TY  - JOUR
T1  - UNDERSTANDING PRIVILEGED PARTNERSHIP DISCOURSE ON THE BASIS OF TURKEY AND THE EUROPEAN UNION RELATION
TT  - İMTİYAZLI ORTAKLIK SÖYLEMİNİ TÜRKİYE-AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ İLİŞKİLERİ ÜZERİNDEN ANLAMAK
AU  - Turan, İdris
AU  - Akçay, Ekrem Yaşar
AU  - Kanat, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Selim
PY  - 2019
DA  - August
JF  - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
JO  - SDU SBE
PB  - Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1304-6373
SP  - 29
EP  - 47
IS  - 34
LA  - en
AB  - This study elaborates on the discourse of“Privileged Partnership”, a concept which is frequently visited particularly inthe relations between Turkey and the European Union. The word privilege may bedefined as special rights and conditions not granted to everyone bearing positiverepercussions in its meaning. Although this term is considered have a positiveimpact on the relations between Turkey and the EU, it is observed to cause anegative impact on the contrary. In this context, the option of Privileged Partnershipbrought to the agenda with the relations between Turkey and the EU will betackled along with all its details pertaining to both the relations of the EUwith third parties and Turkey. This study will explore the definition of theconcept Privileged Partnership via various examples. Followed by thisdefinition, this partnership model in the European Union and its legal basiswill be explained while investigating whether the European Union hasestablished such a relationship with a third country or not. In this regard,the discourse of Privileged Partnership will specifically be analyzed in thecontext of Turkey-EU relations, arguing that such a partnership between the twoparties will lead to negative model of Privileged Partnership for Turkey
KW  - Turkey
KW  - European Union
KW  - Privileged Partnership
KW  - Third Country
KW  - Association Relation
N2  - Bu çalışma, özellikle Türkiye-AB ilişkilerindesıkça kullanılan “İmtiyazlı Ortaklık” söylemini ele alacaktır. Başkalarınatanınmayan özel hak ve şart olarak tanımlanabilecek olan imtiyaz, pozitif biranlam da taşımaktadır. Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinde de pozitif bir yanının olacağıdüşünülen İmtiyazlı Ortaklık seçeneği Türkiye ile AB arasındaki ilişkilerde tamtersine negatif bir etkiye neden olmaktadır. Bu bağlamda Türkiye-AB ilişkilerdegündeme gelen İmtiyazlı Ortaklık seçeneği hem AB’nin üçüncü ülkelerleilişkilerinde hem de Türkiye ile ilişkilerinde bütün detaylarıyla elealınacaktır. Bu şekilde çalışma, öncelikli olarak İmtiyazlı Ortaklık kavramınıntanımını örneklerle anlatmaya çalışacaktır. Daha sonra Avrupa Birliğinde bu türbir ortaklık modelini, hukuki dayanağını, Avrupa Birliğinin üçüncü bir ülke ilebu tür bir ilişki kurup kurmadığını ele alacaktır. Daha sonra Türkiye-ABilişkileri bağlamında İmtiyazlı Ortaklık söylemi ele alınacak ve iki tarafarasında böyle bir ortaklık olması durumunda Türkiye açısından muhtemelen negatifbir İmtiyazlı Ortaklık modelinin olacağı ileri sürülecektir
CR  - Afacan, I. (2013). European Union and Turkey: Converging Interests Separate Paths?. Accessed date: 23.02.2019, http://www.turkishreview.org/tr/newsDetail_getNewsById.action?newsId=223321
CR  - Ahren, R. (2014). EU offers unprecedented aid to Israelis, Palestinians for peace deal. Accessed date: 25.02.2019, http://www.timesofisrael.com/eu-offers-unprecedented-aid-to-israelis-palestinians-for-peace-deal/.
CR  - Akdeniz, A. (2013). EU-Turkey Relations: Towards a Constructive Re-engagement?. Accessed date: 28.02.2019, http://tesev.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/EU_Turkey_Relations_Towards_A_Constructive_Re-engagement.pdf
CR  - Altıntaş, V. and Marchetti, A. (2005). The Tough Topics in Accession Negotiations, EU-Turkey Monitor, 1 (1), 1-8.
CR  - Atılgan, C. and Deborah K. (2006). EU Integration Models Beyond Full Membership, Working Paper, 158, 1-18.
CR  - Aybet, G. (2006). Tukey and the EU After the First Year of Negotiations:  Reconciling Internal and External Policy Challenges, Security Dialogue, 37 (4), 529-549.
CR  - Barysch, K.. (2007). What Europeans Think About Turkey and Why, Centre for European Reform, 1392, 1-6.
