TY  - JOUR
T1  - Validity and Reliability of the “Gamification Applications in Education” Scale
TT  - Eğitimde Oyunlaştırma Uygulamaları” Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
AU  - Özdamlı, Fezile
AU  - Kocakoyun Aydoğan, Şenay
PY  - 2019
DA  - September
DO  - 10.22559/folklor.927
JF  - Folklor/Edebiyat
JO  - folk/ed
PB  - Uluslararası Kıbrıs Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1300-7491
SP  - 64
EP  - 76
VL  - 25
IS  - 97
LA  - en
AB  - With the growth of suitable applications for the gamification approach, it has becoming increasingly usedin education. Although it is known that there are scales that have been developed depending on gamedependency, it is necessary to determine the opinions of students about this approach in order to increasethe information about the students' approach to gamification and its educational use. When the literature isexamined, it is found that, although it is mentioned that gamification improves the motivation and interestlevels of the students towards lectures, no scale has been developed for this purpose. The aim of thisresearch is to develop a scale to determine the opinions of the students on an educational process in whichthe learning is provided by using a gamification application. As a result of the literature review made withinthe scope of this overall aim, characteristics which should be suitable for the gamification applications ineducation were determined. Stratified random sampling is a process in which certain sub groups are selectedfor the sample in the same proportion as they exist in the population. Data for the tests of reliability andvalidity were obtained from a sample of 360 students. As a result of Varimax analysis, it has beendetermined that it is only has one factor. The internal consistency reliability of the scale is calculated as.986. Based on this analysis, it has been determined that the scale for determining the opinions of studentsduring the gamification process is reliable.
KW  - Gamification
KW  - application
KW  - scale
KW  - validity
KW  - reliability
N2  - eknolojik yeniliklerle geliştirilen oyunlaştırma, eğitim sistemlerini geliştirmek ve öğrencileri motive etmekiçin kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Öğrencileri motive etmek için önemli bir potansiyele sahip olanoyunlaştırma öğrenciler için çok cazip hale gelmiştir. Eğitsel oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının artması ileçalışmaların sayısı da artış göstermektedir. Oyun bağımlılığına bağlı olarak geliştirilen ölçeklerin olduğubilinmesine rağmen, öğrencilerin oyunlaştırma yaklaşımı ve eğitimsel kullanımı hakkındaki bilgileriarttırmak için öğrencilerin bu yaklaşımla ilgili görüşlerini belirlemek gerekmektedir. Literatürincelendiğinde, oyunlaştırmanın öğrencilerin derslere yönelik motivasyon ve ilgi düzeylerini geliştirdiğisöylense de, literatürde bu amaçla bir ölçek geliştirilmediği görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı,öğrencilerin oyunlaştırma uygulaması kullanarak öğrenim gördükleri bir eğitim süreci hakkındakigörüşlerini belirlemek için uygun bir ölçek geliştirmektir. Bu amaç kapsamında yapılan literatür taramasısonucunda eğitimde oyunlaştırma uygulamaları için olması gereken özellikler belirlenmiştir. Oyunlaştırmauygulamalarının eğitsel amaçlı kullanımına yönelik geliştirilmesi amaçlanan ölçek için 38 ifadelik maddehavuzu oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi, Atatürk EğitimFakültesinde öğrenim gören ve oyunlaştırma uygulamalarını eğitsel amaçlı kullanan öğrencileroluşturmaktadır. Güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik testleri için veriler 360 öğrenciden elde edilmiştir. Geri dönüşoranı % 97.2 olan uygulamadan sonra 350 kullanılabilir veri elde edilmiştir. Varimax analizi sonucunda,sadece bir faktörün olduğu belirlenmiştir.Ölçeğe eklenecek maddeler seçilirken madde toplam korelasyonkatsayısının .30’dan yüksek olmasına dikkat edilmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık güvenilirliği .986 olarakhesaplanmıştır. Bu analize dayanarak, oyunlaştırma sürecinde öğrencilerin görüşlerini belirleme ölçeğiningüvenilir olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin eğitimde oyunlaştırma uygulamalarının kullanımına yönelikgörüşlerini belirleme amaçlı ölçek kullanılabilir.
