TY  - JOUR
T1  - GELİR VE SERVET DAĞILIMI TEMELİNDE MÜLKİYET SAHİPLİ DEMOKRASİ VE UYGULANABİLİRLİĞİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA
TT  - A RESEARCH ON PROPERTY-OWNING DEMOCRACY AND ITS APPLICABILITY ON THE BASIS OF INCOME AND WEALTH DISTRIBUTION
AU  - Örün, Emre
AU  - Eren, Ercan
PY  - 2024
DA  - April
Y2  - 2024
DO  - 10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1420851
JF  - Akademik Hassasiyetler
PB  - Hüzeyfe Süleyman ARSLAN
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-5933
SP  - 500
EP  - 535
VL  - 11
IS  - 24
LA  - tr
AB  - Gelir ve servetin adil bir şekilde dağılımı ve eşitsizliğin bireysel özgürlük üzerindeki etkisi ile ilgili tartışmalar 18. yüzyıl ve 19. yüzyıla kadar gitmektedir. Ekonomik eşitsizlik bireyleri sadece ekonomik anlamda değil aynı zamanda sosyal yaşam alanındaki bireysel özgürlüklerini de etkilemektedir. Bu bağlamda, eşitsizlik üzerine yapılan çalışmaların sadece ekonomik değil sosyal açıdan da değerlendirilmesi önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmada gelir ve servet dağılımı tartışmaları mülkiyet sahipli demokrasi özelinde incelenmiştir. Ayrıca, ekonomik eşitsizlik temelinde mülkiyet sahipli demokrasinin kökenlerinin hangi düşünürlere kadar uzandığı araştırılmaktadır. Çalışmanın bir diğer odak noktası mülkiyet sahipli demokrasi rejiminin uygulanabilirliği üzerine inceleme yapılmasıdır. Mülkiyet sahipli demokrasinin uygulanabilirliği bağlamında Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, İspanya ve Polonya’daki işçi sahipli firmalar ve işçi kooperatifleri temelinde örnekler incelenmiştir. Literatür incelemeleri sonucunda mülkiyet sahipli demokrasinin kökenlerinin Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Paine ve John Stuart Mill’e kadar uzandığı ortaya konulmuştur. İşçi sahipli firmalar ve işçi kooperatifleri üzerine ülke örnekleri temelinde yapılan araştırmalar mülkiyet sahipli demokrasinin uygulanabilirliğinin mümkün olduğu çıkarımının yapılabilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır.
KW  - John Rawls
KW  - Mülkiyet Sahipli Demokrasi
KW  - Liberal Demokratik Sosyalizm
KW  - İşçi Sahipli Firma
KW  - İşçi Kooperatifi
N2  - Discussions on the equitable distribution of income and wealth, as well as the impact of inequality on individual freedom, have been ongoing since the 18th and 19th centuries. Economic inequality affects individuals not just economically, but also in terms of their freedoms in social life. Thus, it is crucial to assess studies on inequality from both economic and social perspectives. This study analyzes debates on income and wealth distribution within the framework of property-owning democracy. Furthermore, it explores the origins of property-owning democracy in the context of economic inequality. An additional focus of this study is the examination of the feasibility of the property-owning democracy regime. Examples of worker-owned firms and worker cooperatives in the United States, Spain, and Poland are scrutinized to assess the viability of property-owning democracy. The literature review indicates that the concept of property-owning democracy traces its roots to Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Paine, and John Stuart Mill. The examination of worker-owned firms and worker cooperatives, based on case studies from specific countries, leads to the conclusion that implementing a property-owning democracy is indeed feasible.
CR  - Allen, D. (2021). Time for new philosophical foundations for economic theory? O. Blanchard, & D. Rodrik (Ed.), Combating inequality: Rethinking goverment’s role içinde (s. 41-48). The MIT Press.
