TY  - JOUR
T1  - Factors Affecting the Integration of Micromobility into Smart Cities and Effects on Urban Transport
TT  - Mikromobilitenin Akıllı Şehirlere Entegrasyonunu Etkileyen Faktörler ve Şehir İçi Ulaşıma Etkileri
AU  - Eyüboğlu, Merve
AU  - Kabakuş, Nuriye
PY  - 2025
DA  - March
Y2  - 2025
DO  - 10.51513/jitsa.1603010
JF  - Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi
JO  - Jitsa
PB  - Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2636-820X
SP  - 170
EP  - 183
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
LA  - en
AB  - In the transport of the future, the development of smart cities and the use of micromobility vehicles play an important role in terms of sustainability and efficiency. Micromobility vehicles such as electric scooters, bicycles and e-mopeds provide environmental, economic and social benefits by offering an important alternative in urban transport. However, many factors need to be considered for the successful integration of these vehicles. The aim of this paper is to analyse the main factors affecting the integration of micromobility vehicles into urban transport systems. In this paper, 9 sub-criteria under 6 main criteria affecting the integration of micromobility vehicles are considered and the relationships between these criteria are analysed by DEMATEL method. As a result of the analysis, the importance ranking of the criteria related to micromobility vehicles is determined as follows: roads reserved for micromobility vehicles, integration of micromobility vehicles with public transport, accidents, legislation deficiencies, lighting and signing, accessibility to micromobility vehicles, digital literacy level, effects of micromobility vehicles on environmental sustainability and fuel cost. The study makes an important contribution towards better understanding the impacts of micromobility vehicles on urban transport and identifying important factors to be considered in the integration process.
KW  - micromobility vehicles
KW  - smart cities
KW  - DEMATEL method
N2  - Geleceğin ulaşımında, akıllı şehirlerin gelişimi ve mikromobilite araçlarının kullanımı, sürdürülebilirlik ve verimlilik açısından önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. Elektrikli scooter, bisiklet ve e-moped gibi mikromobilite araçları, şehir içi ulaşımda önemli bir alternatif sunarak çevresel, ekonomik ve toplumsal faydalar sağlamaktadır. Ancak, bu araçların başarılı entegrasyonu için birçok faktörün dikkate alınması gerekmektedir. Bu makalenin amacı, mikromobilite araçlarının şehir içi ulaşım sistemlerine entegrasyonunu etkileyen temel faktörleri analiz etmektir. Makalede, mikromobilite araçlarının entegrasyonunu şekillendiren 6 ana kriter altında 9 alt kriter ele alınmış ve bu kriterler arasındaki ilişkiler DEMATEL yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda, mikromobilite araçlarıyla ilgili kriterlerin önem sıralaması şu şekilde belirlenmiştir: mikromobilite araçları için ayrılmış yollar, mikromobilite araçlarının toplu taşıma ile entegrasyonu, kazalar, mevzuat eksiklikleri, ışıklandırma ve işaretlendirmeler, mikromobilite araçlara erişilebilirlik, dijital okuryazarlık seviyesi mikromobilite araçlarının çevresel sürdürülebilirliğe etkileri ve yakıt maliyetidir. Çalışma, mikromobilite araçlarının şehir içi ulaşım üzerindeki etkilerini daha iyi anlamaya ve entegrasyon sürecinde dikkate alınması gereken önemli faktörleri belirlemeye yönelik önemli bir katkı sunmaktadır.
CR  - Aguilera-García, Á., Gómez, J., Sobrino, N. (2020). Exploring the adoption of moped scooter-sharing systems in spanish urban areas. Cities, 96, 102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.102424
CR  - Bajec, P., Tuljak-Suban, D., & Zalokar, E. (2021). A distance-based ahp-dea super-efficiency approach for selecting an electric bike sharing system provider: one step closer to sustainability and a win–win effect for all target groups. Sustainability, 13(2), 549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020549
CR  - Bylieva, D., Lobatyuk, V., & Shestakova, I. (2022). Shared micromobility: between physical and digital reality. Sustainability, 14(4), 2467. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042467
CR  - Felipe-Falgas, P., Madrid‐López, C., Marquet, O. (2022). Assessing environmental performance of micromobility using lca and self-reported modal change: the case of shared e-bikes, e-scooters, and e-mopeds in barcelona. Sustainability, 14(7), 4139. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074139
CR  - Flores, P. and Jansson, J. (2021). The role of consumer innovativeness and green perceptions on green innovation use: the case of shared e‐bikes and e‐scooters. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1466-1479. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1957
CR  - Fonseca-Cabrera, A., Llopis-Castelló, D., Zuriaga, A., Alonso-Troyano, C., García, A. (2021). Micromobility users’ behaviour and perceived risk during meeting manoeuvres. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(23), 12465. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182312465
CR  - Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, innovative methods. Report no. 2 structural analysis of the world problematique. Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 67-69.
