TY  - JOUR
T1  - Yaya Dostu Araç Tampon Tasarımı
TT  - Pedestrian-Friendly Vehicle Bumper Design
AU  - Karpat, Fatih
AU  - Kalay, Onur Can
AU  - Vargelci, Sinan
AU  - Catenaro, Lino
PY  - 2022
DA  - December
DO  - 10.31590/ejosat.1220760
JF  - Avrupa Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi
JO  - EJOSAT
PB  - Osman SAĞDIÇ
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-2683
SP  - 126
EP  - 130
IS  - 45
LA  - tr
AB  - Araç-yaya kazalarında yüksek yaralanma ve hatta ölüm riskleri göz önüne alındığında, yayalar araç pasif güvenliği kapsamındasavunmasız kullanıcılar olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, otomobil üreticileri, özellikle son yirmi yılda, araçta bulunanlarınve yayaların yaralanmasını (ve buna bağlı ölümleri) en aza indirmek maksadı ile ürünlerine birçok yeni özellik dâhil etmişlerdir. Yinede, her yıl yüzbinlerce insan trafik kazaları neticesinde hayatını kaybetmektedir. Bu noktadan hareketle, yaya yaralanmaları (vegüvenliği) konusu küresel çapta yankı uyandıran bir güvenlik sorunu haline gelmiş ve yaya dostu araç tasarımlarına olan ilgi(farkındalık) de artmıştır. Otomobil araç tampon sistemi, çarpışmanın ürettiği darbe enerjisini emmeyi ve bir dereceye kadar yolcuyu,yayayı ve araç gövdesini korumayı amaçlayan kritik bir araç bileşendir. Bu çalışmada, otomobil araç tampon tasarımının yayagüvenliği üzerindeki etkisini daha iyi anlamak için sistematik bir literatür taraması yaklaşımından faydalanılmıştır. Bu kapsamda,tasarımın, malzeme seçiminin ve geometri değişikliklerinin araç tampon sisteminin performansı üzerindeki etkisi yaya güvenliğidikkate alınarak incelenmiştir. Yaya dostu araç tampon tasarımlarında kullanılan güncel yaklaşımlar ortaya koyulmuş ve tartışılmıştır.
KW  - Otomobil
KW  - Tampon
KW  - Yaya Güvenliği
KW  - Yaralanma
KW  - Sonlu Elemanlar.
KW  - Automotive
KW  - Bumper
KW  - Pedestrian Safety
KW  - Injury
KW  - Finite Element.
N2  - Pedestrians are considered vulnerable users, considering their high risk of injury or even fatality in car-to-pedestrian accidents. Thepost-accident injuries may lead to long-term hospitalizations and deprivation of daily activities. In this regard, car manufacturers haveincorporated several new features into their products in order to minimize injury (and associated fatalities) to vehicle occupants andpedestrians, especially in the last two decades. Yet hundreds of thousands of people have died on roadways each year. From thisstandpoint, pedestrian injuries have become a globally recognized safety concern; hence the interest (and awareness) in pedestrian-friendly vehicle designs has increased. The automobile vehicle bumper system aims to absorb the impact energy produced by thecollision and, to some extent, preserve the occupant, pedestrian, and car body. So far, the researchers have performed extensive studiesin order to address the relationship between vehicle design and pedestrian safety based on numerical simulations, accident data, andcrash tests. In order to better understand the influence of vehicle bumper design on pedestrian safety, the present study adopted asystematic literature review approach. It aimed to help gain better insights regarding the effects of design, material selection, andgeometrical modifications on the performance of the bumper system, considering pedestrian safety. The current trends in designingpedestrian-friendly vehicle bumper designs were identified and discussed.
CR  - Ahmed, A. (2020). The influence of the vehicle hood inclination
angle on the severity of the pedestrian adult head injury in a
front collision using finite element modeling. Thin-Walled
Structures, 150, 106674.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2020.106674
CR  - Chandak, A., Gandhe, N., Choudhari, K., Gaikwad, N., &
Thorat, P. (2021). To enhance crashworthiness of an
automobile by introducing energy absorbers and to study its
implementation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 47, 3006–
3011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.477
CR  - Chen, S., Kuhn, M., Prettner, K., & and Bloom, D. E. (2019).
The global macroeconomic burden of road injuries:
estimates and projections for 166 countries external icon.
The Lancet Planetary Health, 3, 390–398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30170-6
CR  - Chu, Y., Sun, L., & Li, L. (2019). Lightweight scheme selection
for automotive safety structures using a quantifiable multiobjective approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241,
118316.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118316
CR  - Davoodi, M. M., Sapuan, S. M., & Yunus, R. (2008). Conceptual
design of a polymer composite automotive bumper energy
absorber. Materials & Design, 29(7), 1447–1452.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2007.07.011
CR  - Davoodi, M. M., Sapuan, S. M., Aidy, A., Abu Osman, N. A.,
Oshkour, A. A., & Wan Abas, W. A. B. (2012). Development
process of new bumper beam for passenger car: A review.
