TY  - JOUR
T1  - Adaletin Kantçı Zemini
TT  - Kantian Grounds of Justice
AU  - Yalçın, Özgür
PY  - 2019
DA  - March
DO  - 10.20981/kaygi.540105
JF  - Kaygı. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi
JO  - Kaygı
PB  - Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2645-8950
SP  - 276
EP  - 287
VL  - 18
IS  - 1
LA  - tr
AB  - Siyaset felsefesinin temel sorunu,bireysel özgürlük ile siyasal otoriteyi bağdaştırmaktır. Adalet kavrayışları bireyselözgürlük ile siyasal otorite arasındaki ilişkinin nasıl kurulması gerektiğinibelirlerler. Özellikle Kantçı siyaset felsefesinde bireysel özgürlük düşüncesiadaletin temelini veren ilkedir. Ancak, Kantçılar arasında özgürlüğün siyasaladalet bağlamında nasıl anlaşılması gerektiği konusunda anlaşmazlık vardır.Rainer Forst’un çalışmaları Kant’ın siyaset felsefesini özgürlüğü ahlakiözerklik temelinde derinlemesine ve bütünsel olarak yeniden inşagirişimlerinden birini örneklemektedir. Bu makalede ilk olarak Rainer Forst’unsiyasal adalet kavrayışını tanıtıp eleştirel bir şekilde değerlendiriyorum.Sonrasında, Forst’un Kantçı siyasal adalet yorumuna alternatif olarak, ahlakiözerkliğe dayanmayan, daha kabul edilebilir bir Kantçı siyasal adalet kavrayışınıönererek kısaca tartışıyorum. Kant’ın doğuştan özgürlüğe hakkı olmadüşüncesinin siyasal adaletin temelini veren ilke olduğunu ileri sürüyorum.
KW  - Kant
KW  - Özerklik
KW  - Özgürlük
KW  - Adalet
KW  - Gerekçelendirme
N2  - The fundamental problem of politicalphilosophy is reconciling individual freedom and political authority.Conceptions of justice specify how the relationship between individual freedomand political authority is to be established. The idea of individual freedom isspecifically the grounding principle of justice for Kantian politicalphilosophy. However, there is a disagreement between Kantians on the questionof how freedom should be conceived in the context of political justice. RainerForst’s works exemplify one of the most elaborate attempts to reconstructKant’s political philosophy grounded in freedom as moral autonomy. In thispaper, I first introduce and assess critically Rainer Forst’s conception ofpolitical justice. Then, as an alternative to Forst’s Kantian interpretation ofpolitical justice, I propose and briefly discuss a more acceptable conceptionof Kantian idea of political justice, which is not based on moral autonomy. Iargue that Kant’s idea of freedom as an innate right is the grounding principleof political justice.
CR  - BENHABİB, Seyla (2015). “The Uses and Abuses of Kantian Rigorism. On Rainer Forst’s Moral and Political Philosophy”, Political Theory, 43(6): 777-792.
CR  - FLIKSCHUH, Katrin (2010). “Justice without virtue”, Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: A Critical Guide, ed. L. Denis, pp. 51-70, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - FLIKSCHUH, Katrin (2012). “Elusive Unity: The General Will in Hobbes and Kant”, Hobbes Studies, 25(1): 21-42.
CR  - FLIKSCHUH, Katrin (2013). “Personal autonomy and public authority”, Kant on Moral Autonomy, ed. O. Sensen, pp. 169-190, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - FORST, Rainer (2011). The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, New York: Columbia University Press.
CR  - FORST, Rainer (2014a). Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, Cambridge: Polity Press.
CR  - FORST, Rainer (2014b). “Legitimitaet, Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit: Zur Reflexivitaet normativer Ordnungen”, Deliberative Kritik – Kritik der Deliberation, eds. O. Flügel-Martinsen, D. Gaus, T. Hitzel-Cassagnes, F. Martinsen, pp. 137-147, Wiesbaden: Springer.
CR  - FORST, Rainer (2015). “Transnational Justice and Non-Domination: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach”, Domination and Global Political Justice: Conceptual, Historical, and Institutional Perspectives, eds. B. Buckinx, J. Trejo-Mathys, and T. Waligore, pp. 88-110. New York: Routledge.
CR  - GOSEPATH, Stefan (2015). “Democracy and Moral Rights”, Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation, eds. R. Celikates, R. Kreide, and T. Wesche, pp. 193-211. London: Rowman and Littefield.
CR  - KANT, Immanuel (1991). “The Metaphysics of Morals”, Political Writings, trans. by H. B. Nisbet, ed. Hans Reiss, pp. 131-175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CR  - RIPSTEIN, Arthur (2009). Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
CR  - RIPSTEIN, Arthur (2015). “Means and Ends”, Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal and Political Thought, 6(1): 1-23.
CR  - WARNKE, Georgia (2013). “Deliberation and interpretation”, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39(8): 755-770.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.20981/kaygi.540105
L1  - http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/671143
ER  -