CR  - Fontela, E., Gabus, A. (1976).  The DEMATEL observer: Battelle Institute. Geneva Research Center, 56-61.
CR  - Güler, E., Avcı, S., Aladağ, Z. (2022). DEMATEL-SWARA yöntemleri ile geçisi barınma alanlarının seçimine etki eden kriterlerin değerlendirilmesi. UMUFED International Journal of Western Black Sea Engineering and Science, 4(2), 57-74.
CR  - Hassam, S., Alpalhão, N., Neto, M. (2024). A spatiotemporal comparative analysis of docked and dockless shared micromobility services. Smart Cities, 7(2), 880-912. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020037
CR  - Jafarzadehfadaki, M. and Sisiopiku, V. (2024). Embracing urban micromobility: a comparative study of e-scooter adoption in washington, d.c., miami, and los angeles. Urban Science, 8(2), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci8020071
CR  - Karpinski, E., Bayles, E., Sanders, T. (2022). Safety analysis for micromobility: recommendations on risk metrics and data collection. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2676(12), 420-435. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221095523
CR  - Koçak, A. and Diyadin, A. (2018). Sanayi 4.0 geçiş süreçlerinde kritik başarı faktörlerinin DEMATEL yöntemi ile değerlendirilmesi. Ege academic review, 18(1), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2018132203
CR  - Li, C.W., Tzeng, G.H. (2009). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36: 9891–9898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073
CR  - Marques, D. and Coelho, M. (2022). A literature review of emerging research needs for micromobility—integration through a life cycle thinking approach. Future Transportation, 2(1), 135-164. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp2010008
CR  - McQueen, M., Abou-Zeid, G., MacArthur, J., Clifton, K. (2020). Transportation transformation: is micromobility making a macro impact on sustainability? Journal of Planning Literature, 36(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220972696
CR  - Moch, N. and Wereda, W. (2020). Smart security in the smart city. Sustainability, 12(23), 9900. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239900
CR  - Munhoz, P., Dias, F., Chinelli, C., Guedes, A., Santos, J., Silva, W., Soares, C. (2020). Smart mobility: the main drivers for increasing the intelligence of urban mobility. Sustainability, 12(24), 10675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410675
CR  - Nilashi, M., Zakaria, R., Ibrahim, O., Majid, M., Zin, R., ve Farahmand, M. (2015). MCPCM: A DEMATEL-ANPBased Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Evaluate the Critical Success Factors in Construction Projects. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 40(2): 343-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1529-1
CR  - Pérez-Zuriaga, A., Llopis-Castelló, D., Just-Martínez, V., Fonseca-Cabrera, A., Alonso-Troyano, C., García, A. (2022). Implementation of a low-cost data acquisition system on an e-scooter for micromobility research. Sensors, 22(21), 8215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218215
CR  - Rześny-Cieplińska, J., Tomaszewski, T., Piecyk-Ouellet, M., Kiba-Janiak, M. (2023). Emerging trends for urban freight transport–the potential for sustainable micromobility. Plos One, 18(9), e0289915. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289915
CR  - Sanjurjo-de-No, A. (2023). Factors influencing the pedestrian injury severity of micromobility crashes. Sustainability, 15(19), 14348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914348
CR  - Štefancová, V., Kalašová, A., Čulík, K., Mazanec, J., Vojtek, M., Masek, J. (2022). Research on the impact of covid-19 on micromobility using statistical methods. Applied Sciences, 12(16), 8128. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12168128
CR  - Stehlin, J. and Payne, W. (2022). Disposable infrastructures: ‘micromobility’ platforms and the political economy of transport disruption in austin, texas. Urban Studies, 60(2), 274-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980221091486
CR  - Sun, S. and Ertz, M. (2022). Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions: evidence from urban transportation big data. Sustainable Cities and Society, 85, 104045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.104045
CR  - Tamagusko, T., Correia, M., Rita, L., Bostan, T., Peliteiro, M., Martins, R., Ferreira, A. (2023). Data-driven approach for urban micromobility enhancement through safety mapping and intelligent route planning. Smart Cities, 6(4), 2035-2056. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6040094
CR  - Wu W., Lee, Y. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEl method. Expert Syst. Appl., 32(2), ss. 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
UR  - https://doi.org/10.51513/jitsa.1603010
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4447189
ER  -