TY  - JOUR
T1  - Tek Diş İmplantların Klinik, Radyografik, Estetik ve Hasta Memnuniyeti Açısından Kontralateral Dişler ile Karşılaştırılması
TT  - Comparison of Single-Tooth Dental Implants with Contralateral Teeth in Terms of Clinical, Radiographic, Aesthetic and Patient Satisfaction
AU  - Küçükoglu Çolak, Merve
AU  - Cengiz, Murat İnanç
PY  - 2023
DA  - October
DO  - 10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1280078
JF  - Türk Diş Hekimliği Araştırma Dergisi
JO  - J Turkish Dent Res
PB  - Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2822-4310
SP  - 179
EP  - 190
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
LA  - tr
AB  - Amaç: Çalışmamızın amacı; maksilla anterior bölge tekdiş eksikliklerinde uygulanan dental implantları kontralateraldişlerle klinik, radyografik ve estetik olarak karşılaştırmak vehasta memnuniyetini değerlendirmektedir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza fakültemizde 2010-2020yılları arasında tek diş eksikliğinde dental implant uygulamasıyapılmış ve kontralateral dişi mevcut olan 40 hasta dahiledilmiştir. Hastaların rutin kontrolleri sırasında peri-implantve periodontal sondlama derinliği (PD), plak indeksi (PI)ve gingival indeks (GI) değerleri, sondlamada kanama (SK)varlığı, dişeti çekilmesi (DÇ) miktarı kaydedilmiştir. Herhastaya görsel analog skala (VAS, Visual Analog Scale)soruları yönelterek hasta memnuniyeti ve estetik değerlendirmegerçekleştirilmiştir. İmplant destekli restorasyonun estetiğinideğerlendirmek içinde de Komplex estetik indeks (KEİ)kullanılmıştır.Bulgular: Diş ve implant bölgelerinde klinik parametreleraçısından anlamlı fark görülmemiştir. İmplant bölgesindeistatiksel olarak anlamlı olarak fazla sondalama derinliğitespit edilmiştir. Keratinize diş eti miktarı ise diş bölgesindeistatiksel olarak anlamlı derecede daha fazla olduğugözlemlenmiştir. İmplant üstü restorasyonların KEİ iledeğerlendirilmesinde ise çoğunlukla riskli ama klinik olarakkabul edilebilir olarak gözlenmiştir. Hastaların ortalamamemnuniyet skoru 8,44±1.11’dir. Hastaların büyük çoğunluğutedaviden memnuniyet skorunun anlamlı olarak yüksek olduğugörülmüştür.Sonuç: İmplant ve diş bölgesi arasında periodonalindekslerde anlamlı farklılık bulunamıştır. Keratinize diş etimiktarı ve cep derinliği açısından iki bölgede farklılıklarmevcuttur. Estetik olarak implant üstü protezler kabul edilebilirdüzeydedir. Hastalar uygulanan tedaviden memnun ve tedaviyitavsiye etmektedirler.
KW  - Dental İmplant
KW  - estetik
KW  - KEİ
KW  - hasta memnuniyeti
KW  - VAS
N2  - Aim: The aim of this study is to compare dental implantsapplied in single tooth deficiencies in the maxilla anteriorregion with contralateral teeth clinically, radiographically,aesthetically and evaluate patient satisfactionMaterials and Methods: In our study, 40 patients withcontralateral teeth who underwent dental implant applicationin a single missing tooth between 2010-2020 were included.During the routine controls of the patients, peri-implant andperiodontal probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI) and gingivalindex (GI), the presence of bleeding (BOP) on probing, andthe amount of gingival recession (GR) were recorded. Patientsatisfaction and aesthetic evaluation were performed by askingeach patient questions on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).The Complex aesthetic index (CEİ) was used to evaluate theaesthetics of the implant-supported restoration.Results: There was no significant difference in clinicalparameters tooth and implant regions. Statistically significantexcess probing depth was detected in the implant area. Theamount of keratinized gingiva was statistically significantlyhigher in the tooth region.. In the evaluation of implantrestorations with CEİ, it was mostly observed as risky butclinically acceptable. The mean satisfaction score was8.44±1.11. It was observed that the majority of the patients hada significantly higher treatment satisfaction score.Conclusion: There was no significant difference inperiodonal indices between both region. There are differencesin the two regions in terms of the amount of keratinized gingivaand the probing depth of the pocket. Aesthetically, implantsupportedprostheses are acceptable. Patients are satisfied withthe procedure and recommend it.
CR  - Andersson B. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A
clinical and experimental study on the Branemark CeraOne
System. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1995;108:1-41.
CR  - Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The
topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal
and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol.
1994;21(3):189-93.
