Mimari Tasarımda WELL Bina Standardı ile Sağlıklı Bina Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 2, 149 - 165, 30.12.2025

Pelin Karaçar

Abstract

Dünya genelinde, günlük yaşam tarzlarında meydana gelen hızlı değişimlerle birlikte, inşa edilmiş çevre insan sağlığı ve refahı için önemli bir faktör haline gelmiştir. Fizyolojik ve psikolojik işlevler evrim boyunca doğaya bağımlı olsa da insan yaşamının yaklaşık %90'ı iç mekanlarda geçmektedir. Günümüzde, büyük ölçüde kentleşme nedeniyle insanlar doğadan kopmuştur. Doğadan kopukluk daha da belirginleştikçe, doğayla ilgili unsurların inşa edilmiş çevreye dahil edilmesine odaklanan daha fazla araştırma yürütülmektedir. Mimarlıkta, doğa ve insan arasında ilişki kurmayı amaçlayan insan sağlığını ve refahını destekleyen iyileştirici ortamlar yaratmada mimarlığın rolü son yıllarda büyük önem kazanmıştır Mimarlığın amaçları, insan sağlığını koruyan ve tasarımın teşvik ettiği sağlıklı uygulamalara yol açan uyarlanabilir tasarım çözümleri uygulamaktır. Sağlıklı bina, kullanıcıların refahı ve sağlığı ile ilgilidir. Sürdürülebilir bina, diğer sosyal ve ekonomik sorumlulukların yanı sıra yeşil bina ve sağlıklı bina kavramlarının bir parçasını içeren daha bütünseldir. Sağlıklı binaların temel amacı, kullanıcılarının fiziksel sağlığını, zihinsel refahını ve üretkenliğini destekleyen ortamlar sağlamaktır. Sağlıklı binaların odağı, kullanıcıların sağlığını ve refahını destekleyen kaliteli iç mekân ortamlarının tasarlanmasıdır. WELL Bina Standardı (WELL), inşa edilmiş ortamlardaki insanların sağlık ve refahını, refah ve inşa edilmiş çevre arasındaki bağlantıya odaklanan tüm bina türlerinin refahı için oluşturulmuş standartlardır. Bu standart, hava, su, beslenme, ışık, zindelik, konfor ve zihin olmak üzere yedi temel alan aracılığıyla insan sağlığını etkileyen özellikleri onaylayan performansa dayalı bir sistemdir. İnsanların yaşadığı ve çalıştığı inşa edilmiş çevre ile bu çevrelerin kullanıcılarının sağlığı veya refahı üzerindeki etkisini inceleyen tıbbi araştırmalara dayanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Mimari Tasarımda WELL Bina Standardı ile Sağlıklı Bina Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi ve araştırma kapsamında kullanıcılarına daha iyi sağlık koşulları ve refah sağlayan binalar yaratmanın önemini araştırmaktır.

Keywords

Mimarlık , WELL-Bina standardı , Refah , Biyofilik tasarım , Sağlıklı Bina.

Evaluation Of Healthy Buildings And Well Building Standards Within The Architectural Framework

Abstract

With rapid urbanization and changing lifestyles, the built environment has become a primary determinant of human health and well-being. As people now spend approximately 90% of their lives indoors, a significant disconnect from nature has emerged. This has heightened the focus on architecture's role in creating healing environments that actively support occupant health. While sustainable building encompasses broader environmental and social goals, healthy building specifically targets the physical, mental, and social well-being of users through high-quality indoor environmental design.
The WELL Building Standard (WELL) is a leading, performance-based certification system that translates medical research into actionable design criteria. It evaluates and certifies built environments based on their impact on human health across seven core concepts: Air, Water, Nourishment, Light, Fitness, Comfort, and Mind. Grounded in evidence linking design to health outcomes, WELL provides a structured framework for architects and designers.
This study aims to evaluate the key features of healthy buildings through the comprehensive lens of the WELL Standard within architectural design. It explores how WELL's criteria—from air quality and circadian lighting to biophilic integration and mental well-being support—can be systematically integrated into the design process. The research underscores the importance of moving beyond basic shelter to create spaces that proactively enhance occupant health, reduce absenteeism, and boost productivity and cognitive function. By adopting such human-centric standards, architecture can fulfill its fundamental responsibility to foster environments that heal, thrive, and significantly improve quality of life.

