TY  - JOUR
T1  - Which Is Superior in Creating Scientific Article Titles in Plastic Surgery: Human Intelligence or Artificial Intelligence?
AU  - Yıldıran, Gokce
AU  - Demirtas, Sare
AU  - Akdeniz, Hande
AU  - Tosun, Zekeriya
PY  - 2025
DA  - April
Y2  - 2024
DO  - 10.54005/geneltip.1460859
JF  - Genel Tıp Dergisi
JO  - Genel Tıp Derg
PB  - Selçuk Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2602-3741
SP  - 222
EP  - 225
VL  - 35
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - Aim: This study explores the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) versus human expertise in generating scientific article titles within the context of plastic surgery. Acknowledging the pivotal role titles play in attracting readership and conveying a study's significance, this research investigates whether AI can match or surpass human capability in crafting compelling titles for academic articles. Material and Methods: Utilizing a sample of original articles from the Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Journal, published in January and February 2023, the study employs OpenAI's ChatGPT to generate alternative titles based on article abstracts. A survey among plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery experts, with a blinded setup regarding the origin of the titles (AI-generated or original), facilitates the comparison. Statistical analysis, including t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test, assesses preferences across general and specific subject areas within plastic surgery. Results: Findings indicate a predominant preference for original titles, yet in certain subjects like hand/peripheral nerve surgery, AI-generated titles were more favored. On the other hand, in experimental and cosmetic subjects original titles were more favored. Conclusion: The study highlights the potential and limitations of AI in academic creativity, suggesting a nuanced view where AI's effectiveness varies by subject matter, such as experimental and cosmetic subjects. It concludes that while AI exhibits competence in title generation, human oversight remains crucial, especially in areas requiring deep expertise and nuanced understanding. This investigation contributes to the discourse on AI's role in academic publishing, emphasizing the need for balanced integration of AI tools in the scientific communication process.
KW  - Artifical intelligence
KW  - article
KW  - plastic surgery
KW  - title
CR  - 1.	DuBose J, Marshall D. AI in academic writing: Tool or invader. Public Services Quarterly 2023; 19:125-130
CR  - 2.	Storey VA. AI Technology and Academic Writing: Knowing and Mastering the “Craft Skills”. IJAET 2023; 14:1-15
CR  - 3.	https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/pages/default.aspx
CR  - 4.	Lund BD, Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library hi tech news 2023; 40: 26-29
CR  - 5.	Lo CK. What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences 2023; 13:410
CR  - 6.	Dergaa I, Chamari K, Zmijewski P, Ben Saad H. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol Sport 2023; 40:615-622
CR  - 7.	Thorp HH. ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science 2023; 379:313-313
CR  - 8.	Huang J, Tan M. The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: writing better scientific review articles. American journal of cancer research 2023; 13:1148
CR  - 9.	Bavdekar SB. Formulating the right title for a research. Journal of the Association of Physicians of India 2016; 64:53-56
CR  - 10.	Bowman D, Kinnan S. Creating effective titles for your scientific publications. VideoGIE 2018; 3:260-261
CR  - 11.	Putra JWG, Khodra ML. Automatic title generation in scientific articles for authorship assistance: a summarization approach. Journal of ICT Research and Applications 2017; 11:253-267
UR  - https://doi.org/10.54005/geneltip.1460859
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3830219
ER  -