CR  - Bernardi, A. & Tridico, P. (2021). What is organizational inequality? Why is it increasing as macroeconomic inequality increases? Capital & Class, 45(3), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820959791
CR  - Blasi, J., Scharf, A. & Kruse, D. (2023). Employee ownership in the US: Some issues on ESOPs – overcoming the barriers to further development. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-11-2022-0028
CR  - Canavan, F. (1987). Thomas Paine. L. Strauss, & J. Cropsey (Ed.), History of political philosophy içinde (s. 680-686). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
CR  - Christiansen, C. O., & L.B.Jensen, S. (2019). Histories of global inequality: Introduction. C. O. Christiansen, & S. L.B.Jensen (Ed.), Histories of global inequality: New perspectives içinde (s. 1-32). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
CR  - COCETA. (2021). Informe de Gestion. Madrid: Confederación Española de Cooperativas de Trabajo Asociado.
CR  - Conti, G. (2021). John Stuart Mill and modern liberalism: A study in contrasts. Constellations, 28(3), 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12533
CR  - Cowen, N. (2021). Neoliberal social justice: Rawls unveiled. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
CR  - Dorfman, J. (1938). The economic philosophy of Thomas Paine. Political Science Quarterly, 53(3), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2143819
CR  - Douglass, R. (2019). Inequality. E. Grace, & C. Kelly (Ed.), The rousseauian mind içinde (s. 308-318). New York: Routledge.
CR  - Employee Ownership Foundation. (2020). Employee-owned firm in the covid-19 pandemic: How majority-owned esop & other companies have responded to the covid-19 health and economic crises. Washington: Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations.
CR  - Eren, E. (2021). Eşitlikçi liberalizm üzerine düşünceler. İktisat ve Toplum, (130), 117-126.
CR  - Gaus, G. (2017). Mill’s normative economics. C. Macleod, & D. E. Miller (Ed.), A companion to Mill içinde (s. 488-503). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
CR  - Jackson, B. (2012). Property-owning democracy: A short history. M. O’Neill & T. Williamson (Ed.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond içinde (s. 33-52). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
CR  - Kamosiński, S. (2017). Employee companies as a form of dissemination of ownership within the period of state enterprises privatization in Poland since 1990. Revue des Sciences Politiques, (54), 59-69.
CR  - Kerr, G. (2015). ‘Predistribution’, property-owning democracy and land value taxation. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 15(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X15573458
CR  - Kerr, G. (2017). The property owning democracy: Freedom and capitalism in the twenty-first century. New York: Routledge.
CR  - Kerr, G. (2021). Freedom, recognition, and the property-owning democracy: Towards a predistributive model of justice. D. Celentano, & L. Caranti (Ed.), Paradigms of justice: Redistribution, recognition, and beyond içinde (s. 27-45). New York: Routledge.
CR  - Marangos, J. (2008). Thomas Paine (1737-1809) and Thomas Spence (1750-1814) on land ownership, land taxes and the provision of citizens’ dividend. International Journal of Social Economics, 35(5), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290810861576
CR  - Marcuello, C. (2023). Employee ownership in Spain: Worker cooperatives and sociedades laborales. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(2), 149-165. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-10-2022-0022
CR  - Mathieu, M. (2008-2023). Annual economic survey of employee ownership in european countries 2007-2023. Brussels: European Federation of Employee Share Ownership.
CR  - McCabe, H. (2021). John Stuart Mill: Market socialist? Review of Social Economy, 79(3), 506-527. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2020.1781923
CR  - Meade, J. E. (1949a). Planning and the price mechanism. New York: The Macmillan Company.
CR  - Meade, J. E. (1949b). Next steps in domestic economic policy. The Political Quarterly, 20(1), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1949.tb01838.x
CR  - Meade, J. E. (2012). Efficiency, equality and the ownership of property. New York: Routledge.
CR  - Mill, J. S. (1965). Principles of political economy with some of their applications to social philosophy. London: University of Toronto Press.
