TY  - JOUR
T1  - Indications and complications for caesarean section
TT  - Sezeryan olgularımızın endikasyon ve komplikasyonları
AU  - Yaltı, Serap
AU  - Gürbüz, Birgül
AU  - Çakar, Yasemin
AU  - Köse, Deniz
AU  - Balta, Oya
AU  - Yıldırım, Gazi
AU  - Eren, Sadiye
PY  - 2003
DA  - May
DO  - 10.16948/zktb.93029
JF  - Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni
PB  - Zeynep Kamil Kadın ve Çocuk Hastalıkları EAH
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1300-7971
SP  - 9
EP  - 13
VL  - 34
IS  - 4
LA  - tr
AB  - Sezeryan olgularımızın endikasyon ve komplikasyonlan Amaç:Retrospektif olarak gerçekleştirdiğimiz çalışmamızda sezeryan seksiyo ile gebeliği sonlandırılan 2000 olgunun kondisyon, endikasyon ve oluşan komplikasyonlarını irdeledik. Materyal metod: Sezeryan seksiyo uygulanan 2000 olgunun demografik bulguları, antepartum ve postpartum hemoglobin ve hematokrit düzeyleri, sezeryan endikasyon ve komplikasyonlan, intrapartum tubal sterilizasyon oranları, fetüslerin APGAR skorları ve doğum ağırliklan, hastanede kalış süreleri kaydedildi. Bulgular. Sezeryan doğumlar için endikasyonlanmız sırasıyla şu oranlarda saptandı: Eski sezeryan % 40, fetal distress %23, sefalopelvik uygunsuzluk %16.6, makad prezantasyonu %7.7, ikiz gebelik %6.3,uzamış eylem %5, preeclampsi %4.1, dekolman plasenter %3.4, plasenta previa %1.5, kordon sarkması %1.3, gestasyonel diabet %0.4, fetal anomali %0.1.Olgularımız 15-45 yaşları arasında olup, bunlardan %5.7 olgu 20 yaş altında, %57 si 20-30 yaşlan arasında ve % 33.3 ü de 30 yaş üstünde olarak saptandı.Olguların %16.5 i primipar, %83.5 i ise multipar idi. %4.1 i ne kan tmnsfüzyonu yapıldı, %1.3 ünde yara enfeksiyonu,% 0.7 sinde de hematom gözlendi. Son 3 yıl içinde hastanemizde sezeryan oranlan artmış olup; bu oran 2001 yıhnda %23.36, 2002 de %30.77, 2003 de ise %32.99 kaydedilmiştir.
KW  - Sezaryen
KW  - Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar
KW  - Geriyedönük çalışma
KW  - Doğum
KW  - obstetrik
N2  - Objective: Aretrospective surveywas conducted to determine the conditions, indications and complications for caesarean section in 2000 patients. Study Design: 2000 women who undenvent caesarean section in our unit were includedin this study. Standard demographic variables, antepartum and postpartum hemoglobin and hematocritlevels, the indications and complications of caesarean section, intrapartum tubalsterilizationrates, APGAR levels and birth-weights offetuses, the meanlength of staying in hospital were recorded. Resuts: The leading or the major indications rates for abdominal deliveries were: repeat caesarean section 30%, fetal distress 23%, cephalo-pelvic disproportionl6.6%, breechpresantation7.7%, twin pregnancy 6.3%, prolonged labor 5%, preeclampsia 4.1%, placenta previal.5%, abruptio-placentae 3.4%, umblical cordprolapsus 1.3%, gestational diabetes mellitus 0.4, fetal anomalies 0.1%. Age ranged from 15-45 years, 5.70% were women under the age of 20, and 57% were betıveen 20 and 30 years of age and 33.3% were women elder than the age of 30. 16.5% of the mothers were primiparae, 83.5% were multiparae. 4.1% ofthem had blood transfusion. 1.3% had wound infections, 0.7% had hematomas. Analysis of caesarean sections in the last three years showed an increasing rate, from 27.3.6% in 2001 to 30.77% in 2002 and 32.99% in 2003. Conclusion: The proportion of pregnancies delivered by caesarean section increased  for all indications. The matemal morbidity rate following caesarean deliveryis relatively low.
CR  - 1.	Notzon FC, PlacekPf, TaffelSM. Comparison
of national caesarean section rates.N EnglJ Med
1987; 316:386-389
CR  - 2.	Murray SF, Seranı Pradenas F. Caesarean birth
trends in Chile, 1986-1994.Birth 1997; 24: 258-263
CR  - 3.	Nielsen TF, Otterblad Olausson P, Ingemarsson
I.The caesarean section rate in Sweden:the end
of the rise.Birth 1994; 21:1-3
CR  - 4.	Sreevidya S, Sathiyasekaran B.W.C. High
caesarean rates in Madras (India): a population-
based crass sectional study. International Journal
of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2003; 110:106-111
CR  - 5.	MenardMK. Caesarean delivery rates in the US-
the 1990's. Controversies in Labor Management
CR  - Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999;26:275-286
CR  - 6.	US Department of Health and Human Services
CR  - TaskForce-1981. Caesarean Childbirth. National
Institutes of Health Publication No.82-2067, p. 7
CR  - 7.	Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F
CR  - The risk of lowering the cae s are an-de livery rate
CR  - NEnglJ Med 1999; 340: 54-7
CR  - 8.	Backe B, Heggestad T, Lie T.The epidemic of
Caesarean section: has it reached Norway? Tidsskr
NorLaegeforen. 2003 ;11:1522-4
CR  - 9.	Robson MS. Can we reduce the caesarean
section rate? BestPractRes Clin Obstet Gynaecol
CR  - 2001 ; 15:179-94
CR  - 10.	Penn Z, Ghaem-Maghami S. Indications for
caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2001;15:l-15

11.	Gilbert WM, Hicks S M, Boe NM, Daniels en B,
Vaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech
presentation in California: a population-based study
Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102:911-7
CR  - 12.	SchindlM, BirnerP, Reingrabner M, Joura E,
Husslein P, Langer M.Elective cesarean section
vs. spontaneous delivery: a comparative study of
birth experience.Ada Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003
;82:834-40
CR  - 13.	Sikdar K, Kundu S, Mandal GS. Maternal
mortality following caesarean sections.) Obstet
Gynaecol India. 1979;4: 815-23
CR  - 14.	MacKenzie IZ, Cooke I, Annan B.Indications
for caesarean section in a consultant obstetric unit
over three decades.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 ;3:
233-8
CR  - 15.	Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-
adjusted perinatal outcomes .Obstet Gynecol 2003;
6: 1204-12
CR  - 16.	LIT, Rhoads GG, Smulian J,Demissie K,
Wartenberg D, Kruse L. Shiono PH, McNellis
D,Rhoads GG. Reasons for the rising cesarean
delivery rates.1978-1984. Obstet Gynecol 1987;
69: 696- 700
CR  - 17.	Abu-Heija A, el-JalladF, Ziadeh S. Dystocia: is
it a major indication for caesarean section? Clin
Exp Obstet Gynecol. 1998;25:51-3
CR  - 18.	Mikulandra F, Perisa M an at al. When is fetal
macrosomia (>or=4500g) an indication for caesarean
section?Zentralbl  Gynakol.   1996;8:   441-7
CR  - 19.	Fasubaa OB, OgunniyiSO, Dare FO, Isawumi
Al, EzechiOC, OrjiEO.Uncomplicated Caesarean
section: is prolonged hospital stay necessary? East
AfrMedJ. 2000 8: 448-51
UR  - https://doi.org/10.16948/zktb.93029
ER  -