TY  - JOUR
T1  - Türkiye'de Açık Dergi Sistemlerinde Yayımlanan Kütüphane ve Bilgi Bilim Dergilerinin Dijital Koruma Durumu: Fatcat Tabanlı Bir Analiz
TT  - Digital Preservation Status of Library and Information Science Journals Published in Open Journal Systems in Turkey: A Fatcat-Based Analysis
AU  - Yayla, Kemal
PY  - 2024
DA  - December
Y2  - 2024
DO  - 10.33721/by.1541321
JF  - Bilgi Yönetimi
JO  - BY
PB  - Ankara Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2636-8544
SP  - 252
EP  - 271
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
LA  - tr
AB  - Bu çalışma, Türkiye'deki Kütüphane ve Bilgi Bilim alanında Açık Dergi Sistemleri (OJS) kullanılarak yayınlanan açık erişimli dergilerin dijital koruma durumlarını ve akademik içeriklerin sürümlenmiş ve kamuya açık olarak düzenlenebilir kataloğu olan Fatcat'teki görünürlüklerini incelemektedir. Araştırmada, Türk Kütüphaneciliği (TK) ve Bilgi Dünyası (BD) dergileri karma yöntemle analiz edilmiştir. OJS sistemlerindeki içerik, Fatcat'teki verilerle nicel olarak karşılaştırılmış, dergilerin dijital koruma politikaları doküman analizi ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular, TK dergisinin dijital içeriğinin %67,44'üne, BD dergisinin ise %26'sına Internet Archive üzerinden erişilebildiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, TK dergisinin Fatcat'teki görünürlük oranı %55,58, BD dergisinin ise %33,33 olarak belirlenmiştir. Her iki derginin de belirlenmiş bir dijital koruma stratejisi olduğu, ancak erişilebilirlik ve sürdürülebilirlik açısından iyileştirme gerektiren alanlar bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, Türkiye'deki akademik dergilerin ulusal platformlarda depolanmasının dijital koruma politikalarına olumlu katkı sağladığını, ancak uluslararası koruma sistemlerine entegrasyonun yetersiz kaldığını ortaya koymaktadır. TK ve BD dergilerinin uluslararası dijital koruma sistemlerine dahil edilmesi ve veri aktarım süreçlerinin geliştirilmesi önerilmektedir. Gelecekteki araştırmaların, diğer akademik alanlardaki dergilerin dijital koruma stratejilerini inceleyerek Türkiye’deki durumu daha kapsamlı bir şekilde değerlendirmesi önerilmektedir.
KW  - Fatcat
KW  - Dijital Koruma Politikası
KW  - Açık Erişim Dergiler
N2  - This study examines the digital preservation status and visibility in Fatcat—a versioned and publicly editable catalog of academic content—of open-access journals published using Open Journal Systems (OJS) in Turkey's Library and Information Science field. A mixed-methods approach was employed to analyze two prominent journals: Türk Kütüphaneciliği (TK) and Bilgi Dünyası (BD). Content hosted on OJS platforms was quantitatively compared with data in Fatcat, while the journals' digital preservation policies were scrutinized through document analysis. Findings reveal that 67.44% of TK's digital content and 26% of BD's content are accessible via the Internet Archive. Additionally, the visibility rates of TK and BD in Fatcat were determined to be 55.58% and 33.33%, respectively. While both journals have established digital preservation strategies, areas requiring improvement were identified, particularly regarding accessibility and long-term sustainability. The study indicates that archiving academic journals on national platforms in Turkey positively contributes to digital preservation efforts; however, integration with international preservation systems remains insufficient. It is recommended that TK and BD be incorporated into international digital preservation systems and that data transfer processes be enhanced. Future research should aim to assess the situation in Turkey more comprehensively by examining the digital preservation strategies of journals across various academic disciplines.
CR  - Aslan, A. (2019). TR Dizin. Acta Medica Alanya, 3(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.30565/medalanya.557393
CR  - Baudoin, P. (2003). Uppity bits: Coming to terms with archiving dynamic electronic journals. The Serials Librarian, 43(4), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v43n04_06
CR  - Becerril, A., Bosman, J., Bjørnshauge, L., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., Mounier, P., Proudman, V., Redhead, C., ve Torny, D. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 2: Recommendations. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4562790
CR  - Beh, E., ve Smith, J. (2012). Preserving the scholarly collection: An examination of the perpetual access clauses in the Texas A&M university libraries’ major E-journal licenses. Serials Review, 38(4), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2012.10765472
CR  - Belenkuyu, C. ve Karadağ, E. (2024). Better than not starting? Research university project of Turkey. Studies in Higher Education, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2328829
CR  - Bequet, G. (2022a). From the cradle to the digital vault: Tracking the path of e-journals. The Serials Librarian, 82(1-4), 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2022.2028498
CR  - Bequet, G. (2022b). Journals preserved or how to turn Diamond into JASPER. Insights the UKSG Journal, 35, 15. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.591
CR  - Bilgi Dünyası. (t.y.). Arşivleme [OJS]. içinde Bilgi Dünyası. Erişim tarihi: 06 Ağustos 2024.  https://bd.org.tr/index.php/bd/journalPolicy
CR  - Björk, B.-C., Shen, C., ve Laakso, M. (2016). A longitudinal study of independent scholar-published open access journals. PeerJ, 4, e1990. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1990
CR  - Burnhill, P. (2013). Tales from the Keepers Registry: Serial issues about archiving & the web. Serials Review, 39(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2013.10765481
CR  - Carr, P. L. (2011). The commitment to securing perpetual journal access: A survey of academic research libraries. Library Resources & Technical Services, 55(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.55n1.4
CR  - Choi, H. N., ve Park, E. G. (2007). Preserving perpetual access to electronic journals: A Korean consortial approach. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 31(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2007.10766142
CR  - Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research (2. bs). Sage Publications.