CR  - Mill, J. S. (1969). Essays on ethics, religion and society. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
CR  - Mill, J. S. (1982). Essays on England, Ireland, and the empire. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
CR  - Miller, D. E. (2003). Mill’s ‘socialism’. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 2(2), 213-238. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X03002002004
CR  - Mygind, N. (2023). Overcoming barriers of employee ownership in France, Italy, Spain, the UK and the US. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(3), 230-263. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-10-2022-0026
CR  - National Center for Employee Ownership. (2023). Employee ownership by the numbers. 20 Eylül 2023 tarihinde https://www.nceo.org/ adresinden edinilmiştir.
CR  - Nuti, D. M. (2005). Employee ownership in polish privatizations. P. Hare, J. Batt & S. Estrin (Ed.), Reconstituing the market: The political economy of microeconomic transformation içinde (s. 77-93). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.
CR  - O’Neill, M. (2009). Liberty, equality and property-owning democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 379-396.
CR  - O’Neill, M. (2020). Social justice and economic systems: On Rawls, democratic socialism, and alternatives to capitalism. Philosophical Topics, 48(2), 159-202.
CR  - Paine, T. (1945a). Agrarian justice. P. S. Foner (Ed.), The complete writings of Thomas Paine içinde (s. 605-624). New York: The Citadel Press.
CR  - Paine, T. (1945b). Rights of man. P. S. Foner (Ed.), The complete writings of Thomas Paine içinde (s. 243-344). New York: The Citadel Press.
CR  - Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. London: Harvard University Press.
CR  - Rawls, J. (2005). A theory of justice. London: Harvard University Press.
CR  - Ron, A. (2008). Visions of democracy in ‘property-owning democracy’: Skelton to Rawls and beyond. History of Political Thought, 29(1), 168-187.
CR  - Rosen, C. (2023). Employee ownership in the USA: Lessons to consider in creating more inclusive capitalism. Journal of Participation and Employee Ownership, 6(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPEO-11-2022-0029
CR  - Rosen, C. & Quarrey, M. (1987). How well is employee ownership working? Harvard Business Review.
CR  - Rousseau, J.-J. (1997a). The social contract and other later political writings. (V. Gourevitch, Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - Rousseau, J.-J. (1997b). The discourses and other early political writings. (V. Gourevitch, Ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - Skelton, N. (1923, Mayıs 19). Constructive Conservatism IV: Democracy Stabilised. The Spectator Archive: http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/19th-may-1923/5/constructive-conservatism-ivdemocracy-stabilized adresinden edinilmiştir.
CR  - Stafford, W. (1998). How can a paradigmatic liberal call himself a socialist? The case of John Stuart Mill. Journal of Political Ideologies, 3(3), 325-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569319808420784
CR  - Thomas, A. (2012). Rawls, Adam Smith, and an argument from complexity to property-owning democracy. The Good Society, 21(1), 4-20. https://doi.org/10.5325/goodsociety.21.1.0004
CR  - Thomas, A. (2017). Republic of equals: predistribution and property-owning democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
CR  - Ward, L. (2022). Thomas Paine on agrarian justice and reparations. The Political Science Reviewer, 46(2), 25-56.
CR  - Wiefek, N. (2017). Employee ownership & economic well-being. Oakland: National Center for Employee Ownership.
CR  - Williamson, T. (2009). Who owns what? An egalitarian ınterpretation of John Rawls’s idea of a property-owning democracy. Journal of Social Philosophy, 40(3), 434-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9833.2009.01461.x
CR  - Williamson, T. (2012). Realizing property-owning democracy: A 20-year strategy to create an egalitarian distribution of assets in the united states. M. O’Neill, & T. Williamson (Ed.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond içinde (s. 225-248). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
CR  - Winch, D. (2004). Review essay: Mill as romantic idealist. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26(4), 543-555.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.58884/akademik-hassasiyetler.1420851
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3664435
ER  -