TY - JOUR T1 - GHG Emission from Trucks During Collection of Solid Wastes: Çorlu Case Study AU - Macin, Kadriye Elif AU - Demir, İbrahim PY - 2018 DA - December JF - Eurasian Journal of Environmental Research JO - EJERE PB - Serkan ŞAHİNKAYA WT - DergiPark SN - 2602-2990 SP - 21 EP - 30 VL - 2 IS - 2 LA - en AB - Kerbside collection is mostcommon method in Turkey for solid waste collection. Çorlu has increasingpopulation rate due to growing industrial activities and investments.Information used in the study such as; average waste collection amount in amonth, truck properties (volume, engine power) and travelled distance duringwaste collection were obtained from Çorlu Municipality. Total fuel consumptionof trucks during collection of 1-ton waste for 1-km is between 2.12-5.47 L diesel / tonin Çorlu. Greenhouse gas emissions for different scenarios were calculated inthis study. First, GHG emission estimation done for same volume trucks usingdifferent fuel types, second estimation done for trucks with the same engine powerusing different fuel types. GHG emissions for Çorlu were calculated usingemission coefficients for; diesel, gasoline, heavy oil, light oil, natural gasfuels from literature sources. Maximum emission is found as 35 kg CO2-eq/ton, in case of using heavy oil in the 3.5 m3 vehicle and minimumemission is occurred 5,08 kg CO2-eqwhile using natural gas in 13+1,5 m3 truck. Contrary toexpectations, kg CO2-eq / ton value (which is show the GHG emissionrate) is decrease while the engine power (horsepower) increases. It has beendetermined that there are significant differences in GHG emissions when thetruck and/or fuel type are changed, even without changing factors such asroute, waste collection frequency and number of stops (number of containers). KW - Emission KW - fuel type KW - greenhouse gas KW - waste collection CR - Bolla V., Pendolovska V. 2011. General and regional statistics Environment and energy, Eurostat report. CR - Belediye Kanunu, Kanun Numarası,2005.5393 Madde 15, g bendi. CR - Diesel.net- Engine & emission technology. 2017. EU: Heavy-Duty Truck and Bus Engines. CR - Dr.GerDevlin, 2010. Fuel consumption of timber haulage versus general haulage. COFORD Dept. Agriculture, Fisheries & Food Agriculture House, Kildare Street Dublin 2, Ireland. CR - Eisted R., A. W. Larsen, Thomas H. 2009. Christensen Collection, transfer and transport of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Management & Research. 27 738–745 CR - Fruergaard T., Astrup T., Ekvall T. 2009. Energy use and recovery in waste management and implications for accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions, 2009. Waste Management & Research 27: 724–737 CR - İETT İşletmeleri Genel Müdürlüğü, 2013. Sürdürülebilirlik Raporu. CR - Iriarteab A., Gabarrellac X., Rieradevallac J.,2009. LCA of selective waste collection systems in dense urban areas. Waste Management 29(2): 903-914. CR - Larsen AW, Vrgoc M, Christensen TH, Lieberknecht P. 2009. Diesel consumption in waste collection and transport and its environmental significance. Waste Management & Research 27(7):652-659. CR - López J.M., Gómez Á., Aparicio F.and Sánchez J. 2009. Comparison of GHG emissions from diesel, biodiesel and natural gas refuse trucks of the City of Madrid. Applied Energy. 86(5): 610-615. CR - Öztürk İ, 2010. Katı Atık Yönetimi ve AB Uyumlu Uygulamaları Teknik Kitaplar Serisi Istaç. CR - The International Energy Agency (IEA), 2016. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion- 2016 Highlights. CR - Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK) 2015. Seragazı Emisyon İstatistikleri, 1990-2015. CR - Usón A. , Ferreira G., Zambrana Vásquez D, Zabalza Bribián I, Llera Sastresa E. 2013. Environmental-benefit analysis of two urban waste collection systems. Sci Total Environ. 72 (7):463-464 UR - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ejere/issue//422216 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/534703 ER -