Çeviri Eğitiminde Motivasyonu Artırmak: Çeviribilim Öğrencilerinin Başarı Amaç Yönelimleri

Yıl 2019, Sayı: 41, 1 - 14, 19.06.2019

Ayşe Işık Akdağ

https://doi.org/10.21497/sefad.586510

Öz

Bu
çalışma çeviri eğitiminde öğrenci motivasyonunu artırmak için Çeviribilim
öğrencilerinin amaç başarı yönelimlerine ilişkin görüşlerini cinsiyet, bölüm, sınıf ve
akademik başarı algısı değişkenleri açısından incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.
Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modeline dayanmaktadır ve araştırma verileri
Türkçeye Akın & Çetin (2007) tarafından uyarlanan Başarı Yönelimleri Ölçeği
aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmaya 2017-2018 akademik yılında bir devlet
üniversitesinde Almanca, Fransızca ve İngilizce Mütercim Tercümanlık
Bölümlerinde kayıtlı bulunan 242 öğrenci katılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda amaç
başarı yönelimlerinin üç alt boyutundan ilki olan öğrenme yöneliminin cinsiyet
ve başarı algısı değişkenlerine göre; diğer alt boyut olan performans-yaklaşma
başarı yöneliminin bölüm ve cinsiyet değişkenlerine göre istatiksel açıdan
farklılaştığı bulunmuştur. Üçüncü alt boyut olan performans-kaçınma başarı
yöneliminin ise değişkenlerle arasında istatiksel açıdan anlamlı ilişki
bulunmamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çeviribilim, çeviri eğitimi, başarı amaç yönelimleri, motivasyon

Improving Motivation in Translator Training: Achievement Goal Orientations of Translation Studies Students

Öz

In order to improve the student
motivation, this study aims to determine the opinions of Translation Studies
students about achievement goal orientations in terms of variables such as
gender, department, class and perception of academic achievement. Research is
based on the relational screening model and the research data was collected by
using the Goal Orientations Scale adapted to Turkish by Akın & Çetin
(2007). During the academic year 2017-2018, 242 students studying in the
German, French and English Translation Studies Departments at a state
university participated in the research. As a result, it was observed that learning
orientation, one of the three sub-dimensions of achievement goal orientations,
varies significantly by gender and perception of academic achievement; and
performance-approach orientation, other sub-dimension, by department and
gender. No statistically significant relationship was found between variables
and performance-avoidance orientation, the third sub-dimension.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Translation Studies, translator training, achievement goal orientations, motivation

