TY - JOUR T1 - SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR VE EKOLOJİK MEKÂN TASARIMI BİLİNCİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİNE YÖNELİK BİR STÜDYO DENEYİMİ TT - A STUDIO EXPERIENCE FOR DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE AND ECOLOGICAL SPACE DESIGN AWARENESS AU - İmert, Hakan AU - Fitoz, İpek PY - 2025 DA - June Y2 - 2025 DO - 10.20488/sanattasarim.1718038 JF - Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi PB - Anadolu Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-9059 SP - 587 EP - 607 VL - 15 IS - 1 LA - tr AB - Günümüzde mimarlık mesleği, küresel ısınma ve çevresel krizlerin oluşturduğu zorluklarınodağında olan bir disiplindir. Söz konusu zorlukların aşılmasında sürdürülebilir ve ekolojikmekân tasarımı bilincinin mimarlık eğitimi süreçlerinde geliştirilmesi büyük önemtaşımaktadır. Bu çalışma, Mimarlıkta Ekoloji ve Sürdürülebilir Tasarım (MEST) dersikapsamındaki tasarım stüdyosunda dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanınsınırlı biyoloji bilgisine sahip 16 lisans öğrencisi ile bir dönem sürdürülmüş olmasıve sürece bir biyoloğun dahil edilmemesi çalışmanın sınırlılıklarını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmaiçerisinde iki aşama üzerine oturtulmuş sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik ayak izi matrisiparametreleri ışığında öğrencilerin çıktıları analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, sürdürülebilirve ekolojik ayak izi matrisi parametreleri ile oluşturulmuş basit adımları öğrencilerinprojelerine çeşitli seviyelerde aktardıklarını ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma sonundayapılan metin analizinde ise, güneş, enerji ve su gibi kavramlara öğrenciler tarafındansıklıkla değinildiğinden hareketle çevresel farkındalıklarının arttırıldığı düşünülmektedir.Bu doğrultuda, sürdürülebilir ve ekolojik mekân tasarımı bilincinin oluşturulmasını sağlayacakaraçlardan biri olarak tasarım stüdyosu süreçlerine geleneksel mimarlık yaklaşımları,doğa esinli tasarım ve enerji etkin yapı çıktılarının dahil edilmesinin olumlu katkılarsağlayacağı sonucuna varılmıştır. KW - Ekolojik tasarım KW - Stüdyo deneyimi KW - Sürdürülebilir mimarlık. N2 - In the contemporary era, the field of architecture is situated at the nexus of global warmingand environmental crises. In order to successfully address these challenges, it is ofparamount importance to integrate sustainable and ecological space design awareness intothe architectural education process. This study was conducted with fourth-year studentsenrolled in the design studio as part of the Ecology and Sustainable Design in Architecture(MEST) course. The study is limited in that it was carried out over the course of asemester with a small group of 16 students who lacked sufficient background knowledgein biology and where a biologist was not involved in the process. In this study, the outputsof the students were analysed in accordance with the sustainable and ecological footprintmatrix parameters, which were considered in two stages. The findings indicated that thestudents applied the straightforward steps derived from the sustainable and ecological footprintmatrix parameters to their projects at various levels. The text analysis conductedat the conclusion of the study suggests that environmental awareness has been enhanced,as evidenced by the frequent mention of concepts such as the sun, energy, and water by thestudents. Consequently, it can be posited that the incorporation of traditional architecturalapproaches, nature-inspired design, and energy-efficient building outputs into the designstudio processes serves as a valuable tool for fostering awareness of sustainable and ecologicalspace design. CR - Abram, N. J., McGregor, H. V., Tierney, J. E., Evans, M. N., McKay, N. P., & Kaufman, D. S. (2016). Early onset of industrial-era warming across the oceans and continents. Nature, 536(7617), 411–418. CR - https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19082 CR - Aurandt, J. L., & Butler, E. C. (2011). Sustainability education: approaches for incorporating sustainability into the undergraduate curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 137(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000049 CR - Avcı, A. B., & Beyhan, Ş. G. (2023). Revealing the climate-responsive strategies of traditional houses of Urla, İzmir. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 14(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20230003 CR - Benkari, N. (2013). The “sustainability” paradigm in architectural education in UAE. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.777 CR - Bhamra, T., & Hernandez, R. J. (2021). Thirty years of design for sustainability: an evolution of research, policy and practice. Design Science, 7(Rainey 2006), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.2 CR - Blok, V., & Gremmen, B. (2016). Ecological innovation: biomimicry as a new way of thinking and acting ecologically. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9596-1 CR - Bose, B. K. (2010). Global warming: energy, environmental pollution, and the impact of power electronics. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 4(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIE.2010.935860 CR - Clune, S. (2014). Design for sustainability and the design studio. Fusion Journal, 3, 1–17. https://fusion-journal.com/issue/003-fusion-the-studio/design-for-sustainability-and-the-design-studio/ Datey, A. (2023). Decolonising the design curriculum: making “sustainability” accessible, understandable and practicable to second-year undergraduate architecture students. International Joournal of Architectural Research: Archnet-IJAR. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-10-2022-0228 CR - Guerrero Baca, L. F., & Soria López, F. J. (2018). Traditional architecture and sustainable conservation. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2017-0036 CR - ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 606 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607 CR - Gürel, M. Ö. (2010). Explorations in teaching sustainable design: a studio experience in interior design/architecture. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01649.x Hassan-Montero, Y., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2006). Improving tag-clouds as visual information retrieval interfaces. Information Sciences, I(2), 25–28. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.04947 Helms, M. E., Vattam, S., & Goel, A. K. (2009). Biologically inspired design: process and products. Design Studies, 30, 606–622. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15682971 Ilieva, L., Ursano, I., Traista, L., Hoffmann, B., & Dahy, H. (2022). Biomimicry as a sustainable design methodology - introducing the ‘biomimicry for sustainability’ framework. Biomimetics, 7(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics7020037 CR - İmert, H. (2017). Konaklama mekânlarında ekolojik biçimleniş ve bir tasarım modeli önerisi [Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University]. In Doktora Tezi. tez.yok.gov.tr İmert, H. (2023). Robotik imalat sürecinde bir eşik: icd/itke biyomimetik araştırma pavyonları. Ege Mimarlık, 3(119), 68–73. CR - Keitsch, M. (2012). Sustainable design: a brief appraisal of its main concepts. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1534 Kilmer, W. O., & Kilmer, R. (1992). Designing interiors (1st Editio). Wadsworth Pub Co. CR - Knippers, J., Gabler, M., La Magna, R., Waimer, F., Menges, A., Reichert, S., & Schwinn, T. (2013). From Nature to Fabrication: Biomimetic Design Principles for the Production of Complex Spatial Structures. In Advances in Architectural Geometry 2012 (pp. 107–122). Springer Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1251-9_8 Koch, N. (2023). Sustainability spectacle and ‘post-oil’ greening initiatives. Environmental Politics, 32(4), 708–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2127481 Kurt, S. (2012). Applying constructivist instruction method to basic design course. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 5(5), 253–262. CR - https://search.proquest.com/docview/1355855296/fulltextPDF/8B89EAEF0D1148FFPQ/44?accountid=31562 Lidgren, A., Rodhe, H., & Huisingh, D. (2006). A systemic approach to incorporate sustainability into university courses and curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 797–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.12.011 CR - ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ SANAT & TASARIM DERGİSİ 607 Sanat&Tasarım Dergisi,15 (1), 2025: 587-607 CR - Mohamed, K. E. (2022). An instructive model of integrating sustainability into the undergraduate design studio. Journal of Cleaner Production, 338(March 2021), 130591. CR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130591 CR - Rossin, K. J. (2010). Biomimicry: Nature’s design process versus the designer’s process. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 138, 559–570. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN100501 CR - Sadowski, K. (2021). Implementation of the new european bauhaus principles as a context for teaching sustainable architecture. Sustainability, 13(19), 10715. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910715 CR - Sarhan, A., & Rutherford, P. (2014). Integrating sustainability in the architectural design education process - taxonomy of challenges and guidelines. Proceedings of the 32nd ECAADe Conference, 1, 323–332. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2014.1.323 CR - Sinclair, J., & Cardew-Hall, M. (2008). The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? Journal of Information Science, 34(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506078083 CR - Supran, G., Rahmstorf, S., & Oreskes, N. (2023). Assessing exxonmobil’s global warming projections. Science, 379(6628). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk0063 CR - Torres Parejo, Ú., Campaña, J. R., Vila, M. A., & Delgado, M. (2021). A survey of tag clouds as tools for information retrieval and content representation. Information Visualization, 20(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871620966638 Verbrugghe, N., Rubinacci, E., & Khan, A. Z. (2023). Biomimicry in architecture: a review of definitions, case studies, and design methods. Biomimetics, 8(1), 107. CR - https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8010107 Vitalis, L., & Chayaamor-Heil, N. (2022). Forcing biological sciences into architectural design: On conceptual confusions in the field of biomimetic architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.10.001 CR - Yılmaz, Ş. (2019). Geleneksel ekolojik bilgi bağlamında beypazarı evleri. Milli Folklor, 16(124), 213–229. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/millifolklor/issue/51228/629044 UR - https://doi.org/10.20488/sanattasarim.1718038 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4951980 ER -