TY  - JOUR
TT  - THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF “DESIGN ISSUE” IN URBAN PLANNING EDUCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHANGING PARADIGMS
AU  - Doğan, Umut
PY  - 2014
DA  - December
JF  - Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
JO  - ERÜSOSBİLDER
PB  - Erciyes Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1300-1582
SP  - 111
EP  - 130
VL  - 1
IS  - 37
KW  - Kent Planlama Eğitimi
KW  - Temel Tasarım
KW  - Kentsel Tasarım
KW  - Planlama Paradigmaları
N2  - The idea of urban planning and implications went back to Neolithic ages when the first urban settlements started. On the other hand, addressing urban planning as an independent educational field is considered to be the beginning of 20th century. The program, firstly established as “civic design” in 1907, describes planning as an approach handling the relationships of items in an aesthetic concept and focusing on “beautification and regulation” with a reformist perspective. With the following periodical changes, the paradigms in the social theory gained urban planning education a multi-dimensional discipline. Under the circumstances of this period, “design” oriented spatial-regulation based planning schools created their education policy accordingly. Consequently, this concept was totally changed and “design” issue has started to become ambiguous especially in education planning. Therefore, this paper discusses the concept of “design issue” in the education programs of planning schools in consideration with the changing paradigms with a special focus on the ambiguity factor. The constant change of urban information makes traditional planning education processes inadequate and requires new approaches. In this new educational process; with the flexibility, creativity, innovation and discussion factors; “design issue” gained a special importance
CR  - American Planning Association (APA), 2007. http://www.planning.org/
CR  - Archer, B., The Need for Design Education, Royal College of Art, 1973.
CR  - Aydemir, S., “Planlama ve Planlamanın Evrimi”, Aydemir, Ş., Aydemir, S., Beyazlı, Ş., D., Ökten, N., Öksüz, A.M., Sancar, C., Özyaba, M., Türk, A., Y., Kentsel Alanların Planlanması ve Tasarımı, Akademi Kitabevi, Trabzon, 2004, 41-99.
CR  - Banham, R., Theory and Design in the First Machine Age, Athaneum Press, Great Britain, 1997.
CR  - Bölen, F., Erkut, G., Giritlioğlu, C. Ünal, Y. Zeren Gülersoy N., "Prospects for Planning Education: The Case of Istanbul Technical University", International Workshop on Planning Education, Rethinking Planning Education, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, İstanbul, 8-10 May 2002.
CR  - Carter, E.J., “Toward a core body of knowledge: A new curriculum for city and regional planners“, Journal of Planning Education and Research 12 (2), 1993, 160-63.
CR  - Castells, M., The City and the Grassroots, Arnold, Londra, 1977
CR  - Davidoff, P., “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning”, Journal of American Insitute of Planners, c. 31, sayı: 4, 1965, 544-45.
CR  - Dix, G., "Planning Education for Developing Countries: A Review and Some Proposal for a Policy", Ekistics, sayı :285, 1980, 400-401.
CR  - Fainstein, S. ve N. Fainstein, “New Debates in Urban Planning: the Impact of Marxist Theory within the United States”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, c. 3, 1979.
CR  - Friedman, J., Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action, Princeton, USA, 1987.
CR  - Gospodini, A., Skayannis, P., “Towards an ‘Integration Model’ of Planning Education Programmes in a European and International Context: The Contribution of Recent Greek Experience”, Planning Theory & Practice, sayı: 6, 2005, 355-382.
CR  - Gülersoy, N. Z. vd., Türkiye’de Şehir ve Bölge Planlama Eğitiminde Kalite Geliştirme ve Akreditasyon, Türkiye Planlama Okulları Birliği III. Dönem Çalışmaları, İTÜ, Şehir ve Bölge Planlaması Bölümü, İstanbul, 2007.
CR  - Hall, P., Cities of tomorrow, Oxford: Blackwell (Updated edition. First published 1988), 1996; Howard, E., Garden Cities of Tomorrow, Attic Books (First published in 1898 as ‘Tomorrow: Aktaran: Steno, N. (2000), Normativity In Urban Planning), 1985. www.a-aarhus.dk/welfarecity.
CR  - Harvey, D., Social Justice and the City, Arnold, Londra 1973.
CR  - Harvey, D., “On Planning the Ideology of Planning”, D. Harvey, The Urbanisation of Capital , John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1985.
CR  - Konuk, G., "Kentsel Rönesans Uyanış Kentsel Gelişmeyi Yönlendirmede / Planlama İlişkisi İçinde / Kentsel Tasarım Bakış Açısından / Kentsel Regenasyonun Yeri", Kentsel Yenileşme ve Kentsel Tasarım, 14th International Urban Design and Practices Symposium, MSGSÜ, İstanbul, 2003.
CR  - Mumford, L., The City in History: Its Origins, Its Transformations and Its Prospects, Secker & Warburg, London 1961.
CR  - Pickvance, C., “Physical Planning and Market Forces in Urban Development”, National Westminister Bank Quarterly, Ağustos 1977.
CR  - Pretteceille, E., “Urban Planning: the Contradictions of Capitalist Urbanisation”, Antipode, 8, 1, (C. Paris (ed.): Critical Readings in Planing Theory, 1974.
CR  - Şengül, H. T., “Planlama Paradigmalarının Dönüşümü Üzerine Eleştirel Bir Değerlendirme”, Kentsel Planlama Kuramları, Derleyen: Melih Ersoy, İmge Kitapevi, 2002.
CR  - Tekeli, İ. Mekansal ve Toplumsal Olanın Bilgibilimi Yazıları, Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları, İstanbul 2010.
CR  - Thornley, A., Urban Planning under Thatcherism, Routledge, Londra 1991.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/erusosbilder/issue//253399
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/219653
ER  -