TY - JOUR T1 - Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Okuryazarlık Öz-yeterlilik Becerilerinin Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi TT - An Investigation of Digital Literacy Self-efficacy Skills of Pre-Service Teachers In Terms of Different Variables AU - Karakuş, Gülçin AU - Ocak, Gürbüz PY - 2019 DA - March DO - 10.32709/akusosbil.466549 JF - Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi JO - AKÜSBD PB - Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi WT - DergiPark SN - 1302-1265 SP - 129 EP - 147 VL - 21 IS - 1 LA - tr AB - Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının dijitalokur-yazarlık öz-yeterlilik becerilerini cinsiyet, öğrenim görmekte olduklarıbölüm, anne ve baba eğitim durumu, mezun oldukları okul türü, bilgisayar erişimolanakları açısından incelemektir. Çalışmada Ocak ve Karakuş (2018) tarafındangeliştirilen “Öğretmen AdaylarınınDijital Okuryazarlık Öz-yeterliliği Ölçeği (ÖADOÖÖ)” olarak adlandırılanCronbach-Alpha iç tutarlık sayısı 0. 961 olan likert tipi ölçek kullanılmıştır.Çalışmanın örneklemini Ege Bölgesinde bir üniversitede öğrenim gören 284öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılı güzdöneminde elde edilmiştir. Çalışma sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının dijitalokuryazarlık öz-yeterliklerinin yüksek olduğu, cinsiyetin bir alt boyuttaetkili olduğu, anne baba eğitim durumunun etkili olmadığı, bilgisayaröğretmenliği bölümünün dijital okuryazarlık öz-yeterlik düzeyinin yüksek olduğuve meslek liselerinden mezun olan öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlıköz-yeterlik düzeylerinin düşük olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. KW - Öğretmen adayları KW - dijital okuryazarlık KW - öz-yeterlik N2 - The aim of thisstudy is to examine the digital literacy self-efficacy skills of pre-serviceteachers in terms of gender, the department they study, the educational statusof their parents, the type of school they graduate, and having computer or not.In this study, Digital Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale of Pre-service Teachers(ÖADOÖÖ) was used. Scale was developed by the Ocak and Karakuş (2018). Thescale’s Cronbach-Alpha co-efficiency was 0.961. The sample of the study consists of 284 studentsstudying at a university in the Aegean Region. The data of the study were obtained in the fall semester of 2018-2019academic year. According to the results it is concluded that the pre-serviceteachers have high levels of digital literacy self-efficacy, gender iseffective in one sub-dimension, pre-service teachers’ parents’ education statusis not effective, the level of digital literacy self-efficacy of the computerteaching department is high and that the digital literacy self-efficacy levelsof vocational high schools are low. CR - Acar, Ç. (2015). Anne ve babaların ilkokul ortaokul ve lise öğrencisi çocukları ile kendilerinin dijital okuryazarlıklarına ilişkin görüşleri (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara. CR - Atif, Y., & Chou, C. (2018). Digital Citizenship: Innovations in Education, Practice, and Pedagogy. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 152-154. CR - Andrade, B. (2004). Analfabetismo tecnológico: efecto de las tecnologías de información. Actualidad contable FACES, 7(8). CR - Campbell, E. (2016). Pre-service teachers' perceptions and practices: integrating digital literacy into English education(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Cape Town. CR - Carrizo, M. (2012). Las redes sociales como factor determinante de transgresión en la comunicación entre adolescentes El fenómeno de Facebook y su influencia (Tesis Pregrado). Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación y de la Comunicación Social. Universidad del Salvador. Buenos Aires. Recuperado de http://www.usal.edu.ar/archivos/di/carrizo_ mercedes.pdf CR - Cohen, L. M., & Manion, L. & Morrison, K.(2007). Research methods in education, 6.Comber, C., Colley, A., Hargreaves, D. J., & Dorn, L. (1997). The effects of age, gender and computer experience upon computer attitudes. Educational Research, 39(2), 123-133 CR - Çetin, O., Çalışkan, E., & Menzi, N. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının teknoloji yeterlilikleri ile teknolojiye yönelik tutumları arasındaki ilişki. İlköğretim Online, 11(2). CR - Dincer, S. (2012). A study of the relationship between pupils and parents’ computer literacy level and use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 484-489. CR - Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. CR - Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union http://dx.doi.org/10.2791/82116 JRC IPTS. CR - Gasaymeh, A. M. M., Al-Tawel, A. M., Al-Moghrabi, K. G., & Al-Ghonmein, A. M. (2017). University students’ perceptions of the use of digital technologies in their formal learning: a developing country perspective. International Journal of Learning and Development, 7(3), 149-164. CR - Güneş, E., & Bahçivan, E. (2018). A mixed research-based model for pre-service science teachers' digital literacy: Responses to “which beliefs” and “how and why they interact” questions. Computers & Education, 118, 96-106. CR - International Society for Technology in Education. (2007). National educational technology standards for students. ISTE (Interntl Soc Tech Educ).Jackson, S.L. (2015). Research methods and statistics: A critical thinking approach. Cengage Learning.Karasu, M. ve Arıkan, D. