TY  - JOUR
TT  - Evaluation of a Scientific Activity about Use of Web 2.0 Technologies in Education: The Participants` Views
AU  - Yükseltürk, Erman
AU  - Altıok, Serhat
AU  - Üçgül, Memet
PY  - 2017
DA  - April
JF  - Öğretim Teknolojileri ve Öğretmen Eğitimi Dergisi
PB  - Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2149-4495
SP  - 1
EP  - 8
VL  - 6
IS  - 1
KW  - Web 2.0 Eğitimi
KW  - Web 2.0 Araçları
KW  - Öğretmen Adayları
N2  - Web 2.0 technologies that socially based technologies are becoming morepopular in the everyday lives of students and teachers and capable ofsupporting informal conversation, reflexive dialogue and collaborative contentgeneration, enabling access to a wide raft of ideas and representations. As aresult, educators have begun to explore their use in formal education. However,teachers and pre-service teachers don’t have information about web 2.0technologies adequately. Therefore, researchers clustered Web 2.0 tools in regard to eight areas:social media, interactive presentation tools, online storage and file sharingtools, web authoring and collaborative tools, animation and video tools,learning management systems, online survey and testing tools, concept maps anddrawing tools. Because of these social tools could be used for education forfacilitate to teaching activities, authors have organized a scientific meetingabout web 2.0 education for pre-service teachers and shared their experienceabout this meeting process. This is a kind of seminar for pre-service teachersabout investigation and utilization of web 2.0 tools teaching and learningenvironments which is supported by TUBITAK. In this study, the participants’ views of this seminar were analyzedbased on three sub-titles: educational plan in the seminar, academicians in theseminar and benefits at the end of the seminar. It is a kind of descriptivestudy to analyze the participants’ views about this seminar. The sample of thestudy consisted of 40 pre-service teachers who participated in the seminar.They were selected from 10 different departments of 17 different universities andfrom 3rd and 4th year undergraduate students. 9 of them are male, 31 of them are female and 13 ofthe participants are in the third grade and 27 of them are studying in the fourthgrade. In order to collect relevant data, Activity Evaluation Survey (AES) wasused. It consists of 21 questions of type 5 Likert. In addition, we also askedthree open-ended questions to learn in depth what they would prefer for theprogram's positive and negative aspects and similar activities. According to the results, the views of pre-service teachers on the seminarwere gathered under three main themes: the planning of the seminar and thetraining program, academicians lecturing throughout the seminar, and benefitsat the end of the seminar. When the collected data were examined, it was seenthat the views of the participants were very positive in all of the materialsconstituting the themes. Proposals for the researchers who want to organizesimilar seminars on the problems and observations observed by the researchersduring the seminar are as follows:·Plan theactivities to take at least three days of each activity (e.g. Interactive PresentationTools (Prezi, SlideShare, PowToon)). This will lead to the prolongation of theduration of the seminar, which will increase the theoretical and practicalconsideration of a chosen topic.·If the participantsare working in different disciplines, such as teachers or pre-service teachers,the participants will be selected from a few areas and the training of examplepractices directly in these areas will make the training more effective.·Additionalactivities should be included in group work in an area-specific training thatcan be done over a longer period of time.
CR  - Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(2), 71-80.
CR  - Altun, A. (2008). Yapılandırmacı öğretim sürecinde viki kullanımı. In International Educational Technology Conference (IETC), Eskişehir, Türkiye.
CR  - Elmas, R., & Geban, Ö. (2012). Web 2.0 tools for 21st century teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(1), 243-254.
CR  - Fraenkel J.R. & Wallen N.E. (2006) How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill, New York.
CR  - Gökdere, M. ve Çepni, S. (2005). Üstün yeteneklilerin fen bilimleri öğretmenlerine yönelik bir hizmet içi eğitim uygulama ve değerlendirme çalışması. Gazi Üniversitesi Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3 (3), 271-296.
CR  - Günüç, S., Odabaşı, H.F. ve Kuzu, A. (2013). 21. yüzyıl öğrenci özelliklerinin öğretmen adayları tarafından tanımlanması: Bir Twitter uygulaması, Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(4), 436-455.
CR  - İlhan, A. Ç. (2004). 21. yüzyılda öğretmen yeterlikleri. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim Dergisi, 58.
CR  - İşman, A.  Ve Albayrak, E. (2014). Sosyal Ağlardan Facebook’un Eğitime Yönelik Etkililiği. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 129-138.
CR  - O'Reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies, (1), 17. ISO 690
CR  - Özmen, F., Aküzüm, C., Sünkür, M. ve Baysal, N. (2011). Sosyal ağ sitelerinin eğitsel ortamlardaki         işlevselliği. 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium (IATS’11), Elazığ, Turkey
CR  - Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
CR  - Uzal, G., Erdem, A., Önen, F. ve Gürdal, A. (2010). Basit Araç Gereçlerle Yapılan Fen Deneyleri Konusunda Öğretmen Görüşleri ve Gerçekleştirilen Hizmet İçi Eğitimin Değerlendirilmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(4), 64-84.
CR  - Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (5. Baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jitte/article/295287
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/299152
ER  -