ABSTRACT
Aim: Pain is the major problem early postoperative period after perianal operations. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of adding 50 μg or 100 μg of morphine on intrathecal 5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine on postoperative analgesia before anal surgery.
Material and Method: A total of 60 patients divided into 3 groups, including 20 patients in each group, were included for the study; Group 1: 5 mg 0.5% heavy bupivacaine (HB), Group 2: 5 mg 0.5% HB and 50 μg Morphine, Group 3: 5 mg 0.5% HB and 100 μg Morphine was intrathecally administered. Intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics, time to urination and first analgesia requirement, perioperative and postoperative side effects were recorded
Results: The time to first analgesic need in Group 1 (305.40 ± 143.86) was statistically significantly lower than Group 2 (435.50 ± 171.70) and Group 3 (435.50 ± 156.08) was determined (p=0.015). No significant difference was found between urinary retention (p>0.05). It was determined that the postoperative nausea and vomiting percentages (25.0%) in Group 3 were statistically significantly higher than Group 2 (5.0%) and Group 1 (0.0%) (p<0.05).
Conclusions: The use of 50 μg of intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing perianal surgery in saddle block anesthesia has the expected effect on postoperative analgesia and it is considered appropriate to be preferred in perianal surgery because it causes minimal adverse side effects.
HERHANGİ BİR MALİ DESTEK ALINMAMIŞTIR.
YOK
Acknowledgements.—We would like to thank Assoc. Prof. Dr. Esra OZAYAR ( Chief of Anesthesiology Clinic, University of Healh Science, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital) and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hakan BULUS ( Chief of General Surgery Clinic, University of Healh Science, Kecioren Training and Research Hospital ) for permissions and supports in our study. We also thank all the volunteers who participated in our study.
YOK
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Subjects | Health Care Administration |
Journal Section | Research Articles |
Authors | |
Project Number | YOK |
Publication Date | April 24, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 2 |
TR DİZİN ULAKBİM and International Indexes (1b)
Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS]
Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.
You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/3449/file/4924/show
Journal Indexes and Platforms:
TR Dizin ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, Crossref, Worldcat (OCLC), DRJI, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Turkiye Citation Index, Turk Medline, ROAD, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, ASOS Index, General Impact Factor, Scilit.The indexes of the journal's are;
The platforms of the journal's are;
The indexes/platforms of the journal are;
TR Dizin Ulakbim, Crossref (DOI), Google Scholar, EuroPub, Directory of Research Journal İndexing (DRJI), Worldcat (OCLC), OpenAIRE, ASOS Index, ROAD, Turkiye Citation Index, ICI World of Journal's, Index Copernicus, Turk Medline, General Impact Factor, Scilit
EBSCO, DOAJ, OAