TY  - JOUR
TT  - Design and Analysis of Hydraulic Truck Unloading Platforms
AU  - Uludamar, Erinç
AU  - Tüccar, Gökhan
PY  - 2017
DA  - December
DO  - 10.21605/cukurovaummfd.371022
JF  - Çukurova Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi
JO  - cukurovaummfd
PB  - Çukurova Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1019-1011
SP  - 55
EP  - 62
VL  - 32
IS  - 4
KW  - Hidrolik kamyon boşaltma platformu
KW  - Sonlu elemanlar analizi
KW  - Dizayn
N2  - One of the most efficient ways of unloading undumped trucks are using Hydraulic Truck UnloadingPlatforms (HTUP). HTUPs should be designed carefully by considering the reliability of the platform andits material cost. Therefore, in this study, three different HTUP designs were compared by considering itsstress distribution at different operational positions and their costs. CATIA V5 and ANSYS Workbenchsoftware programs were used in order to prepare three-dimensional models of the platforms and theirstructural analyses. Structural analysis indicated that maximum von-Mises stress distribution of platformsare between 93,41 MPa and 210,29 MPa. The materials of the frame were selected according to stressdistribution. Material costs of the frames were compared and the results were presented, as well. It wasalso found that von-Mises stresses on the frame of the platform are higher at horizontal position than the45oinclined position. 
CR  - 1. Wu, J., Gao, J., Luo, Z., Brown, T.,2016.
Robust Topology Optimization for Structures
Under İnterval Uncertainty. Advances in
Engineering Software, Vol. 99, 36–48.
CR  - 2. Silori, P., Shaikh, A., Nithin Kumar, K.C.,
Tandon, T., 2015. Finite Element Analysis of
Traction Gear Using ANSYS. Materials Today:
Proceedings, Vol. 2, 2236–2245.
CR  - 3. Helou, M., Vongbunyong, S., Kara, S., 2016.
Finite Element Analysis and Validation of
Cellular Structures. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 50,
94–99.
CR  - 4. Balomenos, G.P., Genikomsou, A.S., Polak,
M.A., Pandey, M.D., 2015 Efficient Method
for Probabilistic Finite Element Analysis with
Application to Reinforced Concrete Slabs.
Engineering Structures, Vol. 103, 85–101.
CR  - 5. Bošnjak, S.M., Gnjatović, N.B., Momčilović,
D.B., Milenović, I.L.J., Gašić, V.M., 2015.
Failure analysis of the mobile elevating work
platform. Case Studies in Engineering Failure
Analysis, Vol. 3, 80–87.
CR  - 6. Ren Y., Yu Y., Zhao B., Fan C., Li H., 2017.
Finite Element Analysis and Optimal Design
for the Frame of SX360 Dump Trucks.
Procedia Engineering, Vol. 174, 638 – 647.
CR  - 7. Covill, D., Blayden, A., Coren, D., Begg, S.,
2015. Parametric Finite Element Analysis of
Steel Bicycle Frames: The Influence of Tube
Selection on Frame Stiffness. Procedia
Engineering, Vol. 112, 34–39.
CR  - 8. Nor, M.A.M., Rashid, H., Mahyuddin, W.M.F.
W., Azlan, M.A.M., Mahmud, J., 2012. Stress
Analysis of a Low Loader Chassis. Procedia
Engineering, Vol. 41, 995–1001.
CR  - 9. Hadi, M.N.S., Yuan J.S., 2017. Experimental
Investigation of Composite Beams Reinforced
with GFRP I-beam and Steel Bars.
Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 144,
462-474.
CR  - 10.Rivera J.A., Aguilar E., Cardenas D., Elizalde
H., Probst O., 2016. Progressive Failure
Analysis for Thin-walled Composite Beams
Under Fatigue Loads. Composite Structures,
Vol. 154, 79–91.
CR  - 11. Li, Y., Shan, W., Shen, H., Zhang, Z. W., Liu,
J., 2015. Bending Resistance of I-section
Bamboo-steel Composite Beams Utilizing
Adhesive Bond
UR  - https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.371022
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/391429
ER  -