CR  - Buser D, Weber HP, Donath K, Fiorellini JP, Paquette
DW, Williams RC. Soft tissue reactions to non-submerged
unloaded titanium implants in beagle dogs. J Periodontol.
1992;63(3):225-35.
CR  - Jovanovic SA. Peri-implant tissue response to pathological
insults. Adv Dent Res. 1999;13:82-6.
CR  - Jemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after singleimplant
treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent.
1997;17(4):326-33.
CR  - 6. Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G,
Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth
implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants
Res. 2005;16(6):639-44.
CR  - Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Meijndert L, Raghoebar GM.
A new index for rating aesthetics of implant-supported
single crowns and adjacent soft tissues--the Implant Crown
Aesthetic Index. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(6):645-
9.
CR  - Belser UC, Grutter L, Vailati F, Bornstein MM, Weber HP,
Buser D. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary
anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic
criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients
with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic
scores. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):140-51.
CR  - Bianchi AE, Sanfilippo F. Single-tooth replacement by
immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year
clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(3):269-
77.
CR  - Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Esthetic index for anterior
maxillary implant-supported restorations. J Periodontol.
2010;81(1):34-42.
CR  - Slade GD. Oral health-related quality of life is important
for patients, but what about populations? Community Dent
Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40 Suppl 2(0 2):39-43.
CR  - Brennan M, Houston F, O’Sullivan M, O’Connell B. Patient
satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes
of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(4):791-800.
CR  - Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for
implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and
surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
CR  - Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated
endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62(5):567-72.
CR  - Sischo L, Broder HL. Oral health-related quality of life:
what, why, how, and future implications. J Dent Res.
2011;90(11):1264-70.
CR  - Lütfioğlu M, Sakallıoğlu U, Sert S, Sakallıoğlu EE, Ceylan
G. Reliability of periodontal diagnostic methods in the
assessment of periimplant health: A comparison of the
correlations amongst some clinical parameters. EÜ Dişhek
Fak Derg. 2010;31(2):95-101.
CR  - Karoussis IK, Muller S, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ,
Bragger U, Lang NP. Association between periodontal and
peri-implant conditions: a 10-year prospective study. Clin
Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(1):1-7.
CR  - Machtei EE, Oved-Peleg E, Peled M. Comparison of
clinical, radiographic and immunological parameters of
teeth and different dental implant platforms. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2006;17(6):658-65.
CR  - Pontoriero R, Tonelli MP, Carnevale G, Mombelli A,
Nyman SR, Lang NP. Experimentally induced peri-implant
mucositis. A clinical study in humans. Clin Oral Implants
Res. 1994;5(4):254-9.
CR  - Ueno D, Nagano T, Watanabe T, Shirakawa S, Yashima
A, Gomi K. Effect of the Keratinized Mucosa Width
on the Health Status of Periimplant and Contralateral
Periodontal Tissues: A Cross-sectional Study. Implant
Dent. 2016;25(6):796-801.
CR  - Toljanic JA, Ward CB, Gewerth ME, Banakis ML.
A Longitudinal Clinical Comparison Plaque-Induced
Inflammation Between Gingival and Peri-Implant Soft
Tissues in the Maxilla. J Periodontol. 2001;72(9):1139-45.
CR  - Demirel K, Dişçi R, Meriç H. Periodontal Yikim
Görülmeyen Bölgelerde Gingival İndeks Ve Sondalamada
Kanama Değerlendirmelerinin İlişkisi The Relationship
Of Bleeding On Probing And Gingival Index At Sites
Without Periodontal Breakdown. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent.
1996;30(1):12-6.
CR  - Ivanovski S, Lee R. Comparison of peri-implant and
periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease.
Periodontol 2000. 2018;76(1):116-30.
CR  - Puchades-Roman L, Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Howe LC, Ide
M, Wilson RF. A clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic
comparison of Astra Tech and Branemark single tooth
implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;2(2):78-84.
CR  - Chang M, Wennstrom JL, Odman P, Andersson B.
Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared
to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue
dimensions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(3):185-94.
CR  - Hof M, Umar N, Budas N, Seemann R, Pommer B, Zechner
W. Evaluation of implant esthetics using eight objective
indices-Comparative analysis of reliability and validity.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(7):697-706.
CR  - Juodzbalys G, Wang HL. Soft and hard tissue assessment
of immediate implant placement: a case series. Clin Oral
Implants Res. 2007;18(2):237-43.
CR  - Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter
L, Chappuis V, et al. Early implant placement with
simultaneous guided bone regeneration following singletooth
extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results
of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J
Periodontol. 2009;80(1):152-62.
CR  - Cosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Dierens M, De Rouck T.
