TY  - JOUR
T1  - Çevresel Gerontoloji Bağlamında ‘Yerinde Yaşlanma’nın Temel Belirleyicileri ve Aktif Yaşlanma Süreciyle İlişkisi
TT  - Basic Determinants of ‘Aging in Place’ in the Context of Environmental Gerontology and Its Correlation with the Process of Active Aging
AU  - Çapcıoğlu, İhsan
AU  - Alpay, Ahmed Hamza
PY  - 2019
DA  - September
DO  - 10.15869/itobiad.614239
JF  - İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi
JO  - itobiad
PB  - Mustafa Süleyman ÖZCAN
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 2147-1185
SP  - 1949
EP  - 1966
VL  - 8
IS  - 3
LA  - tr
AB  - 'Yerinde Yaşlanma'kavramı, genellikle, yaşlanırken evde kalabilmek için ideal olan politikayıifade etmek için kullanılır. Yerinde yaşlanmanın felsefesi, evde yaşam ortamınınsürekliliğini, toplumda bağımsızlığın korunmasını ve sosyal içermeyikapsamaktadır. Çevresel gerontoloji alanında çalışan bilim insanları, bireylerinyaşlandıkça, yaşadıkları mekânın fiziksel ve sosyal ortamına daha fazlabağlandıklarını iddia etmektedir. Söz konusuçevresel bağlam ile kişisel kimlik arasındaki etkileşimin yansımaları, çeşitlisosyal, psikolojik ve fiziksel konular bağlamında gözlemlenebilmektedir. Sağlık ve sosyal bakım maliyetlerini sınırlandırmayayönelik finansal zorunluluklar tarafından bakımevinde kalmayayönlendirilmelerine rağmen, yaşlı insanlar da, genellikle, yerinde yaşlanmayıtercih etmektedir. Yaşadığı çevredeki sivil faaliyetlere katılım, yaşlılarınsosyal ilişkilerini sürdürmelerini, mahalle etkinliklerine ve politikalarınakatılmaya devam etmelerini sağlayarak, yerinde yaşlanmanın önemli birbelirleyicisi olmaktadır. Bu çerçevede, makalemizde, öncelikle, çevreselgerontoloji literatüründeki kuramsal tartışma ve bulgulardan hareketle “yerindeyaşlanma” olgusunun temel belirleyicileri üzerinde durulacaktır. Makalemizinikinci kısmında ise, yerinde yaşlanma olgusunun aktif yaşlanma süreciyleilişkisi tartışılacak ve sosyal etkileri değerlendirilecektir.
KW  - Yerinde Yaşlanma
KW  - Çevresel Gerontoloji
KW  - Mekân
KW  - Sosyal Bağlılık
KW  - Aktif Yaşlanma.
N2  - The concept ‘aging in place’ is often used to denotethe ideal policy of being able to remain at home while aging. The philosophy of aging inplace involves the continuity of the home life environment, preservation ofindependence in society and social inclusion. Scientistsworking in the field of environmental gerontology claim that as individuals getolder, they become more connected to the physical and social environment of thespace they live in. Reflections of the interaction between the environmentalcontext in question and the personal identity can be observed in the context ofvarious social, psychological and physical issues. Elderly people generally prefer aging in place, although they are directed to stay in nursing homes by financial obligationsaiming to limit both healthcare and social care costs. Participation in civicactivities in the surrounding area continues to be an important determinant of agingin place, enabling theelderly to maintain their social relations and continue to participate inneighborhood activities and policies. Inthis context, our article will primarily focus on the main determinants of thephenomenon of “aging in place” on the basis of theoretical discussions andfindings in the environmental gerontology literature. In the second part of thearticle, the correlation between the phenomenon of aging in place and active aging will be discussed and itssocial effects will be evaluated.
CR  - Alders, P., & Schut, F. (2019). Trends in ageing and ageing-in-place and the future market for institutional care: Scenarios and policy implications. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 14(1), 82-100.