Keywords

Health , WELL-Building standards , Well-being , Biophilic design , Healty Building

Ethical Statement

THERE IS NO SITUATION REQUIRING AN ETHICS COMMITTEE DECISION

Supporting Institution

NONE

Thanks

NONE

References

• Bonnefoy, X. R., Annesi-Maesona, I., Aznar, L. M., Braubachi, M., Croxford, B., Davidson, M., Ezratty, V., Fredouille, J., Ganzalez-Gross, M., van Kamp, I., Maschke, C., Mesbah, M., Moisonnier, B., Monolbaev, K., Moore, R., Nicol, S., Niemann, H., Nygren, C., Ormandy, D., Röbbel, N., & Rudnai, P. (2004). Review of Evidence on Housing and Health. Fourth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health.
• Dorgan Associates. (1993). Productivity and Indoor Environmental Quality Study. National Management Institute.
• Fisk, W. J. (2000). Review of health and productivity gains from better IEQ. In Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2000, Helsinki, Finland (Vol. 4, pp. 22–34).
• Obrecht, T. P., Kunič, R., Jordan, S., & Dovjak, M. (2019). Comparison of health and well-being aspects in building certification schemes. Sustainability, 11(9), 2616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092616
• Harari, M., Waehler, C., & Rogers, J. (2005). An empirical investigation of a theoretically based measure of perceived wellness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(1), 93–103.
• Minucciani, V., & Saglar Onay, N. (2018). Evaluation of design approaches for well-being in interiors. Journal of Engineering and Architecture, 6(1), 112–122.
• Gillis, K., & Gatersleben, B. (2015). A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings, 5(3), 948–963. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings5030948
• Chairiyah, R. (2023). Biomimicry Architecture for Healthy Built Environment: A Review of Existing Literature. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1218, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012027.
• Liu, H., Xu, X., Tam, V. W. Y., & Mao, P. (2023). What is the “DNA” of healthy buildings? A critical review and future directions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 183, 113460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113460
• Rice, L. (2019). The nature and extent of healthy architecture: the current state of progress. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 13(2), 244–259. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2018-0005
• Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The biophilia hypothesis. Island Press.
• Quesada-García, S.; Valero-Flores, P.; Lozano-Gómez, (2023). M. Towards a Healthy Architecture: A New Paradigm in the Design and Construction of Buildings. Buildings 2023, 13, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082001.
• Al Alwan H,and Saleh E. (2020). Similarities and differences between green, sustainable and healthy building concepts. Proceedings of the 1st international multi-disciplinary conference theme: sustainable development and smart planning. https:// doi.org/10.4108/eai.28-6-2020.2297889.
• Jarden, A., & Roache, A. (2023). What is wellbeing? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20065006
• Watson, K. J. (2018). Establishing psychological wellbeing metrics for the built environment. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 39(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624418754497
• Joshi, S. M. (2008). The sick building syndrome. Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 12(2), 61–64. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5278.43262
• Lin, Y., Yuan, X., Yang, W., Hao, X., & Li, C. (2022). A review on research and development of healthy building in China. Buildings, 12(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030376
• Loftness, V., Hakkinen, B., Adan, O., & Nevalainen, A. (2007). Elements that contribute to healthy building design. Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(6), 965–970. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8988
• Mao, P., Qi, J., Tan, Y., & Li, J. (2017). An examination of factors affecting healthy building: an empirical study in east China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.165
• WELL. (2018). The WELL Building Standard (v2). International WELL Building Institute. Delos Living LLC. Accessed 20.08.2025, https://v2.wellcertified.com/en.
• Chowdhury, S., Noguchi, M., & Doloi, H. (2023). Methodological approach of environmental experience design to enhancing occupants’ well-being. Buildings, 13(2), 542. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13020542
• Santiago, Q., Pablo, V., & Maria, L. (2023). Towards a healthy architecture: A new paradigm in the design and construction of buildings. Buildings, 1-21.
• Clegg, F., Sears, M., Friesen, M., Scarato, T., & Russel, C. (2020). Building science and radiofrequency radiation: What makes smart and healthy buildings. Building and Environment, 1-15.
• Darko, A., Zhang, C., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Drivers for green building: A review of empirical studies. Habitat International, 60, 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.12.007
• Xie, H., Clements-Croome, D., & Wang, Q. (2017). Move beyond green building: a focus on healthy, comfortable, sustainable and aesthetical architecture. Intelligent Buildings International, 9(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2016.1139536
• Allen, J., & Macomber, J. (2020). Healthy Buildings: How Indoor Spaces Drive Performance and Productivity. Harvard University Press.
• Dauda, J. A. (2024). Exploration of Healthy Building Concepts Within Green and Sustainable Building Practises, SEED 2024 Conference, Leeds Beckett University, UK, 1-11. Rice, L., & Drain, M. (2020). The WELL Building Standard: A tool for advancing occupant health and well-being in the built environment. Journal of Green Building, 15(4), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.15.4.43
• Darwish, B. H., Rasmy, W. M., & Ghaly, M. (2022). Applying “well building standards” in interior design of administrative buildings. Journal of Art & Architecture Research Students, 3(5), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.47436/JAARS.2022.124889.1073
• Mak, M. Y. (2017). Beyond sustainability: Shift from buildings towards human. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual PRRES Conference, Sydney, New South Wales.
• Tan, C. Y. M., & Rahman, R. A. (2023). WELL Building: Key Design Features for Office Environments. Journal of Architectural Engineering,29(2), 04023011. https://doi.org/10.1061/JAEIED.AEENG-1544