CR  - Day, M. (2008). Preserving the outputs of scholarly communication for the long-term: A review of recent developments in digital preservation for electronic journal content. İçinde W. Jones (Ed.), E-Journals Access and Management (ss. 39-64). Routledge. https://www.ukoln.ac.uk/preservation/publications/2008/e-journals/draft-v01.pdf
CR  - DergiPark. (t.y.). DergiPark DOI Hizmeti. İçinde DergiPark Akademik. Erişim tarihi: 22 Ekim 2024. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/page/doi-hizmeti
CR  - DOAJ. (2014). DOAJ publishes lists of journals added and withdrawn. https://blog.doaj.org/2014/05/22/doaj-publishes-lists-of-journals-removed-and-added
CR  - DoBell, D. (2008). Chipping away at academic capitalism through open access. International Journal of the Book, 5(2), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9516/CGP/v05i02/36697
CR  - Dylla, F. (2014). CHORUS–A solution for public access. Information Services & Use, 34(3-4), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-140740
CR  - Enoch, T., ve Harker, K. R. (2015). Planning for the Budget-ocalypse: The Evolution of a Serials/ER Cancellation Methodology. The Serials Librarian, 68(1-4), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2015.1025657
CR  - Eve, M. P. (2024). Digital scholarly journals are poorly preserved: A study of 7 million articles. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/jlsc.16288
CR  - fatcat. (2024). Fatcat! fatcat!. https://fatcat.wiki/about
CR  - Fenton, E. G. (2008). Responding to the preservation challenge: Portico, an electronic archiving service. Journal of Library Administration, 48(1), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930820802029169
CR  - Flecker, D. (2001). Preserving scholarly e-journals. D-Lib Magazine, 7(9), 1082-9873. https://doi.org/10.1045/september2001-flecker
CR  - Fyfe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., ve Mørk Røstvik, C. (2017). Untangling academic publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Birkbeck Institutional Research Online. 
https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/19148/1/UntanglingAcPub.pdf
CR  - Halliday, L., ve Oppenheim, C. (2001). Developments in digital journals. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 260-283. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007102
CR  - Kenney, A. R., Entlich, R., Hirtle, P. B., McGovern, N. Y., ve Buckley, E. L. (2006). E-Journal Archiving Metes and Bounds. Council on Library and Information Resources. https://www.clir.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/pub138.pdf
CR  - Kiefer, R. S. (2015). Digital preservation of scholarly content, focusing on the example of the CLOCKSS Archive. Insights the UKSG Journal, 28(1), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.215
CR  - Kim, S., ve Choi, H. (2019). Status of digital standards, licensing types, and archiving policies in Asian open access journals registered in Directory of Open Access Journals. Science Editing, 6(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.154
CR  - Kirchhoff, A. J. (2008). Digital preservation: Challenges and implementation. Learned Publishing, 21(4), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108X356716
CR  - Kirchhoff, A. J. (2009). Expanding the preservation network: Lessons from Portico. Library Trends, 57(3), 476-489. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.0.0048
CR  - Laakso, M., Matthias, L., ve Jahn, N. (2021). Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(9), 1099-1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24460
CR  - Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., ve Hedlund, T. (2011). The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
CR  - Lawson, S., Gray, J., ve Mauri, M. (2016). Opening the black box of scholarly communication funding: A public data infrastructure for financial flows in academic publishing. Open Library of Humanities, 2(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.72
CR  - Lightfoot, E. A. (2016). The persistence of open access electronic journals. New Library World, 117(11/12), 746-755. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-08-2016-0056
CR  - Maniatis, P., Roussopoulos, M., Giuli, T. J., Rosenthal, D. S. H., ve Baker, M. (2005). The LOCKSS peer-to-peer digital preservation system. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, 23(1), 2-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1047915.1047917
CR  - Marijanović, B., ve Stančić, H. (2023). Digital archiving policies of central european journals registered in the directory of open access journals. Libri, 73(1), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2021-0034
CR  - McGuigan, G. S. (2004). Publishing perils in academe: The serials crisis and the economics of the academic journal publishing industry. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, 10(1), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1300/J109v10n01_03
CR  - McGuigan, G. S., ve Russell, R. D. (2008). The business of academic publishing: A strategic analysis of the academic journal publishing industry and its impact on the future of scholarly publishing. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship, 9(3). 