CR  - 5mid, 2016. Retrived on 08 February 2017 from: http://5mid.com/lol/league-of-legends-100-milyon-oyuncusayisina-ulasti/
Akın, A., Usta, F., Başa, E., & Özçelik, B. (2016). Oyun bağımlılığı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması, geçerlik ve
güvenirlik çalışması. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, (1), 223-232.
CR  - Alpar, R. (2010), Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik- Güvenirlik, Birinci Baskı,
Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
CR  - Aristolog, Retrived 4 May 2017 from: www.aristolog.com
CR  - Aytekin, B. A. (2016). Bilgisayar Destekli Eğitimde Teknolojik Kolaylaştırıcı Olarak Facebook Platformu ve
Avantajları. International Multilingual Academic Journal, 1(1).
CR  - Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., Sommer, M., et al. (2014).
Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7),
694–697.
CR  - Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006), Veri Analizi El Kitabı, 6. Baskı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
CR  - Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social
comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66–77.
CR  - Dalpiaz, F., Snijders, R., Brinkkemper, S., Hosseini, M., Shahri, A., & Ali, R. (2017). Engaging the Crowd of
Stakeholders in Requirements Engineering via Gamification. In Gamification (pp. 123-135). Springer
International Publishing.
CR  - de-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing
gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82–91.
CR  - Denny, P. (2013). The effect of virtual achievements on student engagement. In Proceedings of CHI 2013:
Changing perspectives, Paris, France, April 27–May 2, 2013 (pp. 763–772).
CR  - Deterding, S., Bjork, S., Nacke, L. E., Dixon, D., & Lawley, E. (2013). Designing Gamification: Creating gameful
and playful experiences. In CHI 2013 Extended Abstracts (pp. 3263e3266). New York: ACM Press
CR  - Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., Martínez-Herráiz, J.-J.
(2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes, Computers & Education,
63, pp. 380--392.
CR  - Durualp, E., & Aral RAL, N . ( 2011). Oyun temelli sosyal beceri eğitimi. Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık
CR  - Farzan et al., (2008a). R. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. Dugan When the
experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the users Symposium on Persuasive Technology,
Aberdeen, Scotland, April, 2008 (2008).
CR  - Farzan et al., (2008b). R. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. Dugan Results from
deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise Proceedings of the twenty-sixth
annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008
(2008), pp. 563–572.
CR  - Farzan, R., & Brusilovsky, P. (2011). Encouraging user participation in a course recommender system: An impact
on user behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 276–284.
CR  - Filsecker, M., & Hickey, D. T. (2014). A multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary
students’ motivation, engagement and learning in an educational game. Computers & Education, 75, 136–
148.
CR  - Fraenkel, R. J. & Wallen, E. N. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGrawHill.
Guler, C., & Guler, E. (2015). Çevrimiçi Öğrenme Ortamlarında Oyunlaştırma: Rozet Kullanımı. Journal of
Research in Education and Teaching. 4(3). 125-130.
CR  - Gürbüztürk, O. & Şad, S. N. (2010). Turkish parental involvement scale: Validity and reliability studies. Procedia
Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2: 487-491.
CR  - Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2013). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in
TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Proceedings of learning and teaching in computing and
engineering (LaTiCE) conference, Macau, March 21–24, 2013 (pp. 47–54).
CR  - Hamari, J. (2013). Transforming Homo economicus into Homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a
utilitarian peer-to-peer trading service. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 236–245.
CR  - Hamari, J. (2015). Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers
in Human Behavior.
CR  - Heilbrunn, B., Herzig, P., & Schill, A. (2017). Gamification Analytics—Methods and Tools for Monitoring and
Adapting Gamification Designs. In Gamification (pp. 31-47). Springer International Publishing.
CR  - Johnson, B. & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the constructivist
learning environment survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7: 65-80.
CR  - Kiryakova, G., Angelova, N., & Yordanova, L. (2014). Gamification in education. Proceedings of 9th International
Balkan Education and Science Conference.
CR  - Kline, P. (1994), An Easy Guide to Factor Analysis, London: Routledge.
CR  - Küçük, S., & Şişman, B. (2017). Birebir Robotik Öğretiminde Öğreticilerin Deneyimleri. İlköğretim Online, 16(1).
ISO 690
CR  - Lee, J. & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly,
15(2).
