TY  - JOUR
T1  - Büyüme Gelişim Döneminde Maksiller Yetmezliğe Bağlı Sınıf III Bireyde Mini-Plak Ankrajlı Yüz Maskesi Uygulaması
TT  - Application of Mini-Plate Anchored Face Mask in Class III Individual Due to Maxillary Deficiency During the Period of Growth and Development
AU  - Tunca, Murat
AU  - Kaya, Yeşim
AU  - Ciğerim, Levent
AU  - Tunca, Yasemin
PY  - 2021
DA  - June
JF  - Van Diş Hekimliği Dergisi
JO  - VDJ
PB  - Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2757-6868
SP  - 70
EP  - 77
VL  - 2
IS  - 1
LA  - tr
AB  - Genellikle maksiller yetmezliklekarakterize olan iskeletsel sınıf III anomalilersosyal ve çevresel faktörlerin etkisiyle bireylerve evebeynleri tarafından özellikle büyümegelişim döneminde farkedilmektedir.Günümüzde iskelestel sınıf III anomalilerintedavisinde sıklıkla yüz maskesikullanılmaktadır. Konvansiyonel yüz maskesiuygulaması, ankraj ünitesi ile bireyin vertikalyönde büyümesinde istenmeyen değişimlereneden olabilmektedir. Bu noktada istenmeyendentoalveolar etkileri en aza indirmekamacıyla maksilla protraksiyonu, yüzmaskesinin iskeletsel ankraj üniteleri ilebirlikte kullanımıyla elde edilebilmektedir. Buolgu sunumunun amacı büyüme gelişimdöneminde olan maksiller yetmezliğe bağlısınıf III anomaliye sahip bireyin mini-plakankrajlı yüz maskesi uygulaması ile iskeletsel,dentoalveolar ve yumuşak dokudakideğişimlerinin sunulmasıdır.
KW  - İskeletsel sınıf III
KW  - maksiller
yetmezlik
KW  - iskeletsel ankraj
N2  - Individuals and parents arenoticed by skeletal class III anomalies, whichare typically characterized by maxillaryinsufficiency, especially during the growth anddevelopment due to the influence of social andenvironmental factors. Today, in the treatmentof skeletal class III anomalies, face masks arefrequently used. Conventional application ofthe face mask may cause undesirable changesin the growth of the individual with theanchorage unit in the vertical direction. At thispoint, it is possible to achieve maxillaprotraction by using the face mask togetherwith skeletal anchorage units to minimizeundesired dentoalveolar effects. The aim ofthis case report is to present, by applying aface mask with mini-plate anchorage, theskeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changesof an individual with class III anomaly due tomaxillary insufficiency in the growth anddevelopment period.
CR  - 1. Williams S, Andreasen CE. The
Morphology of Potential Class III Skeletal
Pattern in Growing Child. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 89: 302-11.
CR  - 2. Ellis E, McNamara JA Jr. Components of
Adult Class III Malocclusion. J Oral
Maxillofac Surg. 1984;42(5):295-305.
CR  - 3. Joshi N, Hamdan AM, Fakhouri WD.
Skeletal Malocclusion: a Developmental
Disorder with a Life-long Morbidity. J Clin
Med Res. 2014;6(6):399-408.
CR  - 4. Bernabé E, Sheiham A, de Oliveira CM.
Condition-specific Impacts on Quality of Life
Attributed to Malocclusion by Adolescents
with Normal Occlusion and Class I, II and III
Malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):977-
82.
CR  - 5. Kaya D, Kocadereli I, Kan B, Tasar F.
Effects of Facemask Treatment Anchored with
Miniplates After Alternate Rapid Maxillary
Expansions and Constrictions; a pilot study.
Angle Ortho. 2011;81: 639-46.
CR  - 6. Şar Ç, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı
AC. Comparative Evaluation of Maxillary
Protraction with or without Skeletal
Anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2011;139: 636-49.
CR  - 7. Vaughn GA, Mason B, Moon HB, Turley
PK. The Effects of Maxillary Protraction
Therapy with or without Rapid Palatal
Expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.
2005;128(3):299-309.
CR  - 8. Kilicoglu, H. and Kirlic, Y. Profile Changes
in Patients with Class III Malocclusions After
Delaire Mask Therapy. American Journal of
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.
1998; 113(4): 453-462.
CR  - 9. Ngan, P. Early Timely Treatment of Class
III Malocclusion. Seminars in Orthodontics.
2005;11(3):140–145.
CR  - 10. Zhou YH, Ding P, Lin Y, Qiu LX.
Facemask Therapy with Miniplate Implant
Anchorage in a Patient with Maxillary
Hypoplasia. Chin Med J. 2007;120(15):1372-
5.
CR  - 11. Delaire J. Maxillary Development
Revisited: Relevance to the Orthopaedic
Treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J
Orthod. 1997;19 (3):289- 311.
CR  - 12. Hegmann M, Rüther AK. The Grummons
Face Mask as an Early Treatment Modality
within a Class III Therapy Concept. J Orofac
Orthop. 2003;64(6):450-6.
CR  - 13. Nanda R. Biomechanical and Clinical
Considerations of a Modified Protraction
Headgear. Am J Orthod. 1980;78(2): 125-139.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/vdj/issue//1321886
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3240229
ER  -