Year 2012, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 93 - 120 2012-06-01

Developing Information Technology Activity System For Effective Management: A Study In Inonu University
ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

  Doç.Dr.Lutfiye ÖZDEMİR [1]

153 327

Araştırma, bir kurumun daha etkin yönetilebilmesi için “bilişim teknolojisi etkinlik sistemi” geliştirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırmacı, sistemi etkinlik teorisine dayanarak geliştirdi ve BT’ni etkinlik sistemine araçlar olarak yerleştirdi. Araştırma İnönü Üniversitesi’nde uygulandı. Araştırmacı, BT’yle ilgili veriyi anket yöntemiyle toplamıştır. Toplam 457 anket değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmacı, verilerin değerlendirilmesinde faktör analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, korelasyon analizi, T-testi ve varyans analizini kullanmıştır. Araştırmacı, faktör analizinin sonucunda “BT beceri ölçeği”, “BT tutum ölçeği” ve “BT’nin kullanım alanları ölçeği” geliştirmiştir. Korelasyon analizi sonucunda ise “orta düzey BT becerisi” ve “orta üstü BT becerisi” arasında yüksek düzeyli pozitif bir ilişki bulmuştur. Ayrıca “orta düzey BT becerisi” ile “BT’ne karşı negatif tutum” arasında yüksek düzeyde negatif bir ilişki görmüştür. Son olarak BT için geliştirilen ölçeklerde katılımcıların demografik özelliklerine göre önemli farklılıklar saptamıştır.
Etkinlik Teorisi, Bilişim Teknolojisi, Yönetim
  • 1. BEDNY, G. and W. Karwowski, (2007), A Systemic – Structural Theory of Activity : Applications to Human Performance and Work Design, CRC Press.
  • 2. BERBEROGLU, G. and G. Calikoglu, (1993), “Factorial Validity of The Turkish Computer Attitude Scale”, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol 19, 257-263.
  • 3. BOUDREAU, J. W. (2007), “Internet”, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g978063123 3176_chunk_g978140511697812_pp1-22, 11.11.2007.
  • 4. BROSNAN, M. (1998), “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes and Anxieties: The United Kingdom and Hong Kong”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 14, No 4, 559- 577.
  • 5. CHEN, M.V. (2005), Adult Students Information Technology Experience and Attitudes Toward Use of Computers Technology, Unpublished Postgraduate Thesis, Mississippi University.
  • 6. COHEN, J. (1988), Statistical Power Analysis for The Behavioural Sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • 7. COLE, M. (1996), Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  • 8. COLE, M. and Y. Engestrom (1993), “A Cultural-Historical Approach to Distributed Cognition”, Edt: G. Salomon, Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • 9. DAVIS, G. B. (2007), “Software”, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management, http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g978063123 3176_chunk_g978140510065622_pp1-9, 11.11.2007.
  • 10. DAVYDOV, V.V. (1999), “The Content and Unsolved Problems of Activity Theory”, Edt: Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinen, R. Punamaki, Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • 11. ENGESTROM, Y. (1987), Learning by Expanding: An ActivityTheoretical Approach to Developmental Research, Orienta-Konsultit, Helsinki.
  • 12. ENGESTROM, Y. (1993), “Developmental Studies on Work As A Testbench of Activity Theory: The Case of Primary Care Medical Practice”, Edt: S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • 13. ENGESTROM, Y. (2001), “Expansive Learning at Work: Toward An Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol 14, 133-156.
  • 14. ENGESTROM, Y. and D. Middleton, (1996), “Introduction: Studying Work As Mindful Practice”, Edt: Y. Engestrom, D. Middleton, Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press: New York.
  • 15. ENGESTROM, Y., (1994), “Teachers As Collaborative Thinkers: Activity-Theoretical Study of An Innovative Teacher Team”, Edt: I. Carlgren, G. Handal and S. Vaage, Teachers’ Minds and Actions: Research on Teachers’ Thinking and Practice, The Falmer Press: Washington.
  • 16. GREASLEY, P. (2008), Quantitative Data Analysis Using SPSS: An Introduction for Health and Social Science, RefineCatch Limited: Bungay.
  • 17. HASU, M. and R. Engestrom (1999), Measurement in Action: An Activity-Theoretical Perspective on Producer User Interaction, University of Helsinki, Helsinki.
  • 18. ISSROFF, K. and E. Scanlon, (2002), “Using Technology in Higher Education: An Activity Theory Perspective”, Journal of Computer, Vol 18, 77-83.
  • 19. KAPTELININ, V. (1996a), “Computer- Mediated Activity: Functional Organs in Social and Development Contexts”, Edt: B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press: Cambridge.
  • 20. KAPTELININ, V. (1996b), “Activity Theory: Implications for HumanComputer Interaction”, Edt: B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • 21. KUUTTI, K. (1996), “Activity Theory As A Potential Framework for Human-Computer Interaction Research”, Edt: B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press: Cambridge.
  • 22. LATOUR, B. (1993), On Tecnical Mediation. Three Talks Prepared for “The Messenger Lectures on the Evolation of Civilization.” Cornell University, April. The author transferring KAPTELININ, V. (1996a), “Computer- Mediated Activity: Functional Organs in Social and Development Contexts”, Edt: B. A. Nardi, Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, MIT Press: Cambridge.
  • 23. LESTER, P. E. and L. K. Bishop, (2000), Handbook of Tests and Measurement in Education and The Social Sciences, The Scarecrow Press: London.
  • 24. LIM, C. P. and D. Hang, (2003), “An Activity Theory Approach to Research of ICT Integration in Singapore Schools” Computers and Education, Vol 41, 49-63.
  • 25. LIM, C. H. (2002), “A Theoreticel Framework for The Study of ICT in Schools: A Proposal”, British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol 33, 411-421.
  • 26. MEELISSEN, M.R.M. and M. Drent, (2008), “Gender Differences in Computer Attitudes: Does The School Matter”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 24, 969-1085.
  • 27. MOLLOY, S. and C. R. Schwenk, (1995), “The Effect of Information Technology on Strategic Decision Making”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol 32, 283-311.
  • 28. NARDI, B. (1996), “Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction”, Edt: B. Nardi, Context and Consciousness, MIT Press: London.
  • 29. OK, Ü., L. Özdemir and A. Kandemir, (2007), “IT (Information Technology) System As A Strategic Tool For The Effective Management in Higher Education: An Activity Theory Approach to A University IT System”, 3. International Strategic Management Conference: Advances in Crafting in Business Strategies for National and International Market, 447-462.
  • 30. OOSTERWEGEL, A., K. Littleton and P. Light, (2004), “Understanding Computer-Related Attitudes Through An Idiographic Analysis of Gender and Self-Representations”, Learning and Instruction, Vol 14, 215-233.
  • 31. POPOVICH, P.M., N. Gullekson, S. Morris and B. Morse, (2008), “Comparing Attitudes Towards Computers Use by Undergraduates from 1986 to 2005”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol 24, 986-992.
  • 32. REED, K. (1998), New Age Technology and New “Aged” Workers: The Impact of Age on Computer Technology Skill Acquisition and The Influence of Computer Self-Efficacy, Age-Related Beliefs, and Change Attitudes, Unpublished Postgraduate Thesis, Nebraska University.
  • 33. TAVSANCIL, E. and H. Keser, (2002), “Internet Kullanımına Yonelik Likert Tipi Bir Tutum Olceginin Gelistirilmesi”, Egitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, Vol 1, 79-100.
  • 34. TAVSANCIL, E. (2002), Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi, Nobel Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  • 35. VELASQUEZ, N.J. (2002), An Exploration of Teacher Attitude, Skill and Tools As Predictors for The Integration of Technology in The K-12 Classroom, Unpublished Postgraduate Thesis, Nevada University.
  • 36. VYGOTSKY, L. (1978), Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Primary Language tr
Subjects
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Author:   Doç.Dr.Lutfiye ÖZDEMİR

