TY  - JOUR
T1  - the FUndamentalIst’s defInItIons of the termInology of word’s topIcs ReadIng In the structurIng of the lexIcal meanIng
TT  - the FUndamentalIst’s defInItIons of the termInology of word’s topIcs ReadIng In the structurIng of the lexIcal meanIng
AU  - Deba, Tayeb
PY  - 2012
DA  - June
JF  - Şarkiyat Mecmuası
PB  - İstanbul Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1307-5020
SP  - 17
EP  - 38
VL  - 0
IS  - 19
LA  - en
AB  - This study is an attempt to review the efforts of fundamentalist scientists(al-osoliyu: n) in the preparation of the lexical meanings which they call«the names of words» or the terminology of word’s topics like (general[-al-a:m], particular [-alh’a:S], the common [almuS’tarak], absolute[almuTlaq], restricted [almuqayad] and others). It is a terminologiesof their own which they needed it to describe the words of the Islamicruling and it’s significances, and they seek to organize it, and to distributeit’s levels, by a structured semantic treatment seems approach – in someof it’s methodological procedures – to the treatments covered by somecontemporary scholars interested in the semantic and lexical researches,especially the westerners. The importance of this fundamentalist treatmentit is issued by a particular linguistic vision, and a distinctive functionalmechanism and it represents a precise strategy to understand the appointedlegal discourse, and to extract it’s provisions and purposes. The purpose ofthis study is to identify the features of this strategy, which we can summe upit’s theme in: an original fundamentalist attempt to structuring the lexicalmeaning
KW  - Word’s topics
KW  - Fundamentalist definitions of the names of words
KW  - Structuring of Lexical meaning
KW  - Semantic analysis
KW  - Opposition.
N2  - This study is an attempt to review the efforts of fundamentalist scientists(al-osoliyu: n) in the preparation of the lexical meanings which they call«the names of words» or the terminology of word’s topics like (general[-al-a:m], particular [-alh’a:S], the common [almuS’tarak], absolute[almuTlaq], restricted [almuqayad] and others). It is a terminologiesof their own which they needed it to describe the words of the Islamicruling and it’s significances, and they seek to organize it, and to distributeit’s levels, by a structured semantic treatment seems approach – in someof it’s methodological procedures – to the treatments covered by somecontemporary scholars interested in the semantic and lexical researches,especially the westerners. The importance of this fundamentalist treatmentit is issued by a particular linguistic vision, and a distinctive functionalmechanism and it represents a precise strategy to understand the appointedlegal discourse, and to extract it’s provisions and purposes. The purpose ofthis study is to identify the features of this strategy, which we can summe upit’s theme in: an original fundamentalist attempt to structuring the lexicalmeaning
CR  - -Arcaini.E, Principes de linguistique appliquée, Payot, Paris.
CR  - -Dubois .J et autres ,Dictionnaire de linguistique, Larousse, Paris. -Ducrot.O et Todorov.T, Dictionnaire encyclopédique des sciences du langage, Seuil, 1972.
CR  - - Greimas.A.J, Sémantique structurale, P.U.F, Paris, 1986 -Hjelmslev.L,
CR  - - Prolégomènes a une théorie du langage, (Tr/Una Canger), Edt de MINUIT,1971. - Essais linguistiques, Edt de Minuit, Paris , 1971.
CR  - -Malberg. B, Les nouvelles tendances de la linguistique, P.U.F, Paris, 1968 .
CR  - -Saussure. F (de), Cours de linguistique générale, (préparée par Tullio de Mauro), Payot Paris,1985
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iusarkiyat/issue//11374
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/10516
ER  -