TY  - JOUR
T1  - Entropi ve Waspas Yöntemleri Kullanılarak Türkiye İçin Uygun Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynağının Seçimi
TT  - The Selection of Appropriate Renewable Energy Source For Turkey By Using Entropy and Waspas Methods
AU  - Karaca, Coşkun
AU  - Ulutaş, Alptekin
PY  - 2018
DA  - July
JF  - Ege Academic Review
JO  - eab
PB  - Ege Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1303-099X
SP  - 483
EP  - 494
VL  - 18
IS  - 3
LA  - tr
AB  - Üretim için vazgeçilmez bir girdi olan enerji, üretim ve tüketimiyle çevre ve insan sağlığı üzerinde negatif dışsallıklara neden olmakta ve ülke kalkınmasına zarar vermektedir. Bu nedenle ülkeler enerji kaynağı seçimi yaparken iki temel motivasyonla hareket etmektedir. İlki enerji kaynağının sağladığı üretim artışını ve rekabet gücünü dikkate alarak güçlü bir ekonomiye sahip olmak, ikincisi ise halkın refahını düşürecek enerji kaynak seçiminden uzak durmaktadır. Ülkemiz için uygun olabilecek enerji kaynak seçiminin yapıldığı bu çalışmada Entropi yöntemi yardımıyla yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarına ait teknik, ekonomik, çevresel ve sosyal kriterler, önem derecesine göre sıralanmış ve ikinci aşamada WASPAS yöntemiyle Türkiye’de enerji ihtiyacının karşılanmasında uygun yenilenebilir enerji kaynağının hangisi olabileceği yönünde öneri getirilmiştir. WASPAS yönteminden elde edilen sonuçlar Türkiye için yatırım yapılabilecekuygun yenilenebilir enerji kaynak sıralamasının Hidro, Jeotermal, Rüzgâr, Biyokütle, Güneş şeklinde olduğunu göstermiştir.
KW  - Yenilenebilir enerji seçimi
KW  - çok kriterli karar verme
KW  - Entropi
KW  - WASPAS
N2  - The production and consumption of energy, whichare indispensable inputs for production, causenegative externalities on the environment andhuman health as well as harm the developmentof the country. Therefore, countries have two basicmotivations when selecting energy source. The firstis to have a strong economy by taking into accountthe increase in production and competitive powerprovided by the energy source, and the second isto avoid the selection of energy source that willreduce the prosperity of the people. The technical,economic, environmental and social criteria ofrenewable energy sources are ranked with respectto their importance degree by means of Entropymethod in this study where the energy sourceselection which can be suitable for our countryis made. In this study where the energy sourceselection which can be suitable for our country ismade and in second stage the WASPAS method isused to suggest which renewable energy sourceis the most suitable to meet the energy demandin Turkey. The results obtained in WASPAS methodindicated the ranking of renewable energy sources,which are the suitable for investment in Turkey, asHydro, Geothermal, Wind, Biomass, Solar.
CR  - BP (2016a). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016,
Carbon dioxide emissions, 65th edition, http://www.bp.com/
content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review-
2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-2016-co2-
emissions.pdf, (10.05.2017)
CR  - BP (2016b). BP Statistical Review of World Energy June 2016.
http://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/pdf/energy-economics/
statistical-review-2016/bp-statistical-review-of-world-energy-
2016-full-report.pdf, (10.05.2017)
CR  - EESI (2016). Fossil Fuels. http://www.eesi.org/topics/fossil-fuels/
description, (10.05.2017)
CR  - EİA (2016), “Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New
Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2016”,
US Energy Information Administration, http://www.eia.gov/
outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf , (10.05.2017)
CR  - ETKB (2015). İstatistikler, Denge Tabloları, Enerji İşleri
Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, http://www.eigm.gov.tr/tr-TR/
Denge-Tablolari/Denge-Tablolari, (10.05.2017)
CR  - Görez, T. ve Alkan, A. (2005), “Türkiye’nin Yenilenebilir Enerji
Kaynakları ve Hidroelektrik Enerji Potansiyeli”, III. Yenilenebilir
Enerji Kaynakları Sempozyumu, Mersin, 19-21.
CR  - IEA (2015). “IEA Energy Atlas”, IEA Statistic, http://energyatlas.
iea.org/?subject=-1002896040, (10.05.2017)
CR  - IPCC (2007). Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Fourth
Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change, 12-17 November 2007, Valencia, Spain, https://
www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr.pdf,
(10.05.2017)
CR  - IPCC (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis,
Summary for Policymakers, Technical Summary and Frequently
Asked Questions. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change.
CR  - IPCC (2014), “IPCC Working Group III-Mitigation of Climate
Change, Annex III: Technology-Specific Cost and Performance
Parameters”, https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/
wg3/ipcc_wg3_ar5_annex-iii.pdf, (10.05.2017)
CR  - IRENA (2016) Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2016.
