TY  - JOUR
T1  - YEREL YÖNETİMLERİN KÖKENİ BAĞLAMINDA İTALYAN ŞEHİR DEVLETLERİNDE YÖNETİM VE AKTÖRLER
TT  - THE ACTORS AND DYNAMICS OF ADMINISTRATION IN ITALIAN CITY STATES AS  ROOT OF MODERN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
AU  - Tuncer, Aziz
PY  - 2018
DA  - May
JF  - Journal of Political Administrative and Local Studies
JO  - JPAL
PB  - Sakarya Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2636-803X
SP  - 1
EP  - 18
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
LA  - tr
AB  - Roma İmparatorluğu’nun yıkılmasından sonra imparatorluk boşluğu olarakadlandırılan dönemde İtalyan şehirleri uzunca bir süre şehir ölçeklifaaliyetleri kendileri yürütmüşlerdir. İmparatorluk döneminde merkezi yönetim(imparator) tarafından yapılmakta olan bu faaliyetler genellikle yerel bağlamdakilise tarafından yerine getirilmiştir ki bu sürecin sonunda kilise yerelyönetim faaliyetlerinin asli aktörü haline gelmiştir. Ancak 900’lü yıllarınortalarından sonra kendilerini toparlayan şehirlerde imalat ekonomisi vezenaatçılar öncülüğünde yeni ekonomik dinamikler ön plana çıkmaya başlamıştır. Uzunbir süredir kendi ayakları üzerinde duran şehirlerde şehir aidiyeti ekseninde ortaya çıkan yönetim anlayışı şehirölçekli üretimin de etkisiyle oldukça güçlenmiştir. Gelinen noktada şehiryönetiminin birincil aktörü olma bağlamında kilise ile çatışma kaçınılmazolmuştur ve bu çatışmanın galibi yeni ekonomik ve sosyal dinamiklerintemsilcisi olan şehir konsülleri olmuştur. Ancak şehir konsüllerinin şehirlerinbirincil temsilcisi olma iddiası Regalyanhaklar bağlamında şehirler üzerinde idari ve vergi toplama hakları olanimparatorlar tarafından kabul edilmemiştir. Bu makale imparator ile şehirlerin Regalyan haklar-yerel çıkarlar bağlamındaortaya çıkan çatışmalarının sebepleri ve bu çatışmalar sonucunda şekillenenmerkez-yerel yönetim yetki paylaşım çerçevesini ve bu çerçevenin bölgeselmerkezileşme bağlamında dönüşümünü analiz ederek modern yerel yönetim-merkeziyönetim ilişki modellerinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır.
KW  - İtalyan Şehir Devletleri
KW  - Regalyan Haklar
KW  - Şehir Konsülleri
KW  - Merkezileşme
KW  - Merkezi-Yerel Yönetim İlkeleri
N2  - Following the collapse of the Roman Empire the Italian citiesexperienced the conditions under which they undertook some administrativeresponsibilities that generally were implemented by the emperor as a part of Regalian rights. In this periodadministrative power of the church increased considerably and it becameprominent actor of local administration.  On the other hand, in those cities a newmanufacture oriented traders and artisans emerged as a class claimed to be the primaryactor of local administrative affairs.  Thenovel economic conditions and rising administrative understanding, based upon thepriorities of the cities, facilitated the defeat of the church. Following theelimination of the church, city councils were accepted as institution whichprotected city dwellers’ benefit.  However,the claim of city councils to be the chief actor of local administration deeplycontradicted with the traditional Regalianrights of the kings.  In this article, thestruggle between emperor and city states, on the axis of Regalian rights and city-oriented interests, and the framework forpower sharing patterns are analyzed as an earlier form of central versus local relations.Such an approach could be meaningful to comprehend the origin and the developmentof the framework for modern central-local government relations’  patterns.
CR  - Anderson, Perry  (1974).  Lineages of the Absolutist State. NLB
Bloch, Marc (2005). Feudal Society, Volume II. Social Classes and Political Organization. Translated from French by L.A. Manyon. Taylor and Francis e-Library.
