TY  - JOUR
T1  - Akut Aşil Tendon Rüptürlerinde Konservatif Tedavi, Perkütan ve Açık Cerrahinin Klinik Sonuçlarının Karşılaştırılması
TT  - Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Conservative Treatment, Percutaneous, and Open Surgery in Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures.
AU  - Öktem, Umut
AU  - Daştan, Muhammed Cihan
AU  - Harmankaya, Ahmet Muhammed
AU  - Bozkurt, İbrahim
AU  - Akkurt, Mehmet Orçun
PY  - 2025
DA  - September
Y2  - 2025
JF  - Bozok Tıp Dergisi
PB  - Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2146-4006
SP  - 354
EP  - 359
VL  - 15
IS  - 3
LA  - tr
AB  - Amaç: Bu çalışma, akut Aşil tendonu rüpütürlerinin tedavisinde konservatif, perkütan ve açık cerrahi yaklaşımların klinik sonuçlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır.Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışma, 2019 ve 2023 yılları arasında Ankara Bilkent Şehir HastanesiOrtopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniğinde Kuwada Tip 2 akut Aşil tendonu rüpütürü tanısı alan 50 hastayı içermektedir. Hastalar tedavi yöntemine göre üç gruba ayrılmıştır: konservatif (n = 14), perkütan tamir (n = 21) veaçık cerrahi tamir (n = 15). Fonksiyonel sonuçlar, Amerikan Ortopedik Ayak ve Ayak Bileği Derneği (AOFAS)skoru ve Görsel Analog Skala (VAS) skorları kullanılarak tedavi sonrası 3., 6. ve 12. aylarda değerlendirilmiştir.İstatistiksel analizler Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır.Bulgular: 3. ay VAS skorları, konservatif ve perkütan gruplara kıyasla açık cerrahi grubunda anlamlı olarakdaha yüksek bulunmuştur (p = 0,038). Ancak, 6. ve 12. ay VAS skorları arasında gruplar arasında anlamlı birfark bulunmamıştır. AOFAS skorlarının 3., 6. ve 12. aylarda gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı birfark göstermediği görülmüştür. Komplikasyonlar, açık cerrahi grubunda iki hastada (yara problemleri) vekonservatif grupta bir hastada (yeniden rüpütür) gözlemlenmiştir.Sonuç: Kuwada tip 2 akut aşil tendon rüptürü olan hastalarda uygulanan konservatif tedavi, perkütan tamirve açık cerrahinin klinik sonuçlar açısından birbirlerine üstünlüğü yoktur ancak açık cerrahi tedavinin postoperatif erken dönem ağrı skorları açısından dezavantajlı olduğu görülmüştür. Açık cerrahi tamir, özellikle aktifbireyler için güvenilir bir yöntem olarak kalmaya devam etmektedir.
KW  - aşil tendonu
KW  - tendon yaralanmaları
KW  - minimal invaziv cerrahi işlemler
N2  - Objective: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of conservative, percutaneous, and open surgical approaches in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures.Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 50 patients diagnosed with Kuwada Type 2 acuteAchilles tendon rupture between 2019 and 2023 at the Orthopedics and Traumatology Clinic of Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. Patients were divided into three groups according to the treatment method: conservative(n = 14), percutaneous repair (n = 21), and open surgical repair (n = 15). Functional outcomes were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment using the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS)score and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. Statistical analyses were performed using Kruskal-Wallis tests.Results: At the 3rd month, VAS scores were found to be significantly higher in the open surgery group compared to the conservative and percutaneous groups (p = 0.038). However, no significant differences wereobserved among the groups in VAS scores at 6 and 12 months. AOFAS scores showed no statistically significant differences among the groups at 3, 6, and 12 months. Complications were observed in two patients(wound problems) in the open surgery group and in one patient (re-rupture) in the conservative group.Conclusion: In patients with Kuwada Type 2 acute Achilles tendon rupture, conservative treatment, percutaneous repair, and open surgery show no superiority over one another in terms of clinical outcomes.However, open surgical treatment appears to be disadvantageous regarding postoperative early pain scores.Open surgical repair remains a reliable option, particularly for active individuals.
CR  - 1. Park SH, Lee HS, Young KW, Seo SG. Treatment of Acute Achilles
Tendon Rupture. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):1-8.
CR  - 2. Meulenkamp B, Woolnough T, Cheng W, Shorr R, Stacey D, Richards
M, et al. What Is the Best Evidence to Guide Management of Acute
Achilles Tendon Ruptures? A Systematic Review and Network Meta
Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Clin Orthop Relat Res.
2021;479(10):2119-31.
CR  - 3. Fischer S, Colcuc C, Gramlich Y, Stein T, Abdulazim A, von Welck
S, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial of open operative,
minimally invasive and conservative treatments of acute Achilles
tendon tear. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(5):751-60.
CR  - 4. Seow D, Yasui Y, Calder JDF, Kennedy JG, Pearce CJ. Treatment of
Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses
for Rerupture Rates. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49(13):3728-48.
CR  - 5. Yang B, Liu Y, Kan S, Zhang D, Xu H, Liu F, et al. Outcomes and
complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles
tendon rupture: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;40:178-86.
CR  - 6. Bunnell S. Repair of nerves and tendons of the hand. J Bone Joint
Surg 1928;10:1–26.
CR  - 7. Shi F, Wu S, Cai W, Zhao Y. Multiple comparisons of the efficacy and
safety for six treatments in Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture patients:
A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg.
2021;27(5):468-79.
CR  - 8. Li Y, Jiang Q, Chen H, Xin H, He Q, Ruan D. Comparison of miniopen repair system and percutaneous repair for acute Achilles
tendon rupture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22(1):914.
CR  - 9. Gatz M, Driessen A, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Migliorini F. Open
versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a
meta-analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021;141(3):383-
401.
CR  - 10. Idarraga AJ, Bohl DD, Barnard E, Movassaghi K, Hamid KS, Schiff
AP. Adverse Events Following Minimally Invasive Achilles Tendon
Repair. Foot & Ankle Specialist. 2022;15(3):236-43.
CR  - 11. Lawson J, Tarapore R, Sequeira S, Imbergamo C, Tarka M,
Guyton G, et al. Open and Percutaneous Approaches Have
Similar Biomechanical Results for Primary Midsubstance Achilles
Tendon Repair: A Meta-analysis. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil.
2024;6(3):100924.
CR  - 12. Attia AK, Mahmoud K, d'Hooghe P, Bariteau J, Labib SA, Myerson
MS. Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive
Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and
Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Sports Med.
2023;51(3):825-36.
CR  - 13. Subaşı İÖ, Çepni Ş, Tanoğlu O, Veizi E, Alkan H, Yapici F et
al. A clinical comparison of two different surgical techniques in
the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: Limited-open
approach vs. percutaneous approach. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg.
2023;29(8):935-43.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/bozoktip/issue//1628013
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4556838
ER  -