@article{article_326621, title={Comparison of Financial Performance of Participation Banks and Private Capital Conventionel Banks in Turkey}, journal={Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Social Sciences}, volume={4}, pages={89–117}, year={2017}, DOI={10.17336/igusbd.326621}, url={https://izlik.org/JA68ES37RL}, author={Yurttadur, Mustafa and Demirbaş, Hayati}, keywords={Katılım Bankacılığı,Katılım Bankaları,Mevduat Bankaları,Finansal Performans,Bankacılıkta Finansal Performans}, abstract={<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top:6pt;margin-right:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;margin-left:0cm;text-align:justify;text-indent:1cm;"> <span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:115%;font-family:Cambria, serif;">Participation banks are different from conventionel banks in that their
working principles are complementary to the financial system and operate in the
same competitive environment as conventionel banks. From this point of view,
the finacial performance of the participation banks will be more or less
different depending on the conventionel banks, and they will provide clues
about the future growth performance of these banks. In this study, financial
performance of 3 participation banks including Turkiye Finans, Albaraka Turk
and Kuveyt Turk and three conventionel banks of similar size (Şeker Bank, Turk
Ekonomi Bankasi and ING Bank) were compared using 2010-2016 financial data. In
comparison, a total of 11 ratios were used in profitability, liquidity, risk
and solvency, asset quality and capital adequacy.  </span> </p> <p> </p>}, number={2}