Diversity and distribution of phytophagous and predatory mites on rosehip (Rosa canina L.) (Rosaceae) in Ankara, Turkey

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 83 - 87, 29.07.2020

Tuğba Erdoğan Sultan Cobanoglu

https://doi.org/10.47121/acarolstud.769238

Cited By: 1

Öz

The study was carried out to detect phytophagous and predatory mites on rosehip (Rosa canina L.) (Rosaceae) in Ankara, Turkey. The samples were collected monthly from Ayaş, Çubuk, Gölbaşı, Haymana, Kahramankazan and Kızılcahamam districts of Ankara province from March to November between 2012 and 2014. As a result, a total of 12 mite species were identified namely; Amphitetranychus viennensis (Zacher), Bryobia kissophila Eyndhoven, Eotetranychus populi (Koch), Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae), Cenopalpus pulcher (Canestrini and Fanzago) (Acari: Tenuipalpidae), Tarsonemus smithi Ewing (Acari: Tarsonemidae) as phytophagous mites, and Euseius finlandicus (Oudemans), Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans), Paraseiulus triporus (Chant and Yoshida-Shaul), Typhlodromus (Anthoseius) bagdasarjani Wainstein and Arutunjan, T. (A.) psyllakisi (Swirski and Ragusa) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) and Zetzellia mali (Ewing) (Acari: Stigmaeidae) as predatory mites. Tetranychus urticae and K. aberrans are the most common phytophagous and predatory mites, respectively. Tarsonemus smithi is a new record for the Turkish fauna.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Acari, mites, Phytoseiidae, Rosaceae, rosehip, Turkey

Destekleyen Kurum

University of Ankara, the Coordination of Scientific Research Projects (Ankara Üniversitesi - Bilimsel Araştırma ve Projeleri Koordinatörlüğü)

Proje Numarası

BAP-12B4347011

Teşekkür

This manuscript is a part of the PhD thesis of T. Erdoğan. We would like to express our sincere gratitude to Ankara University for their financial support to this work.

Kaynakça

• 5- Bayram, Ş., Ülgentürk, S. ve Toros, S. 1998. Ankara ilinde kuşburnu (Rosa spp.)’ da gal yapan böcekler ve bunların parazitoidleri üzeride araştırmalar, Türk. Entomol. Derg., 22(4): 259-268.
• 6- Chant, D.A. and McMurtry, J.A. 1994. A review of the subfamilies Phytoseiinae and Trophlodrominae (Acari: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 20: 223–310.
• 7- Çobanoğlu, S. and Bayram, S. 1999. Mite (Acari) species associated with cultivated and wild rose plants in Camlidere, Turkey. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 135: 245-248.
• 8- Çobanoğlu, S. 2004. Phytoseiid mites (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) of Thrace, Turkey. Israel Journal of Entomology, 34: 83-107.
• 9- Çobanoğlu, S., Ueckermann E.A. and Sağlam, H.D. 2016. The Tenuipalpidae of Turkey, with a key to species (Acari: Trombidiformes), Zootaxa 4097 (2): 151–186.
• 10- Demite, P.R., McMurtry, J.A. & Moraes, G.J. de. 2014. Phytoseiidae Database: a website for taxonomic and distributional information on phytoseiid mites (Acari). Zootaxa, 3795 (5): 571–577.
• 11- Dönel, G. and Doğan, S. 2013. The first record of a predator mite in kelkit valley: Zetzellia mali (Ewing) (Acari:Stigmaeidae). Fen bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. Cilt:6, Sayı:2, 157-163.
• 12- Düzgüneş, Z. 1963. Türkiye’de yeni bulunan akarlar. Türkiye Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 3(4): 237-246.
• 13- Düzgüneş, Z. 1965. Türkiye’de bitkilerde zarar veren Tenuipalpidae Sayed familyası türleri üzerine incelemeler Ank. Üni. Ziraat Fakültesi Yıllıgı Fasikül 3, 120–148.
• 14- Faraji, F., Çobanoğlu S. and Çakmak, I. 2011. A Checklist and a Key For The Phytoseiidae Species of Turkey (Acari: Mesostigmata),  International Journal of Acarology 37(sup1):221-243.
• 15- Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. 1975. Mites injurious to Economic Plants. Univ. Calif. Press, 253–283.
• 16- Karaca, İ. 1956. Orta Anadolu ve Meyve Ağaçlarında Görülen Menşei Nebati ve Hayvani Önemli Urların Amili ve Morfolojileri Hakkında Araştırmalar. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 84, Çalışmalar:45, AnkaraÜniversitesi Basımevi, 134s.
• 17- Koç, K. & Ayyıldız, N. 1996a. Türkiye faunası için yeni iki Raphignathus Duges (Acari, Prostigmata, Raphignathidae) türü. Turk. J. Zool., 20 (supplement): 209-214.
• 18- Koç, K. & Ayyıldız, N. 1996b. Türkiye faunası için yeni iki keyletid (Acari, Prostigmata, Cheyletidae) türü. Turk. J. Zool., 20 (supplement): 215-221.
• 19- Koç K. ve Ayyıldız, N. 1997. Türkiye faunası için yeni stigmaeid akarlar (Acari, Prostigmata, Stigmaeidae). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 21, 445-459.
• 20- Meyer, M.K.P. (Smith). 1987. African Tetranychidae (Acari: Prostigmata). Entomology Mem. Department of Agriculture Techechnical Service, Republic of South Africa, 69, 175 pp.
• 21- Migeon, A., Nouguier E. and Dorkeld, F. 2011. Spider Mites Web: a comprehensive database for the Tetranychidae. Trends in Acarology: 557-560, (http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/CBGP/spmweb/).
• 22- Özbek, H., Güçlü, Ş. ve Tozlu, G. 1996. Erzurum, Erzincan, Bayburt ve Artvin illerinde Kuşburnu Bitkisinde Zararlı olan Anthropoda Türleri. Kuşburnu Sempozyumu 5-6 Eylül, Gümüşhane, 219-230.
• 23- Özbek, H. and Çalmaşur, O. 2005. A review of insects and mites associated with roses in Turkey. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.690.25
• 24- Pritchard, A.E. & Baker, E.W. 1955. A revision of the spider mite family Tetranychidae. Memoirs Series, San Francisco, Pacific Coast Entomological Society, 2: 472 p.
• 25- Pritchard, A.E. and Baker, E.W. 1958. The False Spider Mites (Acarina: Tenuipalpidae) University of California Publications in Entomology Vol. 14 No.3, 175–274 pp.
• 26- Tuttle, D.M. & Baker, E.W. 1968. Spider mites of Southwestern United States and a revision of the Family Tetranychidae. TheUniversity of Arizona Press, Tuscon-Arizona, U.S.A. 143 pp.
• 27- Urhan, R. & Ayyıldız, N. 1993. Türkiye faunası için yeni bir Prozercon Sellnick, 1943 (Acari, Mesostigmata, Zerconidae) türü. Doğa-Tr. J.of Zoology, 17(1): 83-89.
• 28- Urhan, R. & Ekiz, A.N. 2002. Systematic studies on zerconid mites (Acari:Gamasida, Zerconidae) of Turkey. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 48 (3): 225-235.