TY - JOUR TT - TOPSIS ve GİA Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Lastik Seçimi AU - Gök, MURAT AU - Yiğit, ALPEREN MUSTAFA PY - 2017 DA - November JF - Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi JO - ODÜSOBİAD PB - Ordu Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 1309-9302 SP - 423 EP - 431 VL - 7 IS - 3 KW - GRA KW - Multi-Criteria Decision Making KW - Tire Selection KW - TOPSIS N2 - Güvenlisürüş için, araçlarda kullanılan lastikler etkin bir şekildedeğerlendirilmelidir. Kullanıcılar genel olarak satın alım süreçlerinde fiyatgibi tek bir kritere bağlı kalmayıp, birden çok kriteri gözönüne almaktadır. Bubakımdan lastik seçimi de, müşterilerin yola tutunma, dayanıklılık, gürültü,yakıt tüketimi gibi bir çok kriteri göz önüne almaları gereken karmaşık birsüreçtir. Bu nedenden dolayı, lastiklerin seçimi bir Çok Kriterli Karar Verme(MCDM) problemi olarak modellenebilir. Birden çok kriter ve alternatifbarındıran bu tür problemler, Çok Kriterli Karar Verme yöntemleri ilekolaylıkla çözümlenmektedir. Bu amaçla lastik seçiminde öne çıkan temelkriterler ıslak/kuru zemin performansı, gürültü, aşınma ve yakıt tüketimiolarak belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, ADAC'ın (Avrupa'nın en büyük otomobilkulübü) test verileri Çok Kriterli Karar problemini çözmek noktasında girdiolarak kullanılmıştır. ADAC’ın oluşturduğu temel ölçek yardmıyla alternatiflerderecelendirilmiştir. GİA (Gri İlişkisel Analiz) ve TOPSIS (Technique for OrderPreference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) yöntemleri sınıflandırma/derecelendirmeproblemlerinde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bundan dolayı, 5 kriter ve 16alternatif barındıran karar problemi GİA ve TOPSIS yöntemleri ile çözümlenmiştir.Analiz sonucunda ortaya çıkan bulgular, ADAC test sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılmışve tüm sıralama sonuçları yorumlanmıştır. CR - ADAC Automotive Engineering Report. (03/2016). CR - Behzadian, M., Otaghsara, S. K., Yazdani. M. & Ignatius, J. (2012). A State-Of The-Art Survey Of TOPSIS Applications. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol 39, Pp. 13051-13069. CR - Chan, J. W. K. & Tong, T. K. L., (2007). Multi- Criteria Material Selection and End-Of-Life Product Strategy: Grey Relational Analysis Approach. Materials And Design, Vol 28, Pp. 1539-1546. CR - Chang, C. H., Lin, J. J., Lin, J. H., & Chiang, M. C. (2010). Domestic Open-End Equity Mutual Fund Performance Evaluation Using Extended TOPSIS Method With Different Distance Approaches. Expert Systems With Applications, Vol 37, Pp. 4642–4649. CR - Chang, S. H., Hwang, J. R. & Doong, J. L. (2000). Optimization Of The Injection Molding Process Of Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Polycarbonate Composites Using Grey Relational Analysis. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol 97, Pp. 186-193. CR - Chang, T. C. & Lin, S. J. (1996). Grey Relation Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions From Industrial Production and Energy Uses In Taiwan. Journal Of Environmental Management, Vol 56, Pp. 247-257. CR - Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of The TOPSIS For Group Decision-Making Under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets And Systems, Vol 114, Pp. 1–9. CR - Chen, M. F., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Combining Grey Relation And TOPSIS Concepts For Selecting An Expatriate Host Country. Mathematical And Computer Modeling, Vol 40, Pp. 1473–1490. CR - Dagdeviren, M. (2010). A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model For Personnel Selection In Manufacturing Systems. Journal Of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol 21, Pp. 451–460. CR - Dai, J., Qi, J., Chi, J., Chen, S., Yang, J., Ju, L., Et Al. (2010). Integrated Water Resource Security