Single implant treatment in healing versus healed sites of
the anterior maxilla: an aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant
Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(4):517-26.
CR  - Topçu AO, Yamalik N, Güncü GN, Tözüm TF, El H, Uysal
S, et al. Implant-Site Related and Patient-Based Factors
With the Potential to Impact Patients’ Satisfaction, Quality
of Life Measures and Perceptions Toward Dental Implant
Treatment. Implant Dentistry. 2017;26(4):581-91.
CR  - Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H.
Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):119-24.
CR  - Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Burgin W, Bragger U, Lang
NP. Patients’ satisfaction following implant therapy. A
10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res.
2005;16(2):185-93.
CR  - Ergun S, Çekici A, Saruhanoğlu A, Kazancioğlu Do,
Atilla Uzman D, Gülsüm A, Et Al. Dental İmplantlar
İle Rehabilite Edilmiş Hastalarin Memnuniyet
Derecelerinin Değerlendirilmesi. J Dent Fac Ataturk Univ.
2009;2009(3):181-6.
CR  - Erdil D, Yildiz H, Bağiş N. İmplant Tedavisinde Hasta
Memnuniyetinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turkiye Klinikleri J
Dental Sci. 2019;25(1):43-9.
CR  - Korenori A, Koji K, Yuki T, Murata T, Sachiko TM,
Shunsuke B. Cost-effectiveness of molar single-implant
versus fixed dental prosthesis. BMC Oral Health.
2018;18(1):141.
CR  - Walton TR, Layton DM. Satisfaction and Patient-Related
Outcomes in 128 Patients with Single Implant Crowns In
Situ for up to 14 Years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2017;32(3):667-74.
CR  - Dong H, Zhou N, Liu H, Huang H, Yang G, Chen L, et
al. Satisfaction analysis of patients with single implant
treatments based on a questionnaire survey. Patient Prefer
Adherence. 2019;13:695-704.
CR  - Meijndert L, Meijer HJ, Stellingsma K, Stegenga B,
Raghoebar GM. Evaluation of aesthetics of implantsupported
single-tooth replacements using different bone
augmentation procedures: a prospective randomized
clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(6):715-9.
CR  - Hartog L, Meijer HJ, Santing HJ, Vissink A, Raghoebar
GM. Patient satisfaction with single-tooth implant therapy
in the esthetic zone. Int J Prosthodont. 2014;27(3):226-8.
CR  - Stefanini M, Felice P, Mazzotti C, Mounssif I, Marzadori
M, Zucchelli G. Esthetic evaluation and patient-centered
outcomes in single-tooth implant rehabilitation in the
esthetic area. Periodontol 2000. 2018;77(1):150-64.
CR  - Al-Dosari A, Al-Rowis R, Moslem F, Alshehri F, Ballo AM.
Esthetic outcome for maxillary anterior single implants
assessed by different dental specialists. J Adv Prosthodont.
2016;8(5):345-53.
CR  - Carrillo de Albornoz A, Vignoletti F, Ferrantino L,
Cardenas E, De Sanctis M, Sanz M. A randomized trial on
the aesthetic outcomes of implant-supported restorations
with zirconia or titanium abutments. J Clin Periodontol.
2014;41(12):1161-9.
CR  - Chang M, Odman PA, Wennstrom JL, Andersson B.
Esthetic outcome of implant-supported single-tooth
replacements assessed by the patient and by prosthodontists.
Int J Prosthodont. 1999;12(4):335-41.
CR  - Fava J, Lin M, Zahran M, Jokstad A. Single implantsupported
crowns in the aesthetic zone: patient satisfaction
with aesthetic appearance compared with appraisals
by laypeople and dentists. Clin Oral Implants Res.
CR  - Bonde MJ, Stokholm R, Schou S, Isidor F. Patient
satisfaction and aesthetic outcome of implant-supported
single-tooth replacements performed by dental students: a
retrospective evaluation 8 to 12 years after treatment. Eur J
Oral Implantol. 2013;6(4):387-95.
CR  - Cho HL, Lee JK, Um HS, Chang BS. Esthetic evaluation
of maxillary single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. J
Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40(4):188-93.
CR  - Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hanselaer L, De Rouck T, Wyn I,
Sabzevar MM, et al. Four modalities of single implant
treatment in the anterior maxilla: a clinical, radiographic,
and aesthetic evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2013;15(4):517-30.
CR  - Den Hartog L, Raghoebar GM, Slater JJ, Stellingsma K,
Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Single-tooth implants with different
neck designs: a randomized clinical trial evaluating
the aesthetic outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.
2013;15(3):311-21.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.58711/turkishjdentres.vi.1280078
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3071627
ER  -