@article{article_1707312, title={PREDICTIVE POLICING: BALANCING CRIME PREVENTION AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS}, journal={Periodicum Iuris}, volume={3}, pages={343–373}, year={2025}, author={Maviş, Volkan}, keywords={Öngörücü polislik, önleyici polislik, suç öngörüsü, suç önleme, PredPol}, abstract={Crime prediction is not a new concept in the effort to prevent criminal activities before they occur. However, with the help of technological advancements, the use of predictive techniques by law enforcement agencies has increased significantly, aiming to reduce crime and improve resource efficiency. Despite these perceived advantages, the idea of crime prediction must be approached with great caution due to its exploitable nature. In this respect, the paper highlights significant concerns related to its effectiveness, transparency, and ethical implications, as demonstrated by previous experiences. Particular attention must be given to the risks of biased data, algorithmic opacity, and the violation of fundamental rights such as privacy and the presumption of innocence. Drawing from examples in the United States and Europe, the paper argues that although predictive policing may offer short-term advantages, it poses significant long-term threats to democratic accountability, public trust, and social equity if not properly regulated and critically evaluated.}, number={2}, publisher={Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi}