TY  - JOUR
T1  - FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PLACEMENT FAILURE OF SECOND-GENERATION LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY: A RETROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY
TT  - İkinci jenerasyon Laringeal Maske yerleştirme başarısızlığıyla ilişkili faktörler: Retrospektif bir klinik çalışma
AU  - İzgin Avcı, İpek
AU  - Arslan Aydın, Zehra İpek
AU  - Avcı, İbrahim Erkut
PY  - 2025
DA  - February
Y2  - 2024
DO  - 10.53446/actamednicomedia.1486989
JF  - Acta Medica Nicomedia
JO  - Acta Med Nicomedia
PB  - Kocaeli Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2717-8994
SP  - 5
EP  - 10
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - Objective: The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is important for airway management during anesthesia practice. Rarely, when it cannot be placed, it requires alternative interventions. In this study, we aimed to identify factors associated with second-generation LMA placement failure.Methods: Between 2021 and 2023, medical records of consecutive patients who underwent ureteroscopy for urolithiasis under general anesthesia were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were: age
KW  - Laryngeal Mask Airway
KW  - difficult
KW  - urogenital surgery
KW  - adult
N2  - Amaç: Laringeal maske hava yolu (LMA), anestezi uygulaması sırasında hava yolu yönetimi açısından önemlidir. Nadiren yerleştirilemediğinde alternatif müdahaleler gerektirir. Bu çalışmada ikinci nesil LMA yerleştirme başarısızlığıyla ilişkili faktörleri belirlemeyi amaçladık.Yöntem: 2021-2023 yılları arasında genel anestezi altında ürolitiazis nedeniyle üreteroskopi yapılan ardışık hastaların tıbbi kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hariç tutma kriterleri şunlardı: yaş
CR  - Brimacombe J. The advantages of the LMA over the tracheal tube or facemask: a meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42(11):1017-23. doi: 10.1007/BF03011075.
CR  - Brain AIJ. The laryngeal mask—a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth. . 1983;55(8):801-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.8.801.
CR  - Caplan R, Benumof J, Berry F. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1269-77. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00032.
CR  - Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(6):827-48. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371.
CR  - Tartari S, Fratantonio R, Bomben R. Laryngeal mask vs tracheal tube in pediatric anesthesia in the presence of upper respiratory tract infection. Minerva Anestesiol. 2000;66(6):439-43.
CR  - Jamil SN, Alam M, Usmani H. A study of the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in children and its comparison with endotracheal intubation. Indian J Anaesth. 2009;53(2):174.
CR  - Buckham M, Brooker M, Brimacombe J. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999;27(6):628-31. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9902700612.
CR  - Katsiampoura AD, Killoran PV, Corso RM. Laryngeal mask placement in a teaching institution: analysis of difficult placements. F1000Res. 2015;4. doi:10.12688/f1000research.6415.1.
CR  - Ramachandran SK, Mathis MR, Tremper KK. Predictors and clinical outcomes from failed Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique™: a study of 15,795 patients. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(6):1217-26. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318255e6ab.
CR  - Di Filippo A, Adembri C, Paparella L. Risk factors for difficult Laryngeal Mask Airway LMA-Supreme™(LMAS) placement in adults: a multicentric prospective observational study in an Italian population. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87:533-40. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.15001-6.
CR  - Law JA, Duggan LV, Asselin M. Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 2. Planning and implementing safe management of the patient with an anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68(9):1405-36. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02008-z.
CR  - Orozco-Díaz É, Álvarez-Ríos JJ, Arceo-Díaz JL. Predictive factors of difficult airway with known assessment scales. Cir Cir. 2010;78(5):393-9.
CR  - Almeida G, Costa A, Machado H. Supraglottic airway devices: a review in a new era of airway management. J Anesth Clin Res. 2016;7(1):2155-61.
CR  - Endlich Y, Hore PJ, Baker PA. Updated guideline on equipment to manage difficult airways: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2022;50(6):430-46. doi: 10.1177/0310057X221082664.
CR  - Shariffuddin II, Chaw SH, Ng LW. Clinical performance of the LMA Protector™ airway in moderately obese patients. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01100-z.
CR  - Weng M, Ding M, Xu Y. An evaluation of thyromental distance-based method or weight-based method in determining the size of the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized controlled study. Medicine. 2016;95(9). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002902.
CR  - Chen J, Chen C, Xu W. Size selection of the Ambu AuraOnce laryngeal mask in Chinese men weighing> 70 kg: a pilot study. J Int Med Res. 2021;49(5):03000605211016689. doi: 10.1177/03000605211016689.
CR  - Vannucci A, Rossi IT, Prifti K. Modifiable and nonmodifiable factors associated with perioperative failure of extraglottic airway devices. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(6):1959-67. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002659.
CR  - Ravi R, Mohan V, Badhe AS. Comparison of weight-based and pinna size–based selection of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in paediatric population–A prospective exploratory trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(1):36. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_423_18.
CR  - Aghadavoudi O, Shetabi H, Saryazdi H. Assessment of neck characteristics for laryngeal mask airway size selection in patients who underwent an elective ocular surgery; A cross-sectional study. Bull Emerg Trauma. 2022;10(2):77. doi: 10.30476/BEAT.2022.94356.1338.
CR  - Saito T, Liu W, Chew S. Incidence of and risk factors for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device in a population of 14 480 patients from South‐East Asia. Anaesthesia. 2015;70(9):1079-83. doi: 10.1111/anae.13153.
CR  - Saito T, Chew S, Liu W. A proposal for a new scoring system to predict difficult ventilation through a supraglottic airway. Br J Anaesth.. 2016;117(suppl 1):i83-i6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew191.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.53446/actamednicomedia.1486989
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3942780
ER  -