TY - JOUR T1 - Long term results of double plate appliance and facemask combination in the treatment of Class III malocclusion: cephalometric analysis TT - Sınıf III maloklüzyonun tedavisinde ağız-içi çift plak ile yüz maskesi kombine uygulamasının uzun dönem sonuçları: sefalometrik analiz AU - Kaygısız, Emine AU - Bozkaya, Erdal AU - Tortop, Tuba AU - Ercan, Dervis Emre AU - Yuksel, Sema PY - 2018 DA - August DO - 10.17214/gaziaot.345052 JF - Acta Odontologica Turcica JO - Acta Odontol Turc PB - Gazi Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 2147-690X SP - 62 EP - 68 VL - 35 IS - 3 LA - en AB - Objective: The aim of thisstudy was to evaluate the long term results of double plate appliance andfacemask combination (DPA-FM) in treating Class III malocclusions when growthpotential of the patients was close to cease or ceased.Materials and Method: The material consistedof the pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2), and long term (T3) lateralcephalometric and the hand-wrist radiographs of 13 patients (5 females, 8 males;mean chronological age: 11.1±1.40 years) with skeletal and dental Class IIImalocclusion treated with DPA-FM combination. The mean DPA-FM treatment timewas 10.8±1.88 months. The hand-wrist growth and developmental stages were MP3uor Ru at T3. The mean follow-up period was 5.0±1.98 years. Friedman’s Two-WayANOVA and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to evaluate the treatment(T2-T1), follow-up (T3-T2) and overall (T3-T1) results.Results: Withthe DPA-FM therapy, SNA and ANB angles increased (p<0.001); however, nosignificant differences were found in these parameters during T3-T2 period[p=0.655 (SNA), p=0.805 (ANB)]. Significant increases were found in N┴FH-A distance duringthe treatment (p<0.01) and follow-up (p<0.05) periods. Molar relation showedsignificant increases with DPA-FM in both the treatment and overall period(p<0.001). Overjet increased significantly during the treatment(p<0.001), follow-up (p<0.05), and overall (p<0.001) periods.Significant protrusion of upper incisors (U1/NA) was observed during thetreatment, follow-up, and overall periods (p<0.05). U6/PP and L6/MP anglesdid not change during the DPA-FM treatment; however, these parameters decreasedsignificantly during the follow-up and overall periods (p<0.05).Conclusion: In the treatment ofClass III malocclusion, the DPA-FM appliance was effective. The skeletal anddental sagittal changes achieved by orthopedic treatment were maintained in thelong term. KW - Angle Class III KW - extraoral traction appliances KW - follow-up studies KW - malocclusion KW - orthodontic appliances KW - orthodontics N2 - Amaç: Sınıf III maloklüzyonun tedavisinde kullanılan ağız-içi çift plakile yüz maskesi (AÇP-YM) kombine tedavisinin uzun dönem sonuçlarının büyümepotansiyeli bitmiş ya da bitmekte olan hastalarda değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmanın materyali AÇP-YM kombine tedavisi uygulanmış olaniskeletsel ve dişsel Sınıf III maloklüzyona sahip 13 hastaya (5 kız, 8 erkek;ortalama kronolojik yaş: 11.1±1.40 yıl) ait tedavi öncesi (T1), sonrası (T2) veuzun dönem takip (T3) lateral sefalometrik ve el bilek radyografilerindenoluşturuldu. Ortalama AÇP-YM tedavi süresi 10.8±1.88 aydır. T3 döneminde, elbilek büyüme ve gelişim safhası, MP3u veya Ru dönemidir. Ortalama takip süresi5.0±1.98 yıldır. Tedavi (T2-T1), takip (T3-T2) ve toplam (T3-T1) değişikliklerideğerlendirmek için Friedman iki yönlü ANOVA ve Wilcoxon işaretli sıralartestleri kullanıldı.Bulgular: AÇP-YM tedavisi ile SNA ve ANB açılarında artış bulundu (p<0.001). Ancak buparametrelerde T3-T2 döneminde önemli düzeyde bir değişiklik meydana gelmedi [p=0.655 (SNA), p=0.805(ANB)]. N┴FH-A mesafesi tedavi(p<0.01) ve takip (p<0.05) dönemlerinde önemli düzeyde arttı. Molar ilişkide, hem AÇP-YM tedavisi sırasında hem de toplam süredeönemli düzeyde bir artış meydana geldi (p<0.001). Overjet ise, tedavi(p<0.001), takip (p<0.05) ve toplam sürede (p<0.001) önemli düzeydearttı. Tedavi, takip dönemlerinde ve toplam sürede, üst keserlerde (U1/NA)önemli düzeyde protrüzyon gözlendi (p<0.05). U6/PP ve L6/MP açıları AÇP-YMtedavisi ile değişmezken, takip periyodunda ve toplam sürede bu parametrelerdeönemli düzeyde azalma meydana geldi (p<0.05).Sonuç: AÇP-YM kombine tedavisi, Sınıf III maloklüzyonun tedavisinde etkilibulundu. Bu ortopedik tedavi ile meydana gelen iskeletsel ve dişsel sagitaldeğişikliklerin uzun dönem takip periyodunda korunduğu gözlendi. CR - Tortop T, Keykubat A, Yuksel S. Facemask therapy with and without expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:467-74. CR - Gencer D, Kaygisiz E, Yüksel S, Tortop T. Comparison of double-plate appliance/facemask combination and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2015;85:278-83. CR - Williams MD, Sarver DM, Sadowsky PL, Bradley E. