategies in the relationships between their achievement goals and engagement in lessons. An explanatory correlational design was adopted in the study. A total of 312 prospective teachers participated voluntarily in the study. The results demonstrated that the prospective teachers’ achievement goals, learning strategies, and engagement in lessons were significantly related to each other. The results also showed that the relationships between the prospective teachers’ achievement goals and engagement in lessons were significantly mediated by their learning strategies. Implications for teacher education and directions for future studies were also discussed in the study.
  • Ainley, M. (1993). Styles of engagement with learning: multidimensional assessment of their rela- tionships with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 395-405.
  • Alkan, C. (2000). 2000’li yıllarda öğretmenlik mesleğinin yeniden yapılandırılması ve öğretmen adaylarının yetiştirilmesi. Çağdaş Eğitim Dergisi, 25(271), 12-14.
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction insocial psycho- logical research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51,1173-1182.
  • Berger, J. L. & Karabenic, S. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21, 416-428.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Özkahveci, Ö., & Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve öğrenme stra- tejileri ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 207-239.
  • Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical As- sessment, Research and Evaluation, 13(8).
  • Chen, C. S. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to informa- tion systems course. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, 20(1), 11-25
  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
  • Demir, Ö., & Doğanay, A. (2010). Bilişsel koçluk yöntemiyle öğretilen bilişsel farkındalık stra- tejilerinin altıncı sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde öğrencilerin epistemolojik inançlarına, bilişsel farkındalık becerilerine, akademik başarılarına ve bunların kalıcılıklarına etkisi. İlköğretim On- line, 9(1), 106-127.
  • Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, & achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contem- porary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43-59.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
  • Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psy- chologist, 34, 169–189.
  • Elliot, E.S. & Church, M.A. (1997). A hierarchal model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2× 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Persona- lity and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
  • Eren, A. (2008). Üniversite öğrencilerinin başarı amaçları ve zihinsel zaman yolculuğu becerileri. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 7(14), 157–175.
  • Eren, A. (2013). Prospective teachers’ perceptions of instrumentality, boredom coping strategies, & four aspects of engagement. Teaching Education, 24(3), 302-326.
  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: how do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 697-705) New York, NY: Copublished by Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage Publications.
  • Finn, J. D. & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to student engagement. Journal of Negro Education 62(3), 249-268.
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the con- cept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1),59-109.
  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The effects of autonomy on motivation and performance in the college classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 477-486.
  • Gonida, E. N., Voulala, K., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2009). Students’ achievement goal orientations and their behavioral and emotional engagement: Co-examining the role of perceived school goal structures and parent goals during adolescence. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 53-60.
  • Grossman, G. M., & Sands, M. (2008). Restructuring reforms in Turkish teacher education: Mo- dernisation and development in a dynamic environment. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 70-80.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating source. Journal of Educational Psycho- logy, 94, 638–645.
  • Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 376-386.
  • Kaplan, A. & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Edu- cational Psychology, 24(4), 330-358.
  • Lynch, D. J. (2010). Motivational beliefs and learning strategies as predictors of academic perfor- mance in college physics. College Student Journal, 44(4), 920-928.
  • Marshall, H. H., & Weinstein, R. S. (1984). Classroom factors affecting students’ self-evaluations: An interactional model. Review of Educational Research, 54(3), 301-325.
  • McMahon, B. & Portelli, J. P. (2004). Engagement for what? Beyond popular discourses of student engagement. Leadership & Policy in Schools,3(1), 59-76.
  • McMahon, B. J. & Zyngier, D. (2009). Student engagement: contested concepts in two continents. Research in Comparative & International Education,4(2), 164-181.
  • Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514-523.
  • Murphy, K. R., & Davidshofer, C. O. (1998). Psychological testing (4th ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Mustan, T. (2002). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Yeni Yaklaşımlar. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(1), 115-127.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328–346.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.
  • Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Education at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing.
  • Phan, H. P. (2009). Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 155-173.
  • Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learn- ing and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.
  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.
  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
  • Potts, B. (1994). Strategies for teaching critical thinking. Washington, OC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
  • Régner, I., Escribe, C., & Dupeyrat, C. (2007). Evidence of social comparison in mastery goals in natural academic settings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 575-583.
  • Reeve, J. & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267.
  • Senler, B., & Sungur, S. (2007). Hedef yönelimi anketinin Türkçe’ye çevrilmesi ve adaptasyonu. Ulusal Ilkogretim Kongresi, Ankara.
  • Silva, A. M., & Herdeiro, R. (2013). The work, perceptions and professional development of teac- hers. Teaching Education, (in press article), 1-18.
  • Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teac- her behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psycho- logy, 85(4), 571.
  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engage- ment and disaffection conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measure- ment, 69(3), 493-525.
  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equationsmodels. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). SanFrancisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Somuncuoglu, Y., & Yildirim, A. (1999). Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(5), 267-277.
  • Stefanou, C. R., & Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. (2002). Developing motivation and cognitive lear- ning strategies through an undergraduate learning community. Learning Environments Rese- arch, 5(1), 77-97.
  • Tinnesz, C. G., Ahuna, K. H., & Kiener, M. (2006). Toward college success: Internalizing active and dynamic strategies. College Teaching, 54(4), 302-306.
  • Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. J. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3(2), 123-146.
  • Vural, L. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının çalışmalarında yaşadıkları öğrenme sorunları ve kullandık- ları öğrenme stratejileri. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1), 46-65.
  • Walker, C. O., & Greene, B. A. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 463-472.
  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3, 315-327.
  • Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Engaged and disaffected action: The conceptualization and measurement of motivation in the academic domain. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. University of Rochester, Rochester.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236–250.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
Other ID JA43AE76CN
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author: Güler DUMAN
Institution: ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ

Author: Altay EREN
Institution: ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, EĞİTİM BİLİMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ

Bibtex @ { kefdergi241395, journal = {Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi}, issn = {}, eissn = {2147-9844}, address = {Kastamonu University}, year = {2015}, volume = {23}, pages = {1047 - 1064}, doi = {}, title = {ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ}, key = {cite}, author = {DUMAN, Güler and EREN, Altay} }
APA DUMAN, G , EREN, A . (2015). ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 23 (3), 1047-1064. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/kefdergi/issue/22598/241395
MLA DUMAN, G , EREN, A . "ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 23 (2015): 1047-1064 <http://dergipark.org.tr/kefdergi/issue/22598/241395>
Chicago DUMAN, G , EREN, A . "ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 23 (2015): 1047-1064
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ AU - Güler DUMAN , Altay EREN Y1 - 2015 PY - 2015 N1 - DO - T2 - Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 1047 EP - 1064 VL - 23 IS - 3 SN - -2147-9844 M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Kastamonu Education Journal ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ %A Güler DUMAN , Altay EREN %T ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ %D 2015 %J Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi %P -2147-9844 %V 23 %N 3 %R %U
ISNAD DUMAN, Güler , EREN, Altay . "ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ BAŞARI AMAÇLARI, ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİ VE DERSLERE KATILIMLARI: BİR ARABULUCULUK ANALİZİ". Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 23 / 3 (September 2015): 1047-1064.