CR  - Alidoust, S., Bosman, C., & Holden, G. (2019). Planning for healthy ageing: How the use of third places contributes to the social health of older populations. Ageing and Society, 39(7), 1459-1484.
CR  - Antonietti, A., Balconi, M., Catellani, P., & Marchetti, A. (2014). Empowering Skills for an Active Ageing and Healthy Living. In C. Grassi, P. A. Marsan, & G. Riva (eds.), Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 157-171.
CR  - Barrett, P., Hale, B., & Gauld, R. (2012). Social inclusion through ageing-in-place with care? Ageing and Society, 32(3), 361-378.
CR  - Dahlberg, L. (2019). Ageing in a changing place: A qualitative study of neighbourhood exclusion. Ageing and Society, 1-19.
CR  - Dupuis-Blanchard, S.,& Gould, O. (2018). Nursing Homes Without Walls for Aging in Place. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne Du Vieillissement, 37(4), 442-449.
CR  - Gorczyca, K.,& Grabinski, T. (2018). Ageing in place: Residential satisfaction in Polish housing-estate communities. Ageing and Society, 38(12), 2410-2434.
CR  - Grassi, C., Marsan, P. A., & Riva, G. (2014). Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
CR  - Hillcoat-Nalletamby, S.,& Ogg, J. (2014). Moving beyond ‘ageing in place’: Older people's dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing and Society, 34(10), 1771-1796.
CR  - Johansson, K., Josephsson, S., & Lilja, M. (2009). Creating possibilities for action in the presence of environmental barriers in the process of ‘ageing in place’. Ageing and Society, 29(1), 49-70.
CR  - Peace, S., Holland, C., & Kellaher, L. (2011). ‘Option recognition’ in later life: Variations in ageing in place. Ageing and Society, 31(5), 734-757.
CR  - Ricciardi, W., Specchia M. L., & Marino, M. (2014). Health of the Elderlies and Healthy Ageing: A Challenge for Europe. In C. Grassi, P. A. Marsan, & G. Riva (eds.), Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 1-9.
CR  - Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., Villani, D., Cipresso, P., Repetto, C., Serino, S., Triberti, S., Brivio, E., Galimberti, C,, & Graffigna, G. (2014). Positive Technology for Healthy Living and Active Ageing. In C. Grassi, P. A. Marsan, & G. Riva (eds.), Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 44-56.
CR  - Rossi, G., Boccacin, L., Bramanti, D., & Meda, S. G. (2014). Active Ageing: Intergenerational Relationships and Social Generativity. In C. Grassi, P. A. Marsan, & G. Riva (eds.), Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 57-68.
CR  - Rossini, P. M. & Marra, C. (2014). Demographic Changes and the Challenge for a Healthy Ageing. In C. Grassi, P. A. Marsan, & G. Riva (eds.), Active Ageing and Healthy Living : A Human Centered Approach in Research and Innovation As Source of Quality of Life. Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press, 23-31.
CR  - Scharlach, A. E. & Moore, K. D. (2016). Aging in Place. In V. L. Bengtson, R. A.  Settersten, B. K. Kennedy, N. Morrow-Howell, & J. Smith (eds.), Handbook of Theories of Aging, Third Edition (Vol. Third edition). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 239-249.
CR  - Van Dijk, H., Cramm, J., Van Exel, J., & Nieboer, A. (2015). The ideal neighbourhood for ageing in place as perceived by frail and non-frail community-dwelling older people. Ageing and Society, 35(8), 1771-1795.
CR  - Wadu Mesthrige, J.,& Cheung, S. (2019). Critical evaluation of ‘ageing in place’ in redeveloped public rental housing estates in Hong Kong. Ageing and Society, 1-34.
CR  - Yung, E. H. K., Conejos, S., & Chan, E. H. W. (2016). Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities, 52 (2016), 114–122.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.614239
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/818825
ER  -