Evaluation Of Beijing Based On GRA And TOPSIS. Frontiers Of Earth Science In China, Vol 4(3), Pp. 357–362. CR - Deng, H., Yeh, C. H. & Willis R. J. (2000). Inter- Company Comparison Using Modified TOPSIS With Objective Weights. Computers & Operations Research, Vol 27, Pp. 963-973. CR - Fan, Z. P., & Feng, B. (2009). A Multiple Attributes Decision Making Method Using Individual And Collaborative Attribute Data In A Fuzzy Environment. Information Sciences, Vol 179, Pp. 3603–3618. CR - Feng, C. M., & Wang, R. T. (2000). Performance Evaluation For Airlines Including The Consideration Of Financial Ratios. Journal Of Air Transport Management, Vol 6, Pp. 133–142. CR - Freedonia. (2015). World Tires. Industry Study No: 3357. CR - Fu, C., Zheng, J., Zhao, J. & Xu, W. (2001). Application Of Grey Relational Analysis For Corrosion Failure Of Oil Tubes. Corrosion Sciences, Vol 43, Pp. 881- 889. CR - Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. P. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods And Applications, New York: Springer- Verlag. CR - Hwang, L. C., Lai, Y. J. & Liu. T. Y. (1993). A New Approach For Multiple Objective Decision Making. Computers & Operations Research, Vol 20, Pp. 889-899. CR - Jahanshahloo, G. R., Lotfi, F. H., & Izadikhah, M. (2006). An Algorithmic Method To Extend TOPSIS For Decision-Making Problems With Interval Data. Applied Mathematics And Computation, Vol 175, Pp. 1375–1384. CR - Kuo, Y., Yang, T. & Huang, G. W. (2008). The Use Of Grey Relational Analysis In Solving Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Problems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol 55, Pp. 80-93. CR - Lai, Y. J., Liu, T. Y. & Hwang, L. C. (1994). TOPSIS For MCDM. European Journal Of Operational Research, Vol 76, Pp. 486-500. CR - Li, X., Wang, K., Lıu, L., Xın, J., Yang, H. & Gao, C. (2011). Application Of The Entropy Weight and TOPSIS Method In Safety Evaluation Of Coal Mines. Procedia Engineering, Vol 26, Pp. 2085-2091. CR - Liang, R. H. (1999). Application Of Grey Relation Analysis To Hydroelectric Generation Scheduling. Electrical Power And Energy Systems, Vol 21, Pp. 357-364. CR - Opricovic, S & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise Solution By Mcdm Methods: A Comparative Analysis Of Vikor And TOPSIS. European Journal Of Operational Research, Vol 156, Pp. 445- 455. CR - Ozcan, T., Celebi, N., & Esnaf, S. (2011). Comparative Analysis Of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodologies And Implementation Of A Warehouse Location Selection Problem. Expert Systems With Applications, Vol 38, Pp. 9773–9779. CR - Sun, C. C. (2010). A Performance Evaluation Model by Integrating Fuzzy AHP And Fuzzy TOPSIS Methods. Expert Systems With Applications, Vol 37, Pp. 7745–7754. CR - Triantaphyllou, E. & Lin, C. T. (1996). Development And Evaluation Of Five Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision –Making Methods. International Journal Of Approximate Reasoning, Vol 14, Pp. 281-310. CR - Tsaur, S. H., Chang, T. Y., & Yen, C. H. (2002). The Evaluation Of Airline Service Quality By Fuzzy MCDM. Tourism Management, Vol 23, Pp. 107–115. CR - Wu, H. H. (2002). A Comparative Study Of Using Grey Relational Analysis In Multiple Attribute Decision Making Problems. Quality Engineering, Vol 15, Pp. 209-217. CR - Yan, G., Ling, Z., & Dequn, Z. (2011). Performance Evaluation Of Coal Enterprises Energy Conservation and Reduction Of Pollutant Emissions Base On GTA–TOPSIS. Energy Procedia, Vol 5, Pp. 535–539. CR - Yousefi, A. & Vencheh, A. H. (2010). An Integrated Group Decision Making Model and Its Evaluation By DEA For Automobile Industry. Expert Systems With Applications, Vol 37, Pp. 8543-8556. UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/odusobiad/issue//341493 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/371906 ER -