TY - JOUR T1 - Sıcak İklim Koşullarında Linda Kazları ve Yerli Kazların (Anserınae sp.) Yumurta Verimi ve Doğal Kuluçka Performansı Üzerine Bir Araştırma TT - A Study on Egg Productivity and Natural Hatching Performance of Linda Geese and Domestic Geese (Anserinae Sp.) Under Hot Climate Conditions AU - Yurtseven, Sabri AU - Kaya, Zeliha AU - Çetin, Mehmet PY - 2024 DA - June Y2 - 2024 DO - 10.31196/huvfd.1420104 JF - Harran University Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine JO - Harran Univ Vet Fak Derg PB - Harran Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-7188 SP - 42 EP - 47 VL - 13 IS - 1 LA - tr AB - Bu çalışma, Türk yerli kazları ve Linda kazlarının yumurta verimi, yumurtlama periyodu, bazı yumurta özellikleri ve doğal kuluçka yeteneklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmada, Linda kazları bir yumurtlama periyodu boyunca Yerli kazlara oranla daha fazla yumurta üretmişlerdir. Ancak, bazı yumurta kalite özellikleri açısından Yerel kazların daha üstün olduğu görülmüştür. Farklı iki genotip, doğal kuluçka özellikleri açısından da incelenmiştir. Yerli kazlar, Linda kazlarına göre daha ağır yumurtalar üretmişler ve yumurta kabuk kalınlığı, yumurta uzunluğu ve yumurta hacmi gibi özellikler bakımından daha üstün özellikler göstermişlerdir. Yerli kazların, doğal kuluçka özellikleri açısından diğer genotipten daha iyi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak, Yerel kazların yumurtlama dönemi Linda kazlarına göre bir ay daha kısa olmuş ve yaklaşık olarak iki ay sürmüştür. Yumurta verimi bakımından, Yerli genotip Linda kazlarıyla rekabet edemese de Linda kazının, bazı doğal kaz davranışları, annelik içgüdüleri, kuluçka esnasında yumurtalarına sahip çıkma ve kuluçkaya yatma (gurk olma) vb. gibi özellikler bakımından Yerli kazlardan daha geri olduğu gözlenmiştir. KW - Doğal kuluçka KW - Linda kazı KW - Yerli kaz KW - Yumurta özellikleri KW - Yumurta verimi N2 - This study aimed to determine the egg production, laying period, some egg characteristics, and natural incubation abilities of Turkish native and Linda geese. In the study, Linda geese produced more eggs during a laying period than native geese. However, native geese were found to be superior in some egg quality characteristics. Two different genotypes were also investigated in terms of natural incubation traits. Native geese produced heavier eggs than Linda geese and exhibited superior characteristics in terms of eggshell thickness, egg length, and egg volume. It was determined that native geese were better in terms of natural incubation traits compared to the other genotype. However, the laying period of native geese was one month shorter than that of Linda geese and lasted approximately two months. In terms of egg production, while the native genotype cannot compete with the Linda geese, it has been observed that the Linda goose is inferior to the native geese in certain natural goose behaviors, such as maternal instincts, guarding eggs during incubation, and brooding. CR - Anonim, 1987: Tarım Bakanlığı: Kars, Erzurum, Ağrı illeri Kaz Yetiştiriciliğini Geliştirme Projesi. Tarım Bakanlığı, Proje ve Uygulama Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye. CR - Arroyo CL, 1990: Specific gravity, weight, and the percentage of shell, white and yolk in goose eggs. Agronomía Costarricense, 14 (1),99-102. CR - Arslan C, Saatçi M, 2003: Egg yield and hatching characteristics of local Kars geese. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 27, 1361-1365. CR - Biesiada-Drzazga B, Banaszewska D, Koncerewicz A, Jozwik A, Horbanczuk J, 2015: Examination of changes in selected external and internal egg traits during the geese laying season and their effect on gosling hatching results. Eur Poult Sci, 79, 1-11. CR - Dawson RD, Clark RG, 2000: Effects of hatching date and egg size on growth, recruitment and adult size of lesser scaup. The Condor, 102, 930- 935. CR - Kucharska-Gaca J, Adamski M, Biesek J, 2022: Effect of parent flock age on hatching, growth rate, and features of both sexes goose carcasses. Poult Sci, 101: 101920. CR - El-Hanoun AM, Attia YA, AL-Harthi MA, Habiba HI, Oliveira MC, 2017a: Magnetized drinking water improves productivity and blood parameters in geese. Rev Colomb Cienc Pecu, 30, 209-218. CR - El-Hanoun AM, Attia YA, Gad HAM, Abdella MM, 2012: Effect of different managerial systems on productive and reproductive traits, blood plasma hormones and biochemical constituents of geese. Animal, 6 (11), 1795-1802. CR - El-Hanoun AM, Wesam AF, Attia YA. 2017b: Effect of magnetized wall water on Blood components, Immune indices and Semen quality of Egyptian male geese. Egypt Poult Sci, 37 (I), 91-103. CR - Gönül T, Yücelyiğit E, Aksu M, Kapucu A, 1995: Kars goose production station inspection report. Turkish Development Foundation. Ankara, Türkiye. CR - Kaya Z, Yurtseven S, 2021: Effects of feeding systems on yield and performance of Linda geese Anserinae sp. in hot climatic conditions. S Afr J Anim Sci, 51 (5), 628-634. CR - Liu HW, Zhou DW, 2013: Influence of pasture intake on meat quality, lipid oxidation, and fatty acid composition of geese. J Anim Sci, 91, 764-771. CR - Guo B, Li D, Zhou B, Jiang Y, Bai H, Zhang Y, Xu Q, Yongzhang, Chen G, 2020: Effect of diet with different proportions of ryegrass on breast meat quality of broiler geese. Poult Sci, 99 (5), 2500-2507. CR - Orhan H, Erensayın C, Aktan S, 2001: Japon bıldırcınlarında (Coturnix coturnix japonica) farklı yaş gruplarında yumurta kalite özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Hayvansal Üretim, 42 (1), 44-49. CR - Reuter YS, 2012: State and the main directions of work with the Lindsovlike geese. XVII International Conference, WPSA, Innovative Developments and Their Development in Industrial Poultry Farming P. 95-97; Sergiev Posad, Russia. CR - Saatci M, Kırmızıbayrak T, Aksoy AR, Tilki M, 2005: Egg weight, shape index and hatching weight and interrelationships among these traits in Native Turkish geese with different coloured feathers. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 29, 353-357. CR - Sarı M, Buğdaycı KE, Akbaş AA, Saatci M, Oğuz MN, 2019: The effect of laying period on egg quality traits and chemical composition of Lindovskaya Linda geese reared under breeder conditions. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 43, 662-669. CR - Tilki M, İnal Ş, 2004: Quality traits of goose eggs. 1. Effects of goose age and storage time of eggs. Eur Poult Sci, 68, 182-186. CR - Tserveni-Goussi A, Fortomaris P, 2011: Production and quality of quail, pheasant, goose and turkey eggs for uses other than human consumption. Improving the Safety and Quality of Eggs and Egg Products. Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition, 509-537. CR - TÜİK, 2022: Turkey Statistical Institute. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p = Hayvansal-%C3%9Cretim-%C4%B0statistikleri-Aral%C4%B1k-2021-45593&dil, Erişim tarihi: 15.11.2022. UR - https://doi.org/10.31196/huvfd.1420104 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3661226 ER -