TY - JOUR TT - SURVIVAL OF ASSISTANT PROFESSORS IN ACADEMIA: A CASE STUDY AU - Akbay, Tuncer PY - 2017 DA - December JF - Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi JO - MAKÜ EBED PB - Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 2146-6467 SP - 1 EP - 16 VL - 5 IS - 7 KW - Assistant professor KW - performance KW - human performance technology KW - HPT N2 - The aim of this study is to identify theperformance problems of assistant professors in Mehmet Akif Ersoy UniversityFaculty of Education along with causes and sub-causes of underperformance. Toachieve this goal, six assistant professors sampled conveniently among theassistant professors working there in 2015-2016 education year. Theparticipants were interviewed through semi-structured interview instrument. Theinterview questions were written in accordance with Wile's synthesized HPTmodel. Then, interview questions were revised based upon content specialists'feedbacks and focus group discussion output. Then, the content analysis wereconducted and findings were reported. In accordance with the findings, the causes and sub-causes of performance CR - Craswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Dessinger, J. C., Moseley, J. L., & Tiem, D. M. V. (2012). Performance Improvement / HPT Model: Guiding the Progress. Performance Improvement, 51, 10-17. Gordin, Patricia C., "An instrumental case study of the phenomenon of collaboration in the process of improving community college developmental reading and writing instruction" (2006). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/2536 Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research: Perspective in Practice. London: Sage. Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Jurnal Kemanusiaan bil. Retrieved from: http://psyking.net/htmlobj-3837/case_study_as_a_research_method.pdf Pershing, J., A. (2006). Handbook of Human Performance Technology. Pershing, J., A (Ed.) Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. Ferond, C. (2006). The origins and evaluation of human performance technology. Handbook of Human Performance Technology. Pershing, J., A (Ed.) Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA. International Society for Performance Improvement (1997). 1997-1998 Performance improvement resources and membership directory. Washington, DC Wilmoth, F. S. Prigmore, C., Bray, M. (2002). HPT Models: An overview of the major models in the field. Performance Improvement 41, 16-24 Chyung, S. Y. (2008). Foundations of Instructional and Performance Technology. Amherst, Maasachusetts Harless, J. (1973). An analysis of front-end analysis. Improving Human Performance: A research Quarterly, 4, 229-244. Price, J. Cotton, S. R. (2006). Teaching, Research, and Service: Expectations from Assistant Professors. American Sociologist, 37(1), 5-21. Wile, D. (2014). Why doers do-part 1: Internal elements of human performance. Performance Improvement, 53(2), 14-20. Wile, D. (2014). Why doers do-part 3: External-intangible elements of Human Performance. Performance Improvement, 53(4), 6-15. UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ebed/issue//364907 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/395873 ER -