CAN MARKET FAILURE EXPLAIN THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLICLY FUNDED BROADCASTING SERVICE IN THE DIGITAL ERA?

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 16, 213 - 234, 31.12.2018

İbrahim Yılmaz

Öz

Son yıllarda meydana gelen teknolojik gelişmeler televizyon yayıncılığı
piyasası üzerinde önemli etkilere sahip olmuştur. Bu çarpıcı gelişmenin etkisi
altında olan yayın sinyali iletim metodları değişime uğramıştır. Sınıflandırma
olarak, televizyon yayıncılığı tam kamusal maldan klüp mala dönüşmekte ve
digital çağda sifreleme sistemi hükümetlere negatif dışsallıkların üstesinden
gelmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Yayıncılık spektrumları eskisi kadar kıt
değildir. Bu yüzden, dijital çağda meydana gelen teknolojik gelişmelerden
ötürü, piyasa başarısızlığı yaklaşımı kamusal televizyon yayıncılığının
açıklanmasında meşru bir gerekçe olarak ileri sürülmemelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kamusal televizyon yayıncılığı, piyasa başarısızlığı, dışsallık

CAN MARKET FAILURE EXPLAIN THE EXISTENCE OF PUBLICLY FUNDED BROADCASTING SERVICE IN THE DIGITAL ERA?

Öz

Over the last few decades, technological developments have had a
considerable impact on the broadcasting market. The methods of transmission
have altered where broadcasting signals have been subject to dramatic
enhancements. In terms of classification, broadcasting shifted from a pure
public good to a club good and in the digital era, encryption enables
governments to deal with negative externalities in the broadcasting market. In
fact, broadcasting spectrums are not as scarce as previously experienced, thus,
due to technological developments, the market failure framework cannot be
considered as a legitimate rationale for publicly funded broadcasting services
in the digital era.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Publicly funded broadcasting service, market failure, public good, externalities

Kaynakça

• Armstrong, M. (2005). Public Service Broadcasting. Fiscal Studies, 26 (3), 281-299.
• Armstrong, M. & Weeds, H. (2007). Public Service Broadcassting in the Digital World. In Seabright, P. & Hagen, J. V. (Eds). The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy (81-149). Cambridge University Press.
• Barr, N. A. (2001). The Welfare State as Piggy Bank Information, Risk, Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. Oxford University Press.
• Besley, T. Burgess, R. & Prat, A. (2002). Mass Media and Political Accountability. In Islam, R. (Ed.) The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Development. Washington: World Bank Publications.
• Bjornstad D. J. & Brown, M. A. (2004). Market failures framework for defining the government’s role in energy efficiency. Joint Institute for Energy and Environment. Report Number: JIEE, 2.
• Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1), 1-44.
• Collins, R. (2006). Taking the high ground: The struggle for ideas in the UK broadcasting policy. Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change Working Paper Series, (20).
• Collins, R. Finn, A. McFadyen, S. Hoskins, C. (2001). Public service broadcasting beyond 2000: is there a future for public service broadcasting?. Canadian Journal of Communication, 26(1), 3-15.
• Cox, B. (2004). Free for All? Public Service Television in the Digital Age. London: Demos.
• Davies, G. (2005). The BBC and Public Value. In Helm, D. (Ed.) Can the Market Deliver? Funding Public Service Television in the Digital Age (129-150). Indiana University Press.
• Dijk, M. V. Nahuis, R. & Waagmeester, D. (2006). Does Public Service Broadcasting Serve The Public? The Future of Television in the Changing Media Landscape. De Economist, 154(2), 251-276.
• Digital News (2011). Western Europe digital TV penetration to reach 99% by 2016. Retrieved from http://www.digitaltvnews.net/?p=19181
• Elstain, D. (2005). Public Service Broadcasting in the Digital Age. Economic Affairs, 25(4), 68-70.
• Gibson, O. (2008, August 18). Survey blow to BBC as public question case for licence fee. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/aug/18/bbc.television3?INTCMP=SRCH.
• Graham, A. (1998). Broadcasting Policy and the Digital Revolution. The Political Quarterly, 69(B), 30-42.
• Hamilton, J. T. (1998). Channeling Violence: The Economic Market for Violent Television Programming. United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
• Hamlin, A. (1993). Public Expenditure and Political Process. In Gemmell, E. (Ed.) The Growth of the Public Sector: Theories and International Evidence. Hants: Edwar Edgar.
• Hargreaves-Heap, S. P. (2005). Television in a digital age: what role for public service broadcasting?. Economic Policy, 20(41), 112-157.
• Helm, D. (2005). Consumer, Citizens and Members: Public Service Broadcasting and the BBC. In Helm, D. (Ed.) Can the Market Deliver? Funding Public Service Television in the Digital Age (1-21). Indiana University Press.
• Hoskins, C. McFadyen, S. & Finn, A. (2004). Media Economics Applying Economics to New and Traditional Media. California: Sage.
• Jonathan, R. (2008, August 18). More people get news from web than TV or print. The Sunday Times. Retrieved from http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/article4559162.ece.
• Laffont, J. J. (2008). Externalities. In Durlauf, S. N. Blume, L. E. (Eds.) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Retrieved from http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_E000200
• Lindstädt, N. (2010). Germany’s PSB Going Online - Is There an Economic Justification for Public Service Media Online?.
• Lipsey, D. (2004). The BBC and Public Value Commentary by Lord David Lipsey. Retrieved from http://www.smf.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2004/12/Publication-The-BBC-and-Public-Value.pdf
• Mitchell, R. C. & Carson, R.T. (1989). Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation methods. Resources for the Future.
• Ofcom (2011). Annex 11: Market Failure in Broadcasting. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/consultations/psb2_1/annexes/annex11.pdf
• Office for National Statistics (2010). The impact of new media.: Television. Retrieved from https://moodle.queenelizabeth.cumbria.sch.uk/pluginfile.php/238435/mod_resource/content/0/83%20TV%20-%20impact%20new%20media.pdf
• Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). European Television in the Digital Age. Oxford: Polity.
• Prat, A. & Strömberg, D. (2005). Commercial Television and Voter Information. CEPR Discussion Papers 4989.
• Peacock, A. (2000). Market Failure and Government Failure in Broadcasting. Economic Affair, 20(4), 2-6.
• Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Stiglitz, J. (2000). Economics of the Public Sector, 3rd ed. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
• The Statistics Portal (2016). Share of television households with digital television reception in European countries in 2016. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/427707/digital-tv-penetration-european-countries/
• von Hagen, J. & Seabright, P. (2007). Introduction: the future of economic regulation in broadcasting market. In Seabright, P. & von Hagen, J. (Eds.) The Economic Regulation of Broadcasting Markets – Evolving Technology and Challenges for Policy (3-10). Cambridge University Press.