Bireysel Performansta Sosyal Kimlik Bileşenleri ve Davranışsal Niyetin Rolü: Akademisyenler Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 2, 133 - 145, 29.04.2019

Fatih Çetin Muhammet Ali Çelebi

https://doi.org/10.25287/ohuiibf.531294

Cited By: 2

Öz

Mevcut çalışmada, sosyal kimliğin bilişsel, duygusal ve
değerlendirmeye dayalı alt boyutlarının rol-içi ve rol-dışı performansa olan
etkileri ve davranışsal niyetin bu süreçte bir aracılık rolü olup olmadığı araştırılmıştır.
Araştırma 592 akademik personel üzerinden kolayda anket yöntemiyle toplanan
veriler üzerinden yürütülmüştür. Değişkenler arasındaki etkileşimler için
yapısal eşitlik modeli kurulmuş, modeldeki aracılık rolleri için dolayı
etkilerin anlamlılığına bakılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda rol performansını yalnızca
sosyal kimliğin değerlendirme alt boyutundaki önem hissini
etkilediği, rol-dışı performansın sosyal
kimliğin bilişsel alt boyutundaki çalışma arkadaşlarıyla olan ilişkileri
etkilediği, sosyal kimliğin duygusal alt
boyutlarından bağlılığın davranışsal niyeti etkilediği ancak davranışsal
niyetin bu süreçte bir aracılık rolünün olmadığı ortaya çıkarılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Kimlik, Örgütsel Kimlik, Davranışsal Katılım, Bireysel Performans

Social Identity Components in Individual Performance and The Role of Behavioral Intention: A Research on Academicians

Öz

In the present study. the role of cognitive. emotional
and evaluative social identity on in-role and extra-role performance and the mediating
role of behavioral intention in these interactions were investigated. The
research was conducted on the data collected from 592 academic staff with a convenience
survey method. For the interactions between variables. a structural equation
model was established. and the significance of the indirect effects was
examined for the mediating roles in the model. Findings show that the sense of significance
as the evaluative sub-dimension of social identity has an impact on role
performance. the relationship with the colleagues as the cognitive sub-dimension
of social identity has an impact on extra-role performance. the commitment as
the affective sub-dimension of social identity has an impact on behavioral intention
without any moderating roles of behavioral intention in these processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Social Identity, Organizational Identity, Behavioral Intention, Individual Performance

Kaynakça

• Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2010). Social identity and self-categorization. In J. F. Dovidio M. Hewstone & P. Glick (Ed.). In The SAGE Handbook of Prejudice. Stereotyping and Discrimination (pp. 179–193). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200919.n11
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. http://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.ObO13e31812e5535
• Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe. T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80.
• Bagozzi, R. P., & Lee, K. H. (2002). Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 226-247.
• Bergami, M., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self‐categorization, affective commitment and group self‐esteem as distinct aspects of social identity in the organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
• Borman, W. C., & Motowildo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002
• Burke, P. J., & Reitzes, D. C. (1981). The link between identity and role performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(2), 83-92.
• Burke, P. J., & Tully, J. C. (1977). The measurement of role identity. Social Forces, 55(4), 881-897.
• Demerouti, E., Xanthopoulou. D., Tsaousis. I., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Disentangling task and contextual performance: a multitrait-multimethod approach. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 13(2), 59–69. http://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000104
• Deschamps, J., & Devos, T. (1998). Regarding the relationship between social identity and personal identity. In S. WorchelJ. F. Morales & D. Páez (Eds.). Social identity: International Perspectives (pp. 2-12). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. doi: 10.4135/9781446279205.n1.
• Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self‐categorization, commitment to the group and group self‐esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2‐3), 371-389.
• Feitosa, J., Salas, E., & Salazar, M. R. (2012). Social identity: Clarifying its dimensions across cultures. Psihologijske Teme, 21(3), 527-548.
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
• Fishbein, M., (2007), A Reasoned Action Approach: Some Issues, Questions and Clarifications. In. I. Ajzen, D. Albarracin, R. Hornik (Eds.) Prediction and Change of Health Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum, 277-291.
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Neale, M. (2000). The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: investigating the role of situational constraints. Applied Psychology An International Review, 49(3), 517–533. http://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00029
• Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. http://www.jstor.org/stable/259266
• Janssen, O., & Huang, X. (2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members' citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34, 69-88.
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74. https://www.jstor.org/stable/256874
• Lee, E. S., Park. T. Y., & Koo. B. (2015). Identifying organizational identification as a basis for attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 1049–1080. http://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000012
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
• Pasley, K., Futris, T. G., & Skinner, M. L. (2002). Effects of commitment and psychological centrality on fathering. Journal of Marriage and Family. 64(1). 130-138.
• Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259262
• Settoon, R. P., & Mossholder, K. W. (2002). Relationship quality and relationship context as antecedents of person-and task-focused interpersonal citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 255-267.
• Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: Examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27–52. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0
• Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent. overlapping. or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 16-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2786972
• Sonnentag, S., Volmer. J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior Volume One: Micro Approaches, Vol, 1, 427–447. SAGE Publications Ltd. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200455
• Stoner, J., Perrewé. P. L., & Hofacker, C. (2011). The development and validation of the multi-mimensional identification scale (MDIS). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1632–1658. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00770.x
• Tajfel, H. (1972). Social categorization (English translation of "La categorisation sociale"). In S. Moscovici (Ed.), Introduction a la psychologie sociale, vol. 1: 272-302. Paris: Larousse.
• Van Dick, R. (2004). My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts. In. C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Ed.) International Review of Industrial and Organizational (Volume 19). John Wiley & Sons. Ltd.
• Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 357-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00020
• Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525–531. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525