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Semin Orthod 1997;3:265-74. CR - Ngan PW, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Treatment response and long-term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction. Semin Orthod 1997;3:255-64. CR - Hägg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie ABM. Long‐term follow‐up of early treatment with reverse headgear. Eur J Orthod 2003;25:95-102. CR - Westwood PV, McNamara Jr JA, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver DM. Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2003;123:306-20. CR - Tortop T, Kaygisiz E, Gencer D, Yuksel S, Atalay Z. Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2014;84:642-8. CR - Atalay Z, Tortop T. Dentofacial effects of a modified tandem traction bow appliance. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:655-61. CR - Gencer D, Hasanoğlu Nalcı N, Yuksel S, Tortop T. Effects of double plate - facemask appliance on dentofacial structures. GÜ Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009;26: 163-70. CR - Seehra J, Fleming PS, Dibiase AT. Reverse Twin Block appliance for early dental Class III correction. J Clin Orthod 2010;44:602-10. CR - Fränkel R. Maxillary retrusion in Class 3 and treatment with the function corrector 3. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 1970:249-59. CR - Arman A, Toygar TU, Abuhijleh E. Evaluation of maxillary protraction and fixed appliance therapy in Class III patients. Eur J Orthod 2006;28:383-92. CR - Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:404-13. CR - Ghiz MA, Ngan P, Gunel E. Cephalometric variables to predict future success of early orthopedic Class III treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;127:301-6. CR - Deguchi T, Kanomi R, Ashizawa Y, Rosenstein SW. Very early face mask therapy in Class III children. Angle Orthod 1999;69:349-55. CR - Gallagher R, Miranda F, Buschang P. Maxillary protraction: treatment and posttreatment effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:612-9. CR - Chen L, Chen R, Yang Y, Ji G, Shen G. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability—a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:88-95. CR - Üçem TT, Üçüncü N, Yüksel S. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:672-9. CR - Grave KC, Brown T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Orthod 1976;69:611-9. CR - Janson G, Caldas W, Garib DG, Foncatti CF. Long-term stability of Class III malocclusion nonextraction treatment. J World Fed Orthod 2017;6:20-7. CR - Mandall N, Cousley R, DiBiase A, Dyer F, Littlewood S, Mattick R, et al. Early class III protraction facemask treatment reduces the need for orthognathic surgery: a multi-centre, two-arm parallel randomized, controlled trial. J Orthod 2016;43:164-75. CR - Kaygisiz E, Yuksel S. Evaluation of the long-term results of facemask. Acta Odontol Turc 2014;31:127-33. CR - Macdonald KE, Kapust AJ, Turley PK. Cephalometric changes after the correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion/facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:13-24. CR - Shanker S, Ngan P, Wade D, Wade D, Beck M, Yiu C, et al. Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;110:423-30. CR - Chong YH, Ive JC, Årtun J. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1996;66:351-62. CR - Merwin D, Ngan P, Hagg U, Yiu C, Wei SH. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:292-9. CR - Wells AP, Sarver DM, Proffit WR. Long-term efficacy of reverse pull headgear therapy. Angle Orthod 2006;76:915-22. CR - Celikoglu M, Yavuz I, Unal T, Oktay H, Erdem A. Comparison of the soft and hard tissue effects of two different protraction mechanisms in class III patients: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:2115-22. CR - Rongo R, D'Antò V, Bucci R, Polito I, Martina R, Michelotti A. Skeletal and dental effects of Class III orthopaedic treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:545-62. CR - Cozza P, Baccetti T, Mucedero M, Pavoni C, Franchi L. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:300-10. CR - Üçüncü N, Tortop T, Yüksel S. A comparison of chincap and maxillary protraction appliances in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:43-51. CR - Baik HS, Jee SH, Lee KJ, Oh TK. Treatment effects of Fränkel functional regulator III in children with Class III malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:294-301. CR - Masucci C, Franchi L, Defraia E, Mucedero M, Cozza P, Baccetti T. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:493-500. UR - https://doi.org/10.17214/gaziaot.345052 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/523703 ER -