International Renewable Energy Agency. http://www.irena.
org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/IRENA_RE_Jobs_Annual_
Review_2016.pdf (10.05.2017)
CR  - Kayakutlu, G. ve Ercan, S. (2015), “Regional Energy Portfolio
Construction: Case Studies in Turkey. In Sustainable Future
Energy Technology and Supply Chains”, Springer International
Publishing, 107-126.
CR  - Kenny, R., Law, C. ve Pearce, J.M. (2010), “Towards Real Energy
Economics: Energy Policy Driven by Life-Cycle Carbon Emission”,
Energy Policy, 38(4), 1969-1978.
CR  - Li, X., Wang, K., Liu, L., Xin, J., Yang, H. ve Gao, C. (2011)”Application
of the entropy weight and TOPSIS method in safety evaluation
of coal mines.” Procedia Engineering, 26 : 2085-2091.
CR  - Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad,
S., Saman, M. Z. M. ve Ibrahim, O. (2017) “A systematic review
and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory
and applications with recent fuzzy developments.” Applied
Soft Computing, 52: 265-292.
CR  - NETL (2013), “Power Generation Technology Comparison from
a Life Cycle Perspective”, National Energy Technology Laboratory,
US Department of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, https://
www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/
Life%20Cycle%20Analysis/Technology-Assessment-Compilation-
Report.pdf, (10.05.2017)
CR  - OECD (2015). OECD Employment Outlook 2015, Paris, http://
www.oecd.org/els/oecd-employment-outlook-19991266.
htm, (10.05.2017)
CR  - REN21 (2015), “Renewables 2015 Global Status Report”, Renewable
Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century, http://
www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/GSR2015_Key-
Findings_lowres.pdf, (10.05.2017)
CR  - Rutovitz, J. (2010), “South African Energy Sector Jobs to 2030”,
Greenpeace Africa by the Institute for Sustainable Futures,
University of Technology, Sydney, Greenpeace Africa, Johannesburg.
CR  - Rutovitz, J. ve Harris, S. (2012), “Calculating Global Energy
Sector Jobs: 2012 Methodology”, Prepared for Greenpeace International
by the Institute for Sustainable Futures, University
of Technology, Sydney.
CR  - Stein, E.W. (2013), “A Comprehensive Multi-Criteria Model to
Rank Electric Energy Production Technologies”, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22, 640-654. https://e3garden.
com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/RSER2418_Stein.pdf,
(10.05.2017)
CR  - TCMB (2015). Ödemeler Dengesi İstatistikleri, http://www.
tcmb.gov.tr/wps/wcm/connect/30cdfd52-aa34-40ce-8b57-
4ef53e322ce4/odemelerdengesi.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=
30cdfd52-aa34-40ce-8b57-4ef53e322ce4, (10.05.2017)
CR  - TEİAŞ (2016) Türkiye Elektrik Üretim-İletim İstatistikleri. Türkiye
Elektrik İletim A.Ş. Genel Müdürlüğü. http://www.teias.gov.
tr/T%C3%BCrkiyeElektrik%C4%B0statistikleri/istatistik2015/
istatistik2015.htm, (10.05.2017)
CR  - TEİAŞ (2016), “Türkiye 2015 Yılı Elektrik Üretim-İletim
İstatistikleri”, Türkiye Elektrik İletim A.Ş. Genel Müdürlüğü
Planlama ve Stratejik Yönetim Dairesi Başkanliği Üretim Planlama
ve İstatistik Müdürlüğü, Ankara, http://www.teias.gov.
tr/T%C3%BCrkiyeElektrik%C4%B0statistikleri/istatistik2015/
istatistik2015.htm, (10.05.2017)
CR  - UNFCCC (2015). GHG Data: GHG total including LULUCF, United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, http://
unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc/time_series_annex_i/
items/3842.php, (10.05.2017)
CR  - US Energy Information Administration (2015), “Levelized Cost
and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources
in the Annual Energy Outlook”, http://www.eia.gov/outlooks/
archive/aeo15/pdf/electricity_generation_2015.pdf,
(10.05.2017)
CR  - Wang, T. C. ve Lee, H. D. (2009) “Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS
approach based on subjective weights and objective weights.”
Expert Systems with Applications, 36(5): 8980-8985.
CR  - Zavadskas, E. K. ve Turskis, Z. (2010) “A new additive ratio
assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making.”
Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2):
159-172.
CR  - Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., Antucheviciene, J. ve Zakarevicius,
A. (2012) “Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product
assessment.” Elektronika ir elektrotechnika, 122(6): 3-6.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/eab/article/500046
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/602103
ER  -