TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Salt Stress Tolerance in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Cultivars Under Hydroponic Conditions TT - Evaluation of Salt Stress Tolerance in Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) Cultivars Under Hydroponic Conditions AU - Aydın, Alim PY - 2025 DA - September Y2 - 2025 DO - 10.34248/bsengineering.1663621 JF - Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science JO - BSJ Eng. Sci. PB - Karyay Karadeniz Yayımcılık Ve Organizasyon Ticaret Limited Şirketi WT - DergiPark SN - 2619-8991 SP - 1339 EP - 1348 VL - 8 IS - 5 LA - en AB - Salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stress factors that significantly negatively affect plant growth and yield. This study evaluated the morphological and physiological responses of eight lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties to salt stress under hydroponic conditions. The lettuce varieties were grown in an aerated hydroponic system under control (1.8 dS/m) and salt stress (6.0 dS/m) conditions. The results showed that salt stress caused significant reductions in shoot biomass, particularly compared to root biomass characteristics. The varieties with the greatest reductions in biomass parameters under salt stress conditions were Chicarita, Triplex, and Levistro, while Baeza and Cherokee produced higher biomass. Morphological characteristics such as leaf number, stem diameter, plant height, and leaf area were also significantly affected by salt stress, with leaf area—the edible part of the lettuce—being the most affected by salt stress. As with other parameters, the Baeza, Kireve, and Cherokee varieties were more stable in these parameters. The Chicarita variety again showed the lowest performance in these parameters. Leaf color parameters such as L, a*, b*, chroma, and hue angle were significantly affected by salt stress. Under salt stress conditions, the Expedition and Kireve varieties had more vibrant colors than other varieties. Chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, and total chlorophyll content increased in some varieties due to salt stress, while they decreased in others. Salt stress generally increased leaf sap EC and SSC values. The effect of salt stress on fruit juice pH was not statistically significant. In conclusion, salt stress negatively affected shoot parameters in lettuce varieties, while in some varieties it caused an increase in root morphology. These differences in response to salt stress are related to stress adaptation ability, so the parameters used in this study can be used as selection criteria for lettuce or other plants. Additionally, the varieties identified as salt-tolerant in this study can be used in breeding programs aimed at growing plants under saline conditions. KW - Lettuce KW - Salt stress KW - Chlorophyll KW - Leaf color N2 - Salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stress factors that significantly negatively affect plant growth and yield. This study evaluated the morphological and physiological responses of eight lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties to salt stress under hydroponic conditions. The lettuce varieties were grown in an aerated hydroponic system under control (1.8 dS/m) and salt stress (6.0 dS/m) conditions. The results showed that salt stress caused significant reductions in shoot biomass, particularly compared to root biomass characteristics. The varieties with the greatest reductions in biomass parameters under salt stress conditions were Chicarita, Triplex, and Levistro, while Baeza and Cherokee produced higher biomass. Morphological characteristics such as leaf number, stem diameter, plant height, and leaf area were also significantly affected by salt stress, with leaf area—the edible part of the lettuce—being the most affected by salt stress. As with other parameters, the Baeza, Kireve, and Cherokee varieties were more stable in these parameters. The Chicarita variety again showed the lowest performance in these parameters. Leaf color parameters such as L, a*, b*, chroma, and hue angle were significantly affected by salt stress. Under salt stress conditions, the Expedition and Kireve varieties had more vibrant colors than other varieties. Chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, and total chlorophyll content increased in some varieties due to salt stress, while they decreased in others. Salt stress generally increased leaf sap EC and SSC values. The effect of salt stress on fruit juice pH was not statistically significant. In conclusion, salt stress negatively affected shoot parameters in lettuce varieties, while in some varieties it caused an increase in root morphology. These differences in response to salt stress are related to stress adaptation ability, so the parameters used in this study can be used as selection criteria for lettuce or other plants. Additionally, the varieties identified as salt-tolerant in this study can be used in breeding programs aimed at growing plants under saline conditions. CR - Adhikari B, Olorunwa OJ, Wilson JC, Barickman TC, Di Toppi LS, Hasanuzzaman M, Adhikari T. 2021. Morphological and physiological response of different lettuce genotypes to salt stress. Stresses, 1(4): 285–304. CR - Ahmed S, Ahmed S, Roy SK, Woo SH, Sonawane KD, Shohael AM. 2019. Effect of salinity on the morphological, physiological and biochemical properties of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) in Bangladesh. Open Agric, 4(1): 361–373. CR - Arnon DI. 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol, 24(1): 1–15. CR - Ashraf M, Akram NA. 2009. Improving salinity tolerance of plants through conventional breeding and genetic engineering: An analytical comparison. Biotechnol Adv, 27(6): 744–752. CR - Ashraf M, Harris PJC. 2013. Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview. Photosynthetica, 51(2): 163–190. CR - Aydın A, Yetişir H. 2022. Rootstock effect of auto- and allotetraploid citron (Citrullus lanatus var. citroides) on hydroponically grown cucumber under salt stress. Gesunde Pflanzen, (in press): 1–14. CR - Aydın A. 2024. The growth, leaf antioxidant enzymes and amino acid content of tomato as affected by grafting on wild tomato rootstocks (S. pimpinellifolium and S. habrochaites) under salt stress. Sci Hortic, 325: 113843. CR - Barassi CA, Ayrault G, Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Sobrero MT. 2006. Seed inoculation with Azospirillum mitigates NaCl effects on lettuce. Sci Hortic, 109(1): 8–14. CR - Başak H, Aydın A, Yetişir H, Turan M. 2025. Salt stress effects on hybrid bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) rootstock candidates plant growth, hormones and nutrient content. J Crop Health, 77(1): 1–23. CR - Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK. 2005. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci, 45(2): 437–448. CR - Eraslan F, Inal A, Savasturk O, Gunes A. 2007. Changes in antioxidative system and membrane damage of lettuce in response to salinity and boron toxicity. Sci Hortic, 114(1): 5–10. CR - Hussain S, Shaukat M, Ashraf M, Zhu C, Jin Q, Zhang J. 2019. Salinity stress in arid and semi-arid climates: Effects and management in field crops. Clim Change Agric. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.87982 CR - Kaya C, Higgs D, Sakar E. 2002. Response of two leafy vegetables grown at high salinity to supplementary potassium and phosphorus during different growth stages. J Plant Nutr, 25(12): 2663–2676. CR - Mariani L, Ferrante A. 2017. Agronomic management for enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic stresses—drought, salinity, hypoxia, and lodging. Horticulturae, 3(4): 5. CR - Mohammadi P, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH. 2014. The effectiveness of synthetic zinc (Zn)-amino chelates in supplying Zn and alleviating salt-induced damages on hydroponically grown lettuce. Sci Hortic, 172: 117–123. CR - Moncada A, Miceli A, Sabatino L, Iapichino G, D’Anna F, Vetrano F. 2018. Effect of molybdenum rate on yield and quality of lettuce, escarole, and curly endive grown in a floating system. Agronomy, 8(9): 171. CR - Moncada A, Miceli A, Vetrano F. 2021. Use of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and organic fertilization for soilless cultivation of basil. Sci Hortic, 275: 109714. CR - Moncada A, Vetrano F, Miceli A. 2020. Alleviation of salt stress by plant growth-promoting bacteria in hydroponic leaf lettuce. Agronomy, 10(10): 1523. CR - Muhammad HMD, Abbas A, Ahmad R. 2022. Fascinating role of silicon nanoparticles to mitigate adverse effects of salinity in fruit trees: a mechanistic approach. Silicon, 14(14): 8319–8326. CR - Munns R, Gilliham M. 2015. Salinity tolerance of crops – what is the cost? New Phytol, 208(3): 668–673. CR - Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 59: 651–681. CR - Munns R. 2011. Plant adaptations to salt and water stress: Differences and commonalities. Adv Bot Res, 57: 1–32. CR - Özdemir M. 2001. Mathematical analysis of color changes and chemical parameters of roasted hazelnuts. MSc Thesis, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Türkiye. http://hdl.handle.net/11527/16764 CR - Parida AK, Das AB. 2005. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 60(3): 324–349. CR - Pérez-López U, Miranda-Apodaca J, Muñoz-Rueda A, Mena-Petite A. 2013. Lettuce production and antioxidant capacity are differentially modified by salt stress and light intensity under ambient and elevated CO2. J Plant Physiol, 170(17): 1517–1525. CR - Rao KVM, Raghavendra AS, Reddy KJ. 2006. Physiology and molecular biology of stress tolerance in plants. Physiol Mol Biol Stress Toler Plants, 1–345. CR - Rouphael Y, Petropoulos SA, Cardarelli M, Colla G. 2018. Salinity as eustressor for enhancing quality of vegetables. Sci Hortic, 234: 361–369. CR - Sakadevan K, Nguyen ML. 2010. Extent, impact, and response to soil and water salinity in arid and semiarid regions. Adv Agron, 109(C): 55–74. CR - Settanni L, Miceli A, Francesca N, Cruciata M, Moschetti G. 2013. Microbiological investigation of Raphanus sativus L. grown hydroponically in nutrient solutions contaminated with spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol, 160(3): 344–352. CR - Shi M, Gu J, Wu H, Rauf A, Emran T Bin, Khan Z, Mitra S, Aljohani ASM, Alhumaydhi FA, Al-Awthan YS, Bahattab O, Thiruvengadam M, Suleria HAR. 2022. Phytochemicals, nutrition, metabolism, bioavailability, and health benefits in lettuce – a comprehensive review. Antioxidants (Basel), 11(6): 1159. CR - Shrivastava P, Kumar R. 2015. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci, 22(2): 123–131. CR - Wei Z, Julkowska MM, Laloë JO, Hartman Y, de Boer GJ, Michelmore RW, van Tienderen PH, Testerink C, Schranz ME. 2014. A mixed-model QTL analysis for salt tolerance in seedlings of crop-wild hybrids of lettuce. Mol Breed, 34(3): 1389–1400. CR - Yamaguchi T, Blumwald E. 2005. Developing salt-tolerant crop plants: Challenges and opportunities. Trends Plant Sci, 10(12): 615–620. CR - Zhao CY, Si JH, Feng Q, Deo RC, Yu TF, Li P, Du Y. 2017. Physiological response to salinity stress and tolerance mechanics of Populus euphratica. Environ Monit Assess, 189(11): 574. CR - Zhu JK. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 53: 247–273. UR - https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1663621 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4716338 ER -