Kaynakça

• Akalın, R. ve Gündoğdu, M. (2010). Akademik çeviri eğitiminin temel ilkeleri üzerine düşünceler: uygulanan ders izlenceleri bağlamında hedefler ve beklentiler. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 79-93.
• Akdağ, A. I. (2015). Fransızca mütercim tercümanlık öğrencilerinin mezun profili. Journal of International Social Research, 8(37), 659-672.
• Akdağ, A. I. (2016). Objectives in translator training departments. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 5(2), 66-73.
• Akın, A. (2006). Başarı amaç oyantasyonları ile bilişötesi farkındalık, evebeyn tutumları ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişkiler (Unpublished master’s thesis). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
• Akın, A. ve Çetin, B (2007). Başarı yönelimleri ölçeği: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (EJER), (26), 1-12.
• Alpar, R. (2013). Çok değişkenli istatistiksel yöntemler (4th ed.). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260- 267.
• Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational psychology, 84(3), 261- 271.
• Anderman, E. M & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269-298.
• Anderman, E. M. & Maehr, M. L. (1994). Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287-309.
• Arslan, A. (2011). Öğretmen adaylarının amaç yönelimleri ile yapılandırmacılığa yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1), 107-122.
• Bandura, M. & Dweck, C. (1985). Self-conceptions and motivation: conceptions of intelligence, choice of achievement goals, and patterns of cognition, affect and behavior. Unpublished Manuscript. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
• Bontempo, K. & Napier, J. (2011). Evaluating emotional stability as a predictor of interpreter competence and aptitude for interpreting. Interpreting, 13(1), 85-105.
• Brophy, J (2004). Motivating students to learn (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organisational rresearch: a conceptual and empirical foundation. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26–48.
• Deemer, S. (2004) Classroom goal orientation in high school classrooms: revealing links between teacher beliefs and classroom environments. Educational Research, 46(1), 73-90, DOI: 10.1080/0013188042000178836
• Diener, C. I. & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451.
• Diener, C. I. & Dweck, C. S. (1980). An analysis of learned helplessness: II. the processing of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 940- 952.
• Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
• Dweck, C. S. (1989). Motivation. A. Lesgold & R. Glaser (Eds.), Foundations for Psychology of Education (87-136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Eison, J. A. (1980). The development and validation of a scale to assess different student orientations towards grades and learning (Doctoral Dissertation). Knoxville: University of Tennessee.
• Elliot, A. J. & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232.
• Elliot, A. J. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: a mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(3), 461- 475.
• Elliot, A. J. & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance- approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation?. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 339-356.
• Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
• Elliott, E, S. & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
• Farsani, M. A., Beikmohammadi, M., & Mohebbi, A. (2014). Self-regulated learning, goal-oriented learning, and academic writing performance of undergraduate Iranıan EFL learners. Tesl-Ej, 18(2), 1-19.
• Hashempour, M., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2015). A study of translation students' self-regulation and metacognitive awareness in association with their gender and educational level. International Journal of Comparative Literature and Translation Studies, 3(3), 60-69.
• Heyman, G. D. & Dweck, C. S. (1992). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: their relation and their role in adaptive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, (16), 231–247.
• İzci, E. ve Koç, S. (2012). Pedogojik formasyon eğitimi alan öğrencilerin başarı yönelim düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4(8), 31-43.
• Jamovi P. (2018). Jamovi (Version 0.9.1.5) [Computer Software]. Retrieved July 2018 From Https://Www.Jamovi.Org
• Karasar, N. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kelly, D. (2005). A handbook for translator trainers. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
• Koç, C ve Arslan, A. (2015). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin başarı yönelimlerinin ve okuma stratejileri bilişüstü farkındalıklarının incelenmesi. Pegem Eğitim Ve Öğretim Dergisi, 5(5), 485-508.
• Küçükoğlu, A., Kaya, H. İ., & Turan, A. (2010). Sınıf öğretmenliği ABD öğrencilerinin başarı yönelimi algılarının farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Atatürk Üniversitesi ve On Dokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Örneği). Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(2), 121-135.
• Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.
• Matos, L. W. L. &Vansteenkiste, M. (2007). Achievement goals, learning strategies and language achievement among peruvian high school students. Psychologica Belgica, 47(1), 51-70.
• Mentiş K. A. & Aydıner U. M. (2017). Examining the achievement goal orientation levels of turkish pre-service music teachers. International Journal of Music Education, 36(3), 313-333. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0255761417734693
• Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86.
• Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M. L., Urdan, T., Anderman, L. H., ... & Roeser, R. (1998). The development and validation of scales assessing students' achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 113-131.
• Nicholls, J. G. (1975). Causal attributions and other achievement-related cognitions: effects of task outcome, attainment value, and sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 379–389.
• Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346.
• Nicholls, J. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
• Özkal, N., Demirtas, V. Y., Sucuoglu, H. K., & Guzeller, C. O. (2014). The relationship between the achievement goal orientation and the self efficacy beliefs of the candidate teachers. Mevlana International Journal of Education (MIJE), 4(1), 212-227.
• Pintrich, P. R. & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. Student Perceptions in the Classroom, 7, 149-183.
• Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
• Toğluk, E. (2009). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin başarı yönelimleri. Unpublished (Master’s Thesis). İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi.
• Urdan, T. C. & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: a case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213-243.
• Wolters, C. A., Shirley, L. Y., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8(3), 211-238.