TY  - JOUR
T1  - Investigation of Fume Formation Rate in SMAW of 316L Stainless Steel with Different Electrodes Using Taguchi and Anova
TT  - Investigation of Fume Formation Rate in SMAW of 316L Stainless Steel with Different Electrodes Using Taguchi and Anova
AU  - Mert, Tolga
AU  - Şenöz, Kutsi Mert
AU  - Bilgili, Levent
AU  - Çelebi, Uğur Buğra
AU  - Ekinci, Serkan
PY  - 2017
DA  - May
DO  - 10.31202/ecjse.318227
JF  - El-Cezeri
JO  - El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering
PB  - Tayfun UYGUNOĞLU
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2148-3736
SP  - 291
EP  - 296
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
LA  - en
AB  - Welding is one of themost utilized joining techniques in heavy industry and manufacturing sector dueto its ease of application and strength. 316L grade stainless steel is mainlyused in chemical, petro-chemical, food, paper, paint and shipbuildingindustries as well as dairy equipment. Arc welding processes are preferred injoining of stainless steel and shielded metal arc welding is widely used inthis respect along with gas metal arc welding. There are some drawbacks ofwelding despite many advantages. Welding is defined as a hazardous process interms of occupational safety and health and the environment because of toxicfume and noxious gases emitted. In this study, Taguchi design of experiment wasutilized and shielded metal arc welding of 316L grade stainless steel wasrealized using electrodes with same classification from two different brandswith different current parameters. Fume formation rates for each experimentalcondition were measured and results were evaluated using Taguchi signal tonoise ratios and analysis of variance.
KW  - 316L stainless steel
KW  - SMAW
KW  - fume formation rate
KW  - Taguchi
N2  - Kaynak, kolayuygulanabilirliğinden ve mukavemetinden dolayı, imalat sektörü ve ağır sanayideen çok kullanılan birleştirme yöntemlerinden birisidir. 316L kalite paslanmazçeliklerin başlıca kullanım alanları kimya, petro-kimya, gıda, kağıt, boya vegemi imalatıdır. Paslanmaz çeliklerin kaynağında ark kaynak prosesleri tercihedilmektedir ve gazaltı kaynağının yanında örtülü elektrotla ark kaynağı dasıklıkla kullanılmaktadır. Kaynak prosesinin avantajlarının yanında bazıdezavantajları da vardır. Kaynak, toksik duman ve sağlığa zararlı gazlaroluşturduğu için iş sağlığı ve güvenliği ile çevre açısından tehlikeli birproses olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, Taguchi deneysel tasarımıoluşturulmuş ve iki farklı markanın aynı sınıflandırmaya sahip elektrotları, farklıakım parametreleri kullanılarak 316L paslanmaz çeliğin örtülü elektrot arkkaynağında kullanılmıştır. Her deney şartındaki duman oluşum hızları ölçülmüşve sonuçlar Taguchi sinyal-gürültü oranı ve varyans analizi iledeğerlendirilmiştir
CR  - [1] Celebi, U.B., “Investigation on welding emission estimation in shipyards for different ship types”, Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 23(8a) (2014), 1904-1914.
[2] Harris, I., Castner H., “Mechanization and Automation of Welding and Cutting Processes to Reduce Fume Exposure”, NSRP ASE Project, (2003). 
[3] Senoz, K.M., Bilgili, L., Mert, T., Celebi, U.B., Ekinci, S., Vardar, N., “Fume Formation Rate of Shielded Metal Arc Welding of Stainless Steel Used in Chemical Tankers in Shipbuilding”, The 8th International Scientific Conference on Naval, Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (TEHNONAV’15), 2-4 July 2015, Constanta, Romania, Special Issue, ss. 27-32.
[4] Mener, W.C., Rosen, P.L., Austin, D.N., Holt, W.S., “Shipyard Welding Emission Factor Development”, 10th International Emission Inventory Conference - One Atmosphere, One Inventory, Many Challenges, 1 – 3 May 2001, Denver, U.S.A.
[5] Sowards, J.W., Lippold, J.C., Dickinson, D.W., Ramirez, A.J., “Characterization of Welding Fume from SMAW Electrodes — Part I”, Welding Journal, 87 (2008), 106-s-112-s.
[6] Kura, B., “Evaluation of Cr (VI) Exposure Levels in the Shipbuilding Industry”, GCRMTC, Final Report, (1998).
[7] Konarski, P., Iwanejko, I., Ćwil, M., “Core-shell morphology of welding fume micro and nanoparticles”, Vacuum, 70 (2003), 385-389.
[8] Sowards, J.W., Ramirez, A.J., Dickinson, D.W., Lippold, J.C., “Characterization of welding fume from SMAW electrodes-Part II”, Welding Journal, 89 (2010), 82s-90s.
[9] Matczak, W., Chmielnicka, J., “Methods for determining soluble and insoluble Cr III and Cr VI compounds in welding fumes”, Polish Journal of Occupational Medicine, 2(4) (1989), 376-388.
[10] Stopford, W., “Welding and Exposures to Manganese Assessment of Neurological Adverse Effects”, Duke University Medical Center Department of Community & Family Medicine Division of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, Durham NC, (2005).
[11] NIOSH, “Welding: Fumes and gases”, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra WAP 90/034GS, 1990.
[12] NIOSH, “Nomination of Welding Fumes for Toxicity Studies”, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 2002.
[13] Mert, T., Bilgili, L., Senoz, K.M., Celebi, U.B., Ekinci, S., “The Effect of Parameter Selection on Fume Formation Rate in SMAW of AH-36 Shipbuilding Steel and Analysis with Anova Method”, Global Conference on Global Warming (GCGW’15), 24 – 27 May 2015, Athens, Greece.
[14] EN ISO 15011-1, “Health and safety in welding and allied processes — Laboratory method for sampling fume and gases Part 1: Determination of fume emission rate during arc welding and collection of fume for analysis”, 2009.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.31202/ecjse.318227
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/309778
ER  -