Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 150 - 154, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: the case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 89-105.
  • Bickart, B., Schindler R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15, 3, 31-40.
  • Bowman, D., Narayandas D. (2001). Managing customer- initiated contacts with manufacturers: the impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 3, 281-297.
  • Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Advancing and consolidating knowledge about customer engagement. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 283-284.
  • Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 2, 123-138.
  • Chung, C. M. Y., Darke, R. (2006). The consumer as advocate: self-relevance, culture and word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 17, 4, 269-279.
  • Doyle, P. (2008). Value-based marketing. United Kingdom: John Wiley&Sons, 2. Edition.
  • Fang, C. H., Lin, T. M. Y., Liu, F., Lin Y. H. (2011). Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5, 2, 189-202.
  • Gildin, S. Z. (2003). Understanding the power of word-of-mouth. Revista de Adminitracao Mackenzie, 4, 1, 91-106.
  • Goldsmith, R. E., Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 6, 2, 2-14.
  • Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., Marticotte, F. (2010). e‐WoM scale: word‐of‐mouth measurement scale for services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27, 1, 5–23.
  • Gu, B., Park, J., Konana, P. (2012). The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23, 1, 182–196.
  • Ha, H-Y. (2004). Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13, 5, 329-342.
  • Killian, G., McManus K. (2015). A marketing communications approach for the digital era: managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58, 5, 539-549.
  • Kozinets, R. V., Valck, K., Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2, 71-89.
  • Lam, D., Mizerski, D. (2005). The effects of locus of control on word of mouth communication. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11, 3, 215- 228.
  • Lang, B. (2011). How word of mouth communication varies across service encounters. Managing Service Quality, 21, 6, 583-598.
  • Mangold, W. G., Miller, F. Brockway, G. R. (1999). Word-of-mouth communication in the service marketplace. The Journal of Service Marketing, 13, 1, 73-89.
  • Pansari, A., Kumar, V. (2017). Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 294-311. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6
  • Ferguson, R. J., Paulin, M., Bergeron, J. (2010). Customer sociability and the total service experience: antecedents of positive word‐of‐mouth intentions. Journal of Service Management, Vol. 21 Issue: 1, pp.25-44, https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231011025100
  • File, K. M., Judd, B. B., Prince, R. A. (1992). Interactive marketing: the influence of participation on positive word‐of‐mouth and referrals. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 6 Issue: 4, pp.5-14, https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049210037113
  • Pandir, B., Yasin, B. (2017). Brand love and customer engagement’s role over brand loyalty. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML), V.4, Iss.4, p.359-365.
  • Porter, M. E., Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.
  • Ranaweera, C., Prabhu, J. (2003). The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2003, 14, 4, 374-395.
  • Ng, S., David, M. E., Dagger, T. S. (2011). Generating positive word‐of‐mouth in the service experience. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 21 Issue: 2, pp.133-151, https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111113438
  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of service research, 13(3), 253-266.
  • Verhoef, P. C., Reinartz, W. J., Krafft, M. (2010). Customer engagement as a new perspective in customer management. Journal of service research, 13(3), 247-252.
  • Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 122-146.
  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987 ,24 ,3, 258-270.
  • Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1336-1341.

CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 150 - 154, 01.09.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871

Öz

Purpose- In this research, researchers have aimed to test relations and roles between customer engagement and positive word-of-mouth intention.

Methodology- This research is a descriptive study and includes the scales of customer engagement and positive word-of-mouth intention which were translated into Turkish and also socio-economic, demographic questions and usage habits. By help of these scales, a survey was formed and applied as an online survey.

Findings- It has been found that there is a significance correlation(Sig=0,00<0.05) between customer engagement and positive word-of-mouth of intention and the output Pearson Correlation Constant was 0.44. Additionally, there are significant differences in usage habits.

Conclusion- It can be interpreted that there is a positive but weak correlation between customer engagement and positive word-of-mouth intention.

