TY  - JOUR
T1  - Mesane Kanserinde Radikal Sistektomi Operasyonunun Önemi ve Takip Döneminde Karşılaşılan Komplikasyonlar: Tek Merkez Deneyimi
TT  - Importance of Radical Cystectomy Operation in Bladder Cancer and Complications Encountered During Follow-up: Single Center Experience
AU  - Alma, Ergün
AU  - Altunkol, Adem
AU  - Erçil, Hakan
AU  - Gürlen, Güçlü
AU  - Şener, Nevzat Can
AU  - Gürbüz, Zafer Gökhan
PY  - 2020
DA  - April
Y2  - 2020
DO  - 10.35440/hutfd.640231
JF  - Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi
PB  - Harran Üniversitesi
WT  - DergiPark
SN  - 1304-9623
SP  - 33
EP  - 36
VL  - 17
IS  - 1
LA  - tr
AB  - Amaç: Kliniğimizde yapılan radikal sistektomi operasyonlarının onkolojik ve fonksiyonel sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi.Materyal ve metod: Eylül 2016 ve Haziran 2019 tarihleri arasında gerçekleştirilen 42 sistektomi hastasının kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Demografikler, patolojik inceleme sonuçları, diversiyon yöntemleri, hospitalizasyon süreleri, ortalama takip süresi ve oluşan komplikasyonlar değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Çalışmamız yaş ortalaması 65.1±8.8 yıl olan 4 kadın ve 38 erkek hasta olmak üzere toplam 42 hastadan oluşmaktaydı. Ortalama hastanede yatış süreleri 18.7±8.3 gün ve ortalama takip süresi 10.8±6.1 ay idi. 15 hasta(%35.7) sistektomi öncesi neoadjuvan kemoterapi almıştı. Sistektomi materyallerinin patolojik değerlendirmesinde 19 pT1 ve 19 pT2, 6 pT0, 2 pT4 evre saptandı. En sık yapılan diversiyon ileal loop idi. Takip periyodunda 26 (%61.9) hastada değişik derecelerde komplikasyon izlendi. Sonuç: Radikal sistektomi operasyonu morbiditesi yüksek ve bazen mortal olabilen bir cerrahi olmasına rağmen onkolojik sonuçları ile beraber değerlendirildiğinde deneyimli merkezlerde başarı ile uygulanabilen bir cerrahi prosedürdür.
KW  - Sistektomi
KW  - diversiyon
KW  - ileal loop
N2  - Background: To evaluate the oncological and functional results of radical cystectomy operations performed in our clinic.Materials and Methods: The records of 42 cystectomy patients performed between September 2016 and June 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, pathological examination results, diversion methods, hospitalization time, mean follow-up and complications were evaluated.Results: Our study consisted of 42 patients (4 female and 38 male) with a mean age of 65.1 ± 8.8 years. The mean hospital stay was 18.7 ± 8.3 days and the mean follow-up was 10.8 ± 6.1 months. Fifteen patients (35.7%) had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before cystectomy. Pathologic evaluation of cystectomy materials revealed 19 pT1 and 19 pT2, 6 pT0, 2 pT4 stages. The most common diversion was ileal loop. During the follow-up period, 26 (61.9%) patients had varying degrees of complication.Conclusions: Radical cystectomy is a surgical procedure that can be performed successfully in experienced centers when evaluated with its oncologic results, although it is a highly morbid and sometimes mortal surgery.
CR  - 1-	J.A. Witjes, M. Bruins, R. Cathomas, E. Compérat, N.C. Cowan, G. Gakis, et al. EAU Oncology Guidelines: Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer.https://uroweb.org/ guideline/ Muscle-invasive and Metastatic Bladder Cancer 2019.2-	Michel J, Goel AN, Golla V, Lenis AT, Johnson DC, Chamie K et al. Predicting Short-Term Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy Based on Frailty. Urology. 2019 Jul 12. pii: S0090-4295(19)30610-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.057. 3-	Altan M, Özdemir B, Çıtamak B, Akdoğan B, Özen H. Radikal Sistektomi Cerrahisinin Kalitesi Nasıl Ölçülebilir? Üroonkoloji Bülteni 2014;13:70-74.4-	Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, Haro I, Mansson W, Mills RD et al. World Health Organization (WHO) Consensus Conference on Bladder Cancer. Urology. 2007 ;69(1):17-49.5-	Rangarajan K, Somani BK. Trends in quality of life reporting for radical cystectomy and urinary diversion over the last four decades: A systematic review of the literature. Arab J Urol. 2019;17(3):181-194.6-	Audenet F, Sfakianos JP. Evidence of Atypical Recurrences After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Bladder Cancer. 2017;3(4):231-6.7-	Lobo N, Mount C, Omar K, Nair R, Thurairaja R, Khan MS. Landmarks in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(9):565-574.8-	Batur AF, Sözen S. Yüksek Riskli Kasa İnvaze Olmayan Mesane Kanserinde Erken Sistektomi mi yoksa Mesane Koruyucu Tedavi mi Tercih edelim? Üroonkoloji Bülteni 2014;13:93-8.9-	Kulkarni GS, Hakenberg OW, Gschwend JE, Thalmann G, Kassouf W, Kamat A et al . An updated critical analysis of the treatment strategy for mewly diagnosed high-grade T1(previously T1G3) bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:60-70.10-	Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, Groshen S, Feng AC, Boyd S et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(3):666-75.11-	Yin M, Joshi M, Meijer RP, Glantz M, Holder S, Harvey HA et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Two-Step Meta-Analysis. Oncologist. 2016;21(6):708-15. 12-	Griffiths G, Hall R, Sylvester R, Raghavan D, Parmar MK. International phase III trial assessing neoadjuvant cisplatin, methotrexate and vinblastine chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: long-term results of the BA06 30894 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(16):2171-7. 13-	Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):11-23.14-	Kiss B, Burkhard FC, Thalmann GN. Open radical cystectomy: still the gold standard for muscle invasive bladder cancer. World J Urol. 2016;34(1):33-9.15-	McMullen CK, Kwan ML, Colwell JC, Munneke JR, Davis JV, Firemark A et al. Recovering from Cystectomy: Patient Perspectives. Bladder Cancer. 2019;5(1):51-61.16-	Son SK, Lee NR, Kang SH, Lee SH. Safety and Effectiveness of  Robot-Assisted Versus Open Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27(11):1109-20.17-	Davis RB, Farber NJ, Tabakin AL, Kim IY, Elsamra SE. Open versus robotic cystectomy: Comparison of outcomes. Investig Clin Urol. 2016;57 (1):36-43.18-	Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, Silberstein J, Keren Paz GE, Donat SM et al. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1042-50.19-	Bansal SS, Dogra T, Smith PW, Amran M, Auluck I, Bhambra M et al. Cost analysis of open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2018;121(3):437-44.
UR  - https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.640231
L1  - https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1075124
ER  -