@article{article_673295, title={Ureteral Injury Increases with Ureteral Wall Thickness During the Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy of Impacted Stones}, journal={Endoüroloji Bülteni}, volume={12}, pages={9–14}, year={2020}, author={Boz, Mustafa and Güzelburç, Vahit and Çalık, Gökhan and Soytaş, Mustafa and Kaçtan, Çağrı and Güven, Selçuk}, keywords={Üreter yaralanması,impakte taş,üreteroskopi}, abstract={<p> <span style="font-size:14px;">Aim: In this study, along with the patient and stone related features, we evaluated the possible relation of ureteral </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">wall thickness and ureteral injury with stone free rates in patients who had undergone ureteroscopy for ureteral </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">stones. </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">Material and Methods: 120 cases (71.7%, male) who underwent ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy between October </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">2014 and November 2015 was enrolled to this study. Pre-, intra- and postoperative patient characteristics, including </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">impacted stoneevaluation was done in all patients. Ureteral wall thickness was calculated at the stone site with the </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">help of CT images. Ureteral lesions were graded according to Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS). Hospitalization </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">time stone burden, stone clearance, and complications according to Clavien classification system were recorded. </span> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">Results: 38 patients among 120 patients had impacted ureteral stones. Vast majority of the stones were located in the lower ureter (%75.8). Mean ureteral wall thickness was 2.75±0.97 mm. A grade 1 lesion was seen in 64 (53.3%) and grade 2 lesion in 2 patients (1.7%). While there was weak relation between stone size and ureteral wall thickness (p=0.011), either location or hydronephrosis degree did not show relation with ureteral wall thickness. Ureteral lesions was increasing with ureteral wall thickening (p=0.044). Ureteral wall thickness was larger in impacted stone patients and PULS grade was higher as well. </span> </p> <p> </p> <p> <span style="font-size:14px;">Conclusion: Ureteral wall injuries may happen during ureteroscopic stone management which can be standardized and classified with PULS. Among the stone and patient related factors ureteral wall thickness and impacted stones had significant correlation with ureteral lesion. Considering these factors in the preoperative planning may increase the safety of the ureteroscopy process. </span> </p>}, number={1}, publisher={Endoüroloji Derneği}