CR  - Lee, J. J., Ceyhan, P., Jordan-Cooley, W., & Sung, W. (2013). GREENIFY: A real-world action game for climate
change education. Simulation & Gaming, 1046878112470539.
CR  - Lounis, S., Pramatari, K., & Theotokis, A. (2014). Gamification is all about fun: The role of incentive type and
community collaboration.
CR  - Lyons, S . (December 10, 2012). “League of Legends has 32 million monthly active players”. Retrieved February
28, 2017 from: http://www.destructoid.com/league-of-legends-has-32-millionmonthly-active-players236618.phtml
Markets and Markets. (2016). Gamification market by solution (consumer driven and enterprise driven),
applications (sales and marketing), deployment type (On-Premises and cloud), user type (large enterprise,
SMBs), industry and region - global forecast to 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2016, from http://www.
marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/gamification-market-991.html.
CR  - Meske, C., Brockmann, T., Wilms, K., & Stieglitz, S. (2017). Social Collaboration and Gamification.
In Gamification (pp. 93-109). Springer International Publishing.
CR  - Mora, A., Riera, D., Gonzalez, C., & Arnedo-Moreno, J. (2015, September). A literature review of gamification
design frameworks. In Games and virtual worlds for serious applications (VS-Games), 2015 7th
international conference on (pp. 1e8). IEEE.
CR  - Morschheuser, B., Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2016). Gamification in crowdsourcing: A review. In Proceedings of
the 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Hawaii, USA, January
5-8, 2016.
CR  - Morschheuser, B., Werder, K., Hamari, J., & Abe, J. (2017). How to gamify? A method for designing gamification.
In Proceedings of the 50th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (hicss), Hawaii,
USA, January 4-7, 2017.
CR  - Nacke, L. E., & Deterding, S. (2017). The maturing of gamification research.
CR  - Ozdamli, F. (2009). A cultural adaptation study of multimedia course materials forum to Turkish. World Journal
on Educational Technology, 1(1). Retrieved July 26, 2010, from http://www.world-educationcenter.org/index.php/wjet/article/view/123
CR  - See, L. J. (1951). Cronbach: Coefficient alhpa and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297-334.
CR  - Sharma S, (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques, John Wiley Sonc Inc, New York, 116.
CR  - Sheldon, L. (2011). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston:Cengage Learning.
Siemon, D., & Eckardt, L. (2017). Gamification of Teaching in Higher Education. In Gamification (pp. 153-164).
Springer International Publishing.
CR  - Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform.
Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.
CR  - Thiel, S. K., & Fröhlich, P. (2017). Gamification as Motivation to Engage in Location-Based Public Participation?.
In Progress in Location-Based Services 2016 (pp. 399-421). Springer International Publishing.
CR  - Thom, J., Millen, D., & DiMicco, J. (2012). Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. In Proceedings of
the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1067-1070). ACM
CR  - Tsai, C. C. & Liu, S. Y. (2005). Developing a multi-dimensional instrument for assessing students’ epistemological
views toward science, International Journal of Science Education, 27(13): 1621-1638.
CR  - Tuan, H. L., Chang, H. P., Wang, K. H. & Treagust, D. F. (2000). The development of an Instrument for assessing
students’ perceptions of teachers’ knowledge, International Journal of Science Education, 22(4): 385-
398.
CR  - Tudof, 2016. www.tudof.org, 04.05.2016.
CR  - van Roy, R., & Zaman, B. (2017). Autonomously Motivating Gamification in Education: an Explorative Study.
World Government Summit, 2016. Gamification and the Future of Education. Retrived 8 February 2017 from:
https://worldgovernmentsummit.org/api/publications/document?id=2b0d6ac4-e97c-6578-b2f8-
ff0000a7ddb6
CR  - Xu, F., Buhalis, D., & Weber, J. (2017). Serious games and the gamification of tourism. Tourism Management, 60,
244-256.
CR  - Yasar, S., & Anagün,S.S. (2009). Reliability and Validity Studies of the Science and Technology Course Scientific
Attitude Scale. Turkish Science Education 6(2), 43-54.
CR  - Yıldırım, İ., & Demir, S. (2016). Students’ Views About Gamification Based Curriculum for the Lesson of
“Teaching Principles and Methods”. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional
Studies, 6(11).
UR  - https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.927
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/804851
ER  -