TY  - JOUR
TT  - The Applications of No-tillage in Turkey
AU  - Altıkat, Sefa
AU  - Kuş, Emrah
AU  - Küçükerdem, Hasan Kaan
AU  - Gözübüyük, Zinnur
PY  - 2017
DA  - December
JF  - Uluslararası Çevresel Eğilimler Dergisi
JO  - IJENT
PB  - Muhammed Kamil ÖDEN
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2602-4160
SP  - 54
EP  - 63
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
KW  - Benefits
KW  - Conventional tillage
KW  - No-tillage
N2  - No-tillage iseconomically viable, erosion limiting crop production system in which the cropplanted directly into the previous crop’s stubble with minimum soildisturbance.When compared to conventional tillage, the no-tillagesystem provides nitrogen accumulation in the soil and also improves soilaggregation and moisture holding capacity. In addition, the no-tillage increases N and C concentrations, microbialcarbon mass, and bacterial and fungal populations. It also reduces CO2and NO2 emissions and fuel consumption, and increases crop yieldover long periods. There are several factors that are effective in the successof this system. These factors include the type of no-till seeder, stubblecondition, sowing depth and time, crop rotation and the selection of thevarieties. When studies on this subject are examined, it can be said that thereis a need for more specific researches in order to spread the no-tillagerapidly throughout the country. For the foreseeable future, facilitatingnational development strategies for up-scaling of no tillage, conducting trainingcourse with national organizations remain a high priority to promote no tillagesystems. Our purpose in this research is to examine the scientificpublications and projects about no-tillage in Turkey and to discuss thedifficulties in the implementation phase of the method. It is also one of thegoals of trying to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of Turkey forno-tillage and conventional tillage.
CR  - [1] D.Karayel. 2009. Performance of a modified precision vacuum seeder for no-till sowing of maize and soybean. Soil & Tillage Research .104(1) 121-125.
[2] Z. Barut, C.Ertekin and H.Karaağaç, 2011. Tillage effects on energy use for corn silage in Mediterranean Coastal of Turkey. Energy 36 5466-5475.
[3] S. Gürsoy, A. Sessiz and S.S. Malhi, 2010. Short-term effects of tillage and residue management following cotton on grain yield and quality of wheat. Field Crops Research 119 :260–268. 
[4] A. Sessiz, A. Alp and S. Gürsoy, 2010. Conservation and conventional tillage methods on selected soil physical properties and corn (zea mays l.) Yield and quality under cropping system in turkey. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 16: 597-608. 
[5] H. Yalçın, E. Çakır and E. Aykas 2005. Tillage parameters and economic analysis of direct seeding, minimum and conventional tillage in wheat. Journal of Agronomy 4(4):329-332.
[6] H. ÖZtürk, K. Ekinci and Z. Barut 2017.  Energy analysis of the tillage systems in second crop corn production. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 28:3,25-37.
[7] K. Doğan, I. Çelik, M. Gök and A. Çoskan 2011. Effect of different soil tillage methods on rhizobial nodulation, biyomas and nitrogen content of second crop soybean. African Journal of Microbiology Research 5(20):3186-3194.
[8] I. Çelik, Z. Barut, I. Ortaş, M. Gok, A. Demirtaş, Y. Tulun, and C. Akpınar. Impacts of different tillage practices on some soil microbiological properties and crop yield under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. International Journal of Plant Production 5(3):237-254.
[9] A. Sessiz, T. Soğut, A. Alp and R. Esgici, 2008. Tillage effects on sunflower (helianthus annuus, l.) Emergence, yield, quality, and fuel consumption in double cropping system. Journal of Central Europen Agriculture. 4:697-710.
[10] I. Gençsoylu and I. Yalçın, 2004. The effects of different tillage systems on cotton pests and predators in cotton fields. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 3(1):39-44.
[11] Z. Gözübüyük, Ü. Şahin, İ. Öztürk, A. Çelik and M.Adıgüzel, 2014. Tillage effects on certain physical and hydraulic properties of a loamy soil under a crop rotation in a semi-arid region with a cool climate. Catena. 118:195-205.
[12] S. Altıkat and A. Çelik, 2011. The effects of tillage and intra-row compaction on seedbed properties and red lentil emergence under dry land conditions. Soil & Tillage Research 114:1-8.
[13] A. Çelik and S. Altıkat 2010. Effects of various strip widths and tractor forward speeds in strip tillage on soil physical properties and yield of silage corn. Journal of Agricultural Science. 16:169-179.
[14] S. Altıkat, A. Çelik and S. Bilen, 2012. Effects of various tillage systems on soil CO2-C fluxes and bacteria and fungi populations in Zea mays. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7(19):2926-2934.
[15] S. Altıkat, A. Çelik and Z. Gözübüyük, 2013. Effects of various no-till seeders and stubble conditions on sowing performance and see emergence of common vetch. 126:72-77.
[16] S. Altıkat 2012. Effects of strip width and tractor forward speed on sowing uniformity of maize and sunflower. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 18:375-382.
[17] S. Altıkat and A. Çelik 2012. Effects of different no-till seeders and tractor forward speeds on the soil physical properties and seed emergence of summer vetch and winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 18:21-30.
[18] A. Çelik and S. Altıkat, 2012. Seeding performance of no-till seeders equipment with different furrow openers, covering components and forward speeds for winter wheat. 2012. Journal of Agricultural Science 18:226-238.
[19]. S. Altıkat, A. Çelik, 2012. The effects of different no-till seeder and tractor forward speeds on stubble distribution of summer vetch and winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Atatürk University 43(2): 149-156.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijent/issue//369026
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/391567
ER  -