CR  - Barysch, K.. (2011). Is Turkey Our Partner Now, Accessed date: 13.03.2019, http://www.cer.org.uk/publications/archive/bulletin-article/2011/turkey-our-partner-now
CR  - Birand, M. A. (2013). Merkel Should Either Explain or Give Up Privileged Partnership. Accessed date: 16.03.2019, http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/default.aspx?pageid=438&n=merkel-should-either-explain-or-give-up-privileged-partnership-2009-07-16
CR  - Carey, M. (2013). We Hear You Knocking. Accessed date: 21.03.2019, http://www.paperjam.lu/article/fr/we-hear-you-knocking
CR  - Council of the EU. (2006). European Council 14-15th December 2006, Presidency Conclusions. Accessed date: 20.03.2019, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/92202.pdf
CR  - Eur-Lex. (2012). Treaty of European Union. Accessed date: 19.03.2019, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012M%2FTXT
CR  - European Commission. (1993). European Council in Copenhagen Conclusions of the Presidency 21-22Haziran 1993. Accessed date: 17.03.2019, http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/72921.pdf
CR  - European Commission. (2012). Relations Tunisie-Union Europeenne: Un Partenariat Privilegie Plan D’Action 2013-2017. Accessed date: 15.03.2019, http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/tunisia/documents/press_corner/plan_action_tunisie_ue_2013_2017_fr.pdf
CR  - Füle, S. (2012). Privileged Partnership: Moving EU-Tunisia Cooperation to A Higher Level. Accessed date: 14.03.2019, http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/fule/headlines/news/2012/11/20121119_cs.htm
CR  - Gordon, P. and Taşpınar, O. (2004). Turkey’s European Quest: The EU’s Decision on Turkish Accession, U.S.-Europe Analysis Series, 6, 1-6.
CR  - Hillion, C. (2013). The EU Neighbourhood Competence Under Article 8 TEU, Notre Europe Policy Paper,  69, 1-7.
CR  - House of Commons Business and Enterprise Committee. (2008). Keeping Door Wide Open: Turkey and EU Accession, Seventh Report of Session 2007-2008, 1, 1-20.
CR  - Hugg, P. R. (1999). The Republic of Turkey in Europe: Reconsidering the Luxembourg Exclusion, Fordham International Law Journal, 23 (3), 1-103.
CR  - Independent Commission on Turkey. (2004). Turkey in Europe: More than a promise. Report of the Independent Commission on Turkey. Accessed date: 12.03.2019, https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/english.pdf
CR  - Insel, A. (2002). Boosting Negotiations with Turkey: What Can France Do?, Global Turkey in Europe Policy Brief,  4, 1-5.
CR  - Karakaş, C. (2006). Gradual Integration: An Attractive Alternative Integration Process for Turkey and the EU, European Foreign Affairs Review, 11 (3), 311-331.
CR  - Kardaş, Ş. (2013). Merkel and Sarkozy Call for Privileged Partnership Angers Turkey. Accessed date: 10.03.2019, http://www.jamestowS.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=34983
CR  - Katcher, B. (2013). Moving Away From Privileged Partnership?. Accessed date: 08.03.2019, http://washingtonnote.com/moving_away_fro/
CR  - Köksal, A. (2011). A Comparative Approach to Privileged Partnership: Is Turkey Really Different?, Boğaziçi Journal, 25 (2). 27-57.
CR  - Kovacheva, R. (2013). Will Turkey enter Europe with an open face?. Accessed date: 07.03.2019,  http://www.euinside.eu/en/analyses/european-face-of-turkey-role-or-necessity
CR  - Kösebalaban, H. (2007). The Permanent Other? Turkey and the Question of European Identity, Mediterranean Quarterly, 18 (4), 87-111.
CR  - Lindsey, D. (2013). The World from Berlin: Angela Merkel’s Privileged Provocation in Turkey. Accessed date: 04.03.2019, http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/the-world-from-berlin-angela-merkel-s-privileged-provocation-in-turkey-a-686485.html
CR  - Mahlut, M. (2010). A Comparative Study of Capitulation Word with Concession Word in Terms of Historical Perspective at the Beginning of the 20th Century, History Studies, 2 (2), 401-413.
CR  - Maresceau, M. (2012). Turkey: A Candidate State for the Union. Niamh Nic Shuibhne and Laurence V. Gormley (eds.). From Single Market to Economic Union: Essays in Memory of John A. Usher. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83-99.
CR  - Müftüler-Baç, M. (2007). Turkey’s Accession To The European Union: Does Culture and Identity Play A Role?,  Ankara Review of European Studies, 6 (2), 31-50.
CR  - Offical Journal of the European Union. (1994). EEA Agreement. Accessed date: 03.03.2019 http://ec.europa.eu/world/agreements/downloadFile.do?fullText=yes&treatyTransId=448
CR  - Ozkırımlı, U. (2008). Milliyetçilik ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri. İstanbul: TESEV Yayınları.
CR  - Pamir, A. (2002). Kapitülasyon Kavramı ve Osmanlı Devletine Etkileri, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 51 (2), 79-119.
CR  - Polenz, R. (2010). Better for Both of Them: Turkey Ought to be ın the EU, Körber Policy Paper, 12, 1-25.
CR  - Pope, H. (2013). The EU-Turkey Cyprus Triangle. Accessed date: 01.03.2019, http://www.cfr.org/turkey/icg-eu-turkey-cyprus-triangle-turkey-armenia-vow-heal-past-wounds/p20189
CR  - Rahigh-Aghsan, A. (2011). Turkey’s EU Quest and Political Cleavages under JDP, Review of European Studies, 3 (1), 43-53.
CR  - Schmitt, H. (1987). The Privileged Partnership: Franco-German Relations in the European Community (1969-1984) by Haig Simonian, The Journal of Modern History, 59 (3), 564-566.
UR  - http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sbe/issue//563331
L1  - http://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/773847
ER  -