Kaynakça

  • Arnett, D. B., German, S. D., Hunt, S. D. (2003). The identity salience model of relationship marketing success: the case of nonprofit marketing. Journal of marketing, 67(2), 89-105.
  • Bickart, B., Schindler R. M. (2001). Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15, 3, 31-40.
  • Bowman, D., Narayandas D. (2001). Managing customer- initiated contacts with manufacturers: the impact on share of category requirements and word-of-mouth behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 3, 281-297.
  • Brodie, R. J., Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Advancing and consolidating knowledge about customer engagement. Journal of Service Research, 14(3), 283-284.
  • Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33, 2, 123-138.
  • Chung, C. M. Y., Darke, R. (2006). The consumer as advocate: self-relevance, culture and word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters, 17, 4, 269-279.
  • Doyle, P. (2008). Value-based marketing. United Kingdom: John Wiley&Sons, 2. Edition.
  • Fang, C. H., Lin, T. M. Y., Liu, F., Lin Y. H. (2011). Product type and word of mouth: a dyadic perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 5, 2, 189-202.
  • Gildin, S. Z. (2003). Understanding the power of word-of-mouth. Revista de Adminitracao Mackenzie, 4, 1, 91-106.
  • Goldsmith, R. E., Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 6, 2, 2-14.
  • Goyette, I., Ricard, L., Bergeron, J., Marticotte, F. (2010). e‐WoM scale: word‐of‐mouth measurement scale for services context. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 27, 1, 5–23.
  • Gu, B., Park, J., Konana, P. (2012). The impact of external word-of-mouth sources on retailer sales of high-involvement products. Information Systems Research, 2012, 23, 1, 182–196.
  • Ha, H-Y. (2004). Factors influencing consumer perceptions of brand trust online. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 13, 5, 329-342.
  • Killian, G., McManus K. (2015). A marketing communications approach for the digital era: managerial guidelines for social media integration. Business Horizons, 58, 5, 539-549.
  • Kozinets, R. V., Valck, K., Wilner, S. J. (2010). Networked narratives: understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74, 2, 71-89.
  • Lam, D., Mizerski, D. (2005). The effects of locus of control on word of mouth communication. Journal of Marketing Communications, 11, 3, 215- 228.
  • Lang, B. (2011). How word of mouth communication varies across service encounters. Managing Service Quality, 21, 6, 583-598.
  • Mangold, W. G., Miller, F. Brockway, G. R. (1999). Word-of-mouth communication in the service marketplace. The Journal of Service Marketing, 13, 1, 73-89.
  • Pansari, A., Kumar, V. (2017). Customer engagement: the construct, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(3), 294-311. doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0485-6
  • Ferguson, R. J., Paulin, M., Bergeron, J. (2010). Customer sociability and the total service experience: antecedents of positive word‐of‐mouth intentions. Journal of Service Management, Vol. 21 Issue: 1, pp.25-44, https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231011025100
  • File, K. M., Judd, B. B., Prince, R. A. (1992). Interactive marketing: the influence of participation on positive word‐of‐mouth and referrals. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 6 Issue: 4, pp.5-14, https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049210037113
  • Pandir, B., Yasin, B. (2017). Brand love and customer engagement’s role over brand loyalty. Journal of Management, Marketing and Logistics (JMML), V.4, Iss.4, p.359-365.
  • Porter, M. E., Heppelmann, J. E. (2014). How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, 92(11), 64-88.
  • Ranaweera, C., Prabhu, J. (2003). The influence of satisfaction, trust and switching barriers on customer retention in a continuous purchasing setting. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 2003, 14, 4, 374-395.
  • Ng, S., David, M. E., Dagger, T. S. (2011). Generating positive word‐of‐mouth in the service experience. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 21 Issue: 2, pp.133-151, https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111113438
  • Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of service research, 13(3), 253-266.
  • Verhoef, P. C., Reinartz, W. J., Krafft, M. (2010). Customer engagement as a new perspective in customer management. Journal of service research, 13(3), 247-252.
  • Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 122-146.
  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 1987 ,24 ,3, 258-270.
  • Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63, 1336-1341.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Berker Pandir Bu kişi benim 0000-0003-3869-2244

Ebru Enginkaya 0000-0003-1137-3470

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Eylül 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Pandir, B., & Enginkaya, E. (2018). CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR. PressAcademia Procedia, 7(1), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871
AMA Pandir B, Enginkaya E. CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR. PAP. Eylül 2018;7(1):150-154. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871
Chicago Pandir, Berker, ve Ebru Enginkaya. “CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR”. PressAcademia Procedia 7, sy. 1 (Eylül 2018): 150-54. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871.
EndNote Pandir B, Enginkaya E (01 Eylül 2018) CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR. PressAcademia Procedia 7 1 150–154.
IEEE B. Pandir ve E. Enginkaya, “CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR”, PAP, c. 7, sy. 1, ss. 150–154, 2018, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871.
ISNAD Pandir, Berker - Enginkaya, Ebru. “CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR”. PressAcademia Procedia 7/1 (Eylül 2018), 150-154. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871.
JAMA Pandir B, Enginkaya E. CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR. PAP. 2018;7:150–154.
MLA Pandir, Berker ve Ebru Enginkaya. “CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR”. PressAcademia Procedia, c. 7, sy. 1, 2018, ss. 150-4, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.871.
Vancouver Pandir B, Enginkaya E. CUSTOMER ENGAGEMENT’S ROLE OVER POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH INTENTION: A STUDY ON SMARTPHONES SECTOR. PAP. 2018;7(1):150-4.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.