http://southernlibrarianship.icaap.org/content/v09n03/mcguigan_g01.html
CR  - Mering, M. (2015). Preserving electronic scholarship for the future: An overview of LOCKSS, CLOCKSS, Portico, CHORUS, and the Keepers Registry. Serials Review, 41(4), 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2015.1099397
CR  - Morrison, H. (2016). Small scholar‐led scholarly journals: Can they survive and thrive in an open access future? Learned Publishing, 29(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1015
CR  - Moulaison, H. L., ve Million, A. J. (2015). E-publishing in libraries: The [digital] preservation imperative. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 31(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0009
CR  - Ndungu, M. W. (2020). Publishing with open journal systems (OJS): A Librarian’s perspective. Serials Review, 46(1), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2020.1732717
CR  - Niu, Y., ve Li, H. (2017). Progress report on the role of digital resource preservation and utilization for libraries in China. Publishing Research Quarterly, 33(4), 483-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-017-9544-1
CR  - Olivarez, J., Bales, S., Sare, L., ve van Duinkerken, W. (2018). Format aside: Applying beall’s criteria to assess the predatory nature of both OA and non-OA library and information science journals. College & Research Libraries, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.1.52
CR  - Oppenheim, C., Greenhalgh, C., ve Rowland, F. (2000). The future of scholarly journal publishing. Journal of Documentation, 56(4), 361-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007119
CR  - Potts, J., Hartley, J., Montgomery, L., Neylon, C., ve Rennie, E. (2017). A journal is a club: A new economic model for scholarly publishing. Prometheus, 35(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2017.1386949
CR  - Ratner, H., Dylla, H. F., ve Crotty, D. (2014). CHORUS – providing a scalable solution for public access to scholarly research. Insights: the UKSG journal, 27(1), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.129
CR  - Regan, S. (2016). Strategies for expanding e-journal preservation. The Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2016.1144159
CR  - Reich, V. (2008). CLOCKSS—it takes a community. The Serials Librarian, 54(1-2), 135-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/03615260801973968
CR  - Reich, V., ve Rosenthal, D. S. (2001). LOCKSS: A permanent web publishing and access system. D-Lib Magazine, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1045/june2001-reich
CR  - Rosenthal, D. S., Vargas, D. L., Lipkis, T. A., ve Griffin, C. T. (2015). Enhancing the LOCKSS digital preservation technology. D-Lib Magazine, 21(9/10), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1045/september2015-rosenthal
CR  - Roussopoulos, M., ve Bungale, P. (2010). Stealth modification versus nuisance attacks in the LOCKSS peer-to-peer digital preservation system. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 3(4), 265-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-009-0055-5
CR  - Seadle, M. (2006). A social model for archiving digital serials: LOCKSS. Serials Review, 32(2), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00987913.2006.10765034
CR  - Seadle, M. (2011). Archiving in the networked world: By the numbers. Library Hi Tech, 29(1), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831111117001
CR  - Shah, U. U., ve Gul, S. (2019). LOCKSS, CLOCKSS & PORTICO: A look into digital preservation policies. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2481. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2481
CR  - Smith, K. (2008). Institutional repositories and E-journal archiving: What are we learning? The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3998/3336451.0011.107
CR  - Sprout, B., ve Jordan, M. (2018). Distributed digital preservation: Preserving open journal systems content in the PKP PN. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(4), 246-261. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-11-2017-0043
CR  - Stemper, J., ve Barribeau, S. (2006). Perpetual access to electronic journals. Library Resources & Technical Services, 50(2), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.50n2.91
CR  - Tavernier, W., Westervelt, T., ve Carlson, A. J. (2021). Where do we keep that? The new keepers registry and the digital content in your collection. The Serials Librarian, 80(1-4), 155-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2021.1865020
CR  - Teddlie, C., ve Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research. içinde N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (C. 4, ss. 285-300). Sage Publications.
CR  - Türk Kütüphaneciliği. (2024). Etik ilkeler ve yayın politikası. Türk Kütüphaneciliği. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tk/policy
CR  - Waller, A., ve Bird, G. (2006). “We own it”: Dealing with “perpetual access” in big deals. The Serials Librarian, 50(1-2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v50n01_17
CR  - Willinsky, J. (2005). The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science. First Monday. https://doi.org/2013
CR  - Wittenberg, K., Glasser, S., Kirchhoff, A., Morrissey, S., ve Orphan, S. (2018). Challenges and opportunities in the evolving digital preservation landscape: Reflections from Portico. Insights the UKSG Journal, 31, 28. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.421
CR  - Zhang, M., ve Eschenfelder, K. R. (2014). License analysis of e-journal perpetual access. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(1), 62-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.11.002
UR  - https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1541321
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4181024
ER  -