TY  - JOUR
T1  - Pes Planuslu Olan ve Olmayan Üniversite Öğrencisi Kadın Bireylerde Statik Dengenin Değerlendirilmesi
TT  - Evaluation of Static Balance in University Students with and without Pes Planus
AU  - Takinacı, Zuhal Didem
AU  - Zararsız, Ümran
PY  - 2019
DA  - October
JF  - Sağlık Profesyonelleri Araştırma Dergisi
JO  - Sağlık Pro Arş Dergisi
PB  - Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2687-4423
SP  - 8
EP  - 12
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
LA  - tr
AB  - Amaç: Çalışma pes planuslu olanve olmayan üniversite öğrencisi kadınlarda statik dengenin değerlendirilmesiamacı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Araştırma SağlıkBilimleri Fakültesi Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü’nde gerçekleştirilmiştir. 21kadın öğrenci çalışmaya alınmıştır. Katılımcıların pes planuslu olupolmadıklarına navikular düşme testi ile bakılmıştır. Statik dengeleri Flamingodenge testi ile ölçülmüştür. Bulgular: Yaş ortalaması 20.62±0.97 olan üniversite öğrenci kadın bireylerleyapılan çalışmada, pes planusu olan (n=13) ve pes planusu olmayan (n=8)gruplarla yapılan değerlendirmelerde, statik denge arasında anlamlı bir farkbulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Ayrıca, fiziksel aktivite yapıp yapmamak ile statikdenge karşılaştırılmasında da anlamlı fark görülmemiştir (p>0.05). Sonuç: Pes planus olup olmamanınstatik dengeyi etkilemediği sonucuna varılmıştır.
KW  - pes planus
KW  - statik denge
N2  - Aim: The aim of this study wasto evaluate the static balance in university students with and without pesplanus. Method: Theresearch was carried out in the physiotherapy and rehabilitation department ofhealth sciences faculty. 21 female students were included in the study. The naviculardrop test was used to determine whether the participants had pes planus. staticbalances were measured by flamingo balance test. Results:In the study conducted with female students with a mean age of 20.62±0.97, no significant difference was found between the presence of pes planus andstatic balance (p> 0.05) in the evaluations made with the groups with pesplanus(n=13) and without pes planus (n=8). In addition, there was nosignificant difference between physical activity and static balance (p>0.05). Conclusion: ıt was concluded that the presence of pes planus did not affectthe static balance.
CR  - 1. ARINCI K, ELHAN A, (2001). Anatomi, 3.Baskı 2. Cilt Güneş Kitapevi, Ankara
CR  - 2. WILLIAMS PL, BANNISTER LH, BERRY MM, COLLINS P, DYSON M, DUSSEK JE et al. (1989), Grays Anatomy, 37th edition, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, Wiley.
CR  - 3. BANWELL HA, MACKINTOSH S; THEWLIS D, (2014). Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus: a systematic review. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 7:23
CR  - 4. YALÇIN E, KURTARAN A, AKYÜZ M, (2008). Pes Planus: Tanısı, Etiyolojisi ve Tedavisi, Türkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci; 28: 743-753
CR  - 5. COTE KP, BRUNET II ME, GANSNEDER BM, SHULTZ SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. Journal of Athletic Training. 2005; 40(1):4146. PMCID: PMC1088344
CR  - 6. CHRİSTOVÃO TCL, NETO HP, GRECCO LAC, FERREİRA LAB, FRANCO DE MOURA RC, ELİEGE DE SOUZA M, et al. Effect of different insoles on postural balance: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2013; 25(10):1353–6. doi: 10.1589/ jpts.25.1353
CR  - 7. WOO MT, DAVİDS K, LİUKKONEN J, JAAKKOLA T, CHOW JY. Effects of textured compression socks on postural control in physically active elderly individuals. Procedia Engineering. 2014; 72:162–7. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.028
CR  - 8. KAVOUNOUDİAS A, ROLL R, ROLL J-P. The plantar sole is a “dynamometric map” for human balance control. Neuro Report. 1998; 9(14):3247–52. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199810050-00021
CR  - 9. SPAHN G, SCHİELE R, HELL AK, et al. The prevalence of pain and deformities in the feet of adolescents. Results of a cross-sectional study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 389-396
CR  - 10. UZUNCA K, TAŞTEKİN N, BİRTANE M. Erişkin tip pes planusta ağrı ve dizabilitenin radyografik ve pedobarografik parametreler ile ilişkisi. Romatizma Dergisi 2006; 21: 91- 95.
CR  - 11. AKBARİ M, MOHAMMADİ M, SAEEDİ H. [Effects of rigid and soft foot orthoses on dynamic balance in females with flatfoot (Persian)]. Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran. 2007; 21(2):91-7.
CR  - 12. ALİ ME, MOHAMED MS. [Dynamic postural balance in subjects with and without flat foot (Persian)]. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy. 2011; 16(1):7-11.
CR  - 13. TAKATA Y, MATSUOKA S, OKUMURA N, IWAMOTO K, TAKAHASHİ M, UCHİYAMA E. Standing balance on the ground: The influence of flat feet and insoles. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2013; 25(12):1519–21. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1519
CR  - 14. TSAİ LC, YU B, MERCER VS, Gross MT. Comparison of different structural foot types for measures of standing postural control. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2006; 36(12):942–53. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2336
CR  - 15. ROME K, BROWN CL. Randomized clinical trial into the impact of rigid foot orthoses on balance parameters in excessively pronated feet. Clinical Rehabilitation. 2004; 18(6):624–30. doi: 10.1191/0269215504cr767oa
CR  - 16. MORRİSON SC, DURWARD BR, Watt GF, DONALDSON MDCA. Literature review evaluating the role of the navicular in the clinical and scientific examination of the foot. Br J Pod. 2004;7(4):110-114.
CR  - 17. C. A. B. de Lira, R. L. Vancini, F. C. Minozzo, B. S. Sousa, J. P. Dubas, M. S. Andrade, L. L. Steinberg, A. C. da Silva, Relationship between aerobic and anaerobic parameters and functional classification in wheelchair basketball players, Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010: 20, p:638–643.
CR  - 18. SAFRİT MJ, WOOD TM. Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science. 3th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995.
CR  - 19. KOTHARİ A, DİXON P, STEBBİNS J, ZAVATSKY A, Theologis T. The relationship between quality of life and foot function in children with flexible flatfeet. Gait Posture. 2015;41(3):786-90.
CR  - 20. PAİK-LİNG H, CHRİS L. Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2017; 65: 238-245.
CR  - 21. BÜYÜKTRAN Ö., BÜYÜKTURAN B., KARARTI C., Sağlıklı Genç Yetişkinlerde Pes Planus ile Ağrı, Hipermobilite ve Denge Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi, F.Ü.Sağ.Bil.Tıp.Derg. 2017; 31 (1): 33 – 37.
CR  - 22. HARRİSON P.L.  , LİTTLEWOOD C., Relationship between pes planus foot type and postural stability, Indian Jouanl of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy. July - Sept. 2010,  VOL 4 NO 3.
UR  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhpr/article/586479
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/834739
ER  -