Blockmans, Wim (1989).Voracious States and Obstructing Cities. An aspect of  State Formation in Preindustrial Europe. Theory and Society 18:733-755
Blockmans, Wim (1988).  Alternatives to Monarchical Centralisation: The Great Tradition of Revolt in Flanders and Brabant
https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/2873/351_069.pdf?sequence=1
Chittolini Giorgio (1989). Cities,”City-states,” and Regional States in North-Central Italy. Theory and Society.18: 689-706
Dente, Bruno (1985). “Center-Local Relations in Italy: The Impact of The Legal and Political Structures”. İçinde Center- Periphery Relations in Western Europe. Edited Yves Meny and Vincent Wright .George Allen, Unwin , London.
Epstein, Steven (2000).  Freedom and Growth: The Rise of States and Markets in Europe, 1300-1750 . Routledge.
Fasano Guarini, Elena (1995). “Center and Periphery”.  Edited  Julius Kirshner. The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. İçinde Ss.74-96. The University of Chicago Press.
Jones, Philip (1997). The Italian City-State.From Commune to Signoria. Oxford University Press.
Kirshner, Julius (1996).The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. The University of Chicago Press.
Loughlin, John (2001), “Italy: The Crisis of the Second Republic”, Subnational Democracy in the European Union: Challenges and Opportunities . Ed:John Loughlin With the collaboration of Eliseo Aja, Udo Bullmann, Frank Hendriks, Anders Lidström, Daniel Seiler. Oxford University Press ss.211-229
Machiavelli, Niccolo (2008). The Prince. Translated by James Atkinson. Hackett Publishing. Indianapolis/Cambridge
Martines, Lauro (1988). Power and Imagination:City-States in Renaissance Italy. The Johns Hopkins University Press.  
Nicholas, David (1997).  The Growth of the Medieval City: From Late Antiquity to the Early Fourteenth Century. Addison Wesley Longman.
Nicholas, David (1997b). The Later Medieval City 1300–1500. Taylor &Francis
Parker, Geoffrey (2004). The Soverign City: The City-State Through History. Reaktion Books.
Pirenne, Henry (2010). Ortaçağ Kentleri: Kökenleri ve Ticaretin Canlanması. Çeviren Şadan Karadeniz. İletişim Yayınları.
Poggi, Gianfranco (2009). Çağdaş Devletin Gelişimi. Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
Reynolds, Susan (1997). Kingdoms and Communities in Western Europe, 900–1300. Second  Edition. Oxford. 
Rose, Richard (1985). “From Government at the Centre to Nationwide Government”,Center- Periphery Relations in Western Europe ,Yves Meny and Vincent Wright .George Allen, Unwin , London.
Schiera, Pierangelo (1995). “Legitimacy, Discipline and Institutions: Three Necessary Conditions for The Birth of The Modern State”. İçinde: Julius Kirshner The Origins of The State in Italy.1300-1600. Ss.11-33. The University of Chicago Press.
Scott, Tom (2012). The City State in Europe,1000-1600: Hinterland, Territory, Region. Oxford University Press.
Tabacco, Giovanni (2008). Northern and Central Italy in The Eleventh Century. The New Cambridge M edieval History, vol:4, pp: 72-93. Edited by David Luscombe & Jonathan Riley-Smith. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles (1989). Cities and States in Europe. Theory and Society 18:563-584.,Theor
Weber, Max (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Society. Editted by Gunther Roth and Claus Wittich. University of California Press. 
Waley, Daniel & Dean Trevor (2010). The Italian City-Republics. 4th edition. Routledge.
Wickham, Chris (1981). Early Medieval Italy: Central Power and Local Society 400-1000. The Macmillan Press.
Zariski, Raphael (1983). “The Establishment of the Kingdom of Italy as a Unitary State: A Case Study in Regime Formation” Publius, Vol. 13, No. 4 ss. 1-19.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jpaljournal/issue//424478
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/473723
ER  -