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının sosyal medya kullanım durumları ve medya okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi.Ege Eğitim Dergisi ,17 (2), 549–566. CR - Khalid, S., Slættalíð, T. , Parveen, M. & Hossain, M.S. (2015). A systematic review and meta-analysis of teachers’ development of digital literacy. Kasım 2015 Innovations in Digital Learning for Inclusion 1st D4|Learning International Conference Paper. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2421.5120. CR - Korkmaz, Ö., Mahiroğlu, A. (2009). Üniversiteyi Yeni Kazanmış Öğrencilerin Bilgisayar Okuryazarlık Düzeyleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 17 (3), 983-1000. CR - Kubiatko, M., Uşak, M., Yılmaz, K. ve Tasar, M. F. (2010). A cross-national study of Czech and Turkish university students’ attitudes towards ict used in science subjects. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 9(2), 119-134. CR - Kumpulainen, K., & Gillen, J. (2017). Young children’s digital literacy practices in the home: a review of the literature. COST ACTION ISI1410 DigiLitEY. CR - Leffler, M. E. (2015). Digitally divided in Jackson: Are students getting the digital literacy skills they need to succeed? (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Jackson State University. CR - Lewis, T. E., & Alirezabeigi, S. (2018). Studying with the Internet: Giorgio Agamben, education, and new digital technologies. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 1-14. CR - López, N. M. M., Robles, A. C. G., Gómez, A. C. T., & Hernández, J. A. (2017). Digital literacy to parents in the use of social networks. Alteridad: Revista de Educación, 12(1), 8-19. CR - Maden, S., Banaz, E., Maden, A. (2018). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının dijital ortamlardaki yazma alışkanlıkları. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 7 (1). CR - Maxwell, C. E., & Maxwell, E. M. (2014). Gender differences in digital literacy among undergraduate students of faculty of education, Kogi State university: implications for e-resources & library use. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 1(7), 96-108. CR - McDougall, J., Readman, M., & Wilkinson, P. (2018). The uses of (digital) literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 1-17. CR - Mikelic Preradovic, N., Lešin, G., & Šagud, M. (2016). Investigating parents' attitudes towards digital technology use in early childhood: a case study from Croatia. Informatics in Education, 15(1), 127-146. CR - Murray, J. (2013). How to teach your students digital citizenship. Retrieved October 6, 2014 from:http://www.aplatformforgood.org/blog/entry/how-to-teach-yourstudents-Digital citizenship. CR - Ocak, G., & Karakuş, G. (2018). Pre-Service teachers’ digital literacy self-efficacy scale development. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(5), 1427-1436. CR - Porat, E., Blau, I., & Barak, A. (2018). Measuring digital literacies: Junior high-school students' perceived competencies versus actual performance. Computers & Education, 126, 23-36. CR - Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G.W. (2013). The digital divide: the ınternet and social inequality in international perspective. New York: RoutledgeSchartman, S. (2012). K-12 parents digital literacy survey. 28.09.2018 tarihinde https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313152281_ adresinden alınmıştır. CR - Smith, B.N. & Necessary, J.R. 1996. Assessing the computer literacy of undergraduatecollege students. Education, 117(2), 188-194. CR - Starr, L. (2012, March 31). Encouraging teacher technology use. Education World. 138 Retrieved from: http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech159.shtml CR - Svensson, M., & Baelo, R. (2015). Teacher students’ perceptions of their digital competence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1527-1534.Techataweewan, CR - Tyger, R. L. (2011). Teacher candidates' digital literacy and their technology integration efficacy. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Southern University). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.georgiaso uthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1557&context=etd. CR - W., & Prasertsin, U. (2018). Development of digital literacy indicators for Thai undergraduate students using mixed method research. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39(2), 215-221. CR - Volman, M. (1997). Gender-related effects of computer and information literacy education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29(3), 315-328. CR - Zin, N. A. M., Zaman, H. B., Judi, H. M., Mukti, N. A., Amin, H. M., Sahran, S., ... & Abdullah, Z. (2000). Gender differences in computer literacy level among undergraduate students in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 1(1), 1-8. UR - https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.466549 L1 - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/675173 ER -