Bibtex @ { sduiibfd222847, journal = {Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi}, issn = {1301-0603}, address = {Süleyman Demirel University}, year = {2012}, volume = {17}, pages = {93 - 120}, doi = {}, title = {ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA}, key = {cite}, author = {ÖZDEMİR,   Doç.Dr.Lutfiye} }
APA ÖZDEMİR,   . (2012). ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (2), 93-120. Retrieved from http://dergipark.org.tr/sduiibfd/issue/20821/222847
MLA ÖZDEMİR,   . "ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (2012): 93-120 <http://dergipark.org.tr/sduiibfd/issue/20821/222847>
Chicago ÖZDEMİR,   . "ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 17 (2012): 93-120
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA AU -   Doç.Dr.Lutfiye ÖZDEMİR Y1 - 2012 PY - 2012 N1 - DO - T2 - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 93 EP - 120 VL - 17 IS - 2 SN - 1301-0603- M3 - UR - Y2 - 2019 ER -
EndNote %0 Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA %A   Doç.Dr.Lutfiye ÖZDEMİR %T ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA %D 2012 %J Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi %P 1301-0603- %V 17 %N 2 %R %U
ISNAD ÖZDEMİR,   Doç.Dr.Lutfiye . "ETKİN YÖNETİM İÇİN BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİSİ ETKİNLİK SİSTEMİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ: İNÖNÜ ÜNİVERSİTESİ’NDE BİR ARAŞTIRMA". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 17 / 2 (June 2012): 93-120.