        TY  - JOUR
T1  - Çeviribilimde Ortak Zemin Arayışları: Disiplinin Gidişatına Özdüşünümsel Bir Bakış
TT  - In Search of Common Ground in Translatology: A Self-Reflective Look into Discipline’s Trajectory
AU  - Erbek, Murat
PY  - 2019
DA  - February
DO  - 10.37599/ceviri.519317
JF  - Çeviribilim ve Uygulamaları Dergisi
PB  - Hacettepe Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2687-2846
SP  - 129
EP  - 142
IS  - 25
LA  - tr
AB  - Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, çeviribilimin 1972’den günümüze kadar geçirmiş olduğu gelişim süre-cine ilişkin özdüşünümsel bir bakış sunmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, mevcut çalışma çeviribilimin “çeviri” olgusu etrafında kümelenen sorunsalları ele almayı hedefleyen bir akademik alan olaraközerkleşme yolunda hâlâ karşı karşıya olduğu zorlukları ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. JamesHolmes çeviri odaklı araştırmaları ayrı bir bilim dalı olarak bütünleşme ve birleşmeye çağıralı nere-deyse bir yarım asır geçmiş olmasına rağmen çeviri odaklı araştırmalar alanı günümüzde hâlâ temelbilim-kuramsal sorunlarla mücadele etmektedir: Bu çalışma, çeviribilim alanında araştırma odağı(nesnesi) konusunda genel bir fikir birliği eksikliğinin yaşandığını göstermektedir; bunun sonucuolarak da çeviribilim hâlâ dilbilim, metindilbilim, edebiyatbilim, psikolinguistik, iletişimbilim, kültüraraştırmaları ve sosyoloji gibi birçok bilim dalından terim, kavram ve kuram ödünç almaya devam etmektedir. Bu “dolaysız” disiplinlerarası etkileşim çeviribilim alanının translation studies, traductologíave traductologie gibi birçok araştırma geleneğine bölünüp parçalanmasına sebep olmaktadır. Çeviri-bilimcilerin alandaki birlikteliğin ve “ortak zemin”in kaybolmaya başladığıyla ilgili kaygılarına derlemekaynak ve antoloji yayınlarında da sıkça rastlanmaktadır. Fakat buna karşın günümüzde gelinen nokta,araştırmacıların çeviri olgusunu tüm unsurlarıyla açıklamaya hizmet edecek salt çeviribilimsel modeller oluşturmayı denemek yerine hâlâ diğer bilim dallarından model ve metodoloji ithal etmeye devamettiklerini göstermektedir. Çeviribilimin yukarıda değinilen genel görünümü de göz önünde bulundu-rularak, bu çalışmada sistematik çeviri odaklı gözlem zemini oluşturma olanakları tartışılmaktadır.Nitekim sistematik çeviri odaklı gözlem zemininin tesis edilmesi, alanımızda yıllardır yaşanan bilim-kuramsal sorunların çözümüne katkıda bulunacaktır.
KW  - çeviribilim
KW  - özdüşünüm
KW  - görgül bilim dalı
KW  - çeviri odaklı gözlem
N2  - The main goal of this paper is to provide a self-reflective look into the trajectory of translatology(Translationswissenschaft) from 1972 to the present. In accordance with this purpose, it aims to ad-dress the challenges which the discipline is still facing trying to achieve its autonomy as an academicfield of research which should deal with the problems clustered round the phenomenon of “translation”. Although almost a half century has passed since James Holmes’ call for the consolidation oftranslation-oriented research as a separate discipline, the field of translation-oriented research isstill struggling with basic scientific-theoretical problems: This study shows that there is still a lackof a general consensus regarding the research scope, i.e., the research object of the discipline as aresult of which translatology keeps borrowing terms, notions and theories from various disciplinessuch as linguistics, text linguistics, literary studies, psycholinguistics, communication studies, cultural studies and, last but not least, sociology. This “direct” interdisciplinary interaction has led to apersistent fragmentation of the discipline into several research traditions such as translation studies,traductología and traductologie. Signs of scholars’ concerns of losing the communality and “common ground” in the discipline are also manifest in the publication of handbooks and readers. How-ever, the resulting situation today shows that scholars still import models and methodologies fromother disciplines, let alone try to set proper translatological models which can serve to explain thephenomenon of translation with all its components. Taking also the overall picture of the disciplinementioned above into consideration, this study aims to discuss possible ways of creating a systematic translation-oriented observation structure which can help settling the main scientific-theoreticaldisputes in the discipline.
CR  - Buden, B. (2005). Der Schacht von Babel. Ist Kultur übersetzbar? Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos.
CR  - Chesterman, A. &amp; Arrojo, R. (2000). Forum: Shared Ground in Translation Studies. Target, 12(1), 151-160. doi:10.1075/target.12.1.08che
CR  - Dizdar, D. (2006). Translation: Um- und Irrwege. Berlin: Frank und Timme.
CR  - Echeverri, Á. (2017). About maps, versions and translations of Translation Studies: a look into the metaturn of translatology. Perspectives, 25(4), 521-539. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2017.1290665
CR  - Even-Zohar, I. (1990). The Position of Translated Literature within the Literary Polysystem. Polysystem Studies [=Poetics Today], 1(11), 45-51.
CR  - Gerzymisch-Arbogast, H. (1994). Übersetzungswissenschaftliches Propädeutikum. Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
CR  - Gutt, E. A. (2000). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Manchester: St. Jerome.
CR  - Hermans, T. (2002). Preface. In T. Hermans (Ed.), Crosscultural Transgressions. Research Models in Translation Studies II: Historical and Ideological Issues (s. 1-7). Manchester: St. Jerome.
CR  - Hermans, T. (2006). Descriptive Translation Studies. M. Snell-Hornby, H. G. Hönig, P. Kußmaul, &amp; P. A. Schmitt (Dü) içinde, Handbuch Translation (K. Kaindl, Çev., 2. geliştirilmiş b., s. 96-100). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
CR  - Holmes, J. S. (1988). The Name and Nature of Translation Studies. In Translated!: Papers on Literary Translation and Translation Studies; with an introduction by Raymond van den Broeck (s. 67-80). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
CR  - Hönig, H. G. &amp; Kußmaul, P. (1982). Strategie der Übersetzung: Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
CR  - İşcen, İ. (2002). Çevrim Kuramı - Çeviribilim›in Temelleri Üzerine. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
CR  - İşcen, İ. (2008). Transformation und übersetzungswissenschaftliche Forschung - Zu den Grundproblemen der Übersetzungswissenschaft. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.
CR  - İşcen, İ. (2010). Çeviribilim İçinde Söylem ve Çeviribilimsel Gerçeklik. Çeviribilim ve Uygulamaları Dergisi(20), 1-15.
CR  - Jäger, G. (1975). Translation und Translationslinguistik. Halle (Saale): VEB Max Niemeyer.
CR  - Kade, O. (1968). Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeiten in der Übersetzung. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie. Kade, O. (1977). Vermittelte Kommunikation, Sprachmittlung, Translation. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
CR  - Kuhn, T. S. (2017). Bilimsel Devrimlerin Yapısı (9. b.). (N. Kuyaş, Çev.) İstanbul: Kırmızı Yayınları.
CR  - Nida, E. (1945). Linguistics and Ethnology in Translation-Problems. Word, 1(2), 194-208.
CR  - Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating - With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
CR  - Nida, E. A. &amp; Taber, C. (1969). The Theory and Practice of Translation. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
CR  - Prunč, E. (2002). Einführung in die Translationswissenschaft. Graz: Institut für Theoretische und Angewandte Translationswissenschaft der Universität Graz.
CR  - Reiß, K. (1971). Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Übersetzungskritik: Kategorien und Kriterien für eine sachgerechte Beurteilung von Übersetzungen. München: Max Hueber.
CR  - Reiß, K. &amp; Vermeer, H. J. (1984). Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
CR  - Siever, H. (2015). Übersetzungswissenschaft: Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
CR  - Snell-Hornby, M. (1986). Einleitung. In M. Snell-Hornby (Ed.), Übersetzungswissenschaft - Eine Neuorientierung: Zur Integrierung von Theorie und Praxis (s. 9-29). Tübingen: Francke Verlag.
  
Snell-Hornby, M., Hönig, H. G., Kußmaul, P. &amp; Schmitt, P. A. (2006). Vorwort. In M. Snell-Hornby, H. G. Hönig, P. Kußmaul, &amp; P. A. Schmitt (Eds.), Handbuch Translation (p. V). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
CR  - Stolze, R. (2003). Hermeneutik und Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
CR  - Stolze, R. (2008). Übersetzungstheorien: Eine Einführung (5. ed.). Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.
CR  - Störig, H. J. (1969). Einleitung. In H. J. Störig (Ed.), Das Problem des Übersetzens (2. ed., s. VII-XXXIII). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
CR  - Venuti, L. (2000). The Translation Studies Reader. New York: Roudledge.
CR  - Vinay, J. P. &amp; Darbelnet, J. (1958). Stylistique Comparée du Français et de L’anglais: Méthode de Traduction. Paris: Marcel Didier.
CR  - Yıldırım, C. (2016). Bilim Felsefesi. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
CR  - Zanettin, F., Saldanha, G. &amp; Harding, S.-A. (2015). Sketching landscapes in translation studies: A bibliographic study. Perspectives, 161-182. doi:10.1080/0907676X.2015.1010551
CR  - Zybatow, L. (2013). Auf der Suche nach Translationstheorie(n): Zwischenbilanz und Standortbestimmung der Translationswissenschaft. In F. Grucza (Ed.), Vielheit und Einheit der Germanistik weltweit (Akten des XII. Internationalen Germanistenkongresses Warschau 2010) (s. 283 - 293). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.37599/ceviri.519317
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/636835
ER  -