Materials & Design, 40, 304–313.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.060
CR  - Decker, W., Koya, B., Pak, W., Untaroiu, C. D., & Gayzik, F. Z.
(2019). Evaluation of finite element human body models for
use in a standardized protocol for pedestrian safety
assessment. Traffic Injury Prevention, 20, 32–36.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2019.1637518
CR  - Godara, S. S. & Nagar, S. N. (2020). Analysis of frontal bumper
beam of automobile vehicle by using carbon fiber composite
material. Materials Today: Proceedings, 26, 2601–2607.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.550
CR  - Huang, Y., Zhou, Q., Koelper, C., Li, Q., & Nie, B. (2020). Are
riders of electric two-wheelers safer than bicyclists in
collisions with motor vehicles? Accident and Analysis and
Prevention, 134, 105336.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105336
CR  - Ishikawa, T., Kore, H., Furumoto, A., & Kuroda, S. (2003).
Evaluation of pedestrian protection structures using
impactors and full-scale dummy tests. In Proceedings of the
18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced
Safety of Vehicles, paper 271.
CR  - Kim, D. –H., Jung, K. –H., Kim, D. –J., Park S. –H., Kim, D. –
H., Lim, J., Nam, B. –G., & Kim, H. –S. (2017). Improving
pedestrian safety via the optimization of composite hood
structures for automobiles based on the equivalent static
load method. Composite Structures, 176, 780–789.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.016
CR  - Lei, F., Lv, X., Fang, J., Pang, T., Li, Q., & Sun, G. (2021).
Injury biomechanics-based nondeterministic optimization of
front-end structures for safety in pedestrian-vehicle impact.
Thin-Walled Structures, 167, 108087.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108087
CR  - Liu, Y., Wan, X., Xu, W., Shi, L., Deng, G., & Bai, Z. (2022). An
intelligent method for accident reconstruction involving car
and e-bike coupling automatic simulation and multiobjective optimizations. Accident Analysis and Prevention,
164, 106476.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106476
CR  - Nachippan, N. M., Alphonse, M., Bupesh Raja, V. K.,
Palanikumar, K., Sai Uday Kiran, R., & Gopala Krishna, V.
(2021). Numerical analysis of natural fiber reinforced
composite bumper. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46,
3817–3823.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.045
CR  - Qi, C., Sun, Y., & Yang, S. (2018). A comparative study on
empty and foam-filled hybrid material double-hat beams
under lateral impact. Thin-Walled Structures, 129, 327–341.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2018.04.018
CR  - Rambhad, K., Sutar, V., Sonwane, P., Suryawanshi, S., & and
Thigale, M. (2020). A review on automotive bumper beam
design and analysis. Journal of Automotive Engineering and
Technology, 5(1), 21–35.
CR  - Shang, S., Masson, C., Llari, M., Py, M., Ferrand, Q., Arnoux, P.
–J., & Simms, C. (2021). The predictive capacity of the
MADYMO ellipsoid pedestrian model for pedestrian ground
contact kinematics and injury evaluation. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 149, 105803.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105803
CR  - Sun, G., Wang, X., Fang, J., Pang, T., & Li, Q. (2021).
Parallelized optimization design of bumper systems under
multiple low-speed impact loads. Thin-Walled Structures,
167, 108197.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108197
CR  - Teng, T. –L., Ngo, V. –C., & Nguyen, T. –H. (2010). Design of
pedestrian friendly vehicle bumper. Journal of Mechanical
Science and Technology, 24, 2067–2073.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-010-0612-0
CR  - Teng, T. –L., Liang, C. –C., & Vu, T. –A. (2016). Bumper shape
design for pedestrian safety. Journal of Mechanical Science
and Technology, 30, 3243–3251.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0632-5
CR  - Wang, C. Y., Wang, W. W., Zhao, W. Z., Wang, Y., & Zhou, G.
(2018). Structure design and multi-objective optimization of
a novel NPR bumper system. Composites Part B, 153, 78–
96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.07.024
CR  - World Health Organization (WHO). Road Traffic Injuries. June
2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries/
CR  - Yang, S., Sun, Y., & Qi, C. (2020). Performance assessment and
optimal design of hybrid material bumper for pedestrian
lower extremity protection. International Journal of
Mechanical Sciences, 165, 105210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105210
CR  - Zhang, Y. –L., Zeng, H. –T., Yang, X. –A., Yang, T. –F., Miao,
Q. –F., Zhao, W. –D., Tong, F., & Li, D. –R. (2022).
Characteristics of human movement and injury in a side
collision between the front of a snall car and a bicycle.
Legal Medicine, 59, 102116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2022.102116
CR  - Zhou, Q., Xia, Y., Wei, X., & Meng, Y. (2022). Temperature
influence on impact protection performance of steel-plastic
structures–Manifested by head impact against pillars of
passenger car. International Journal of Impact Engineering,
159, 104054.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104054
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31590/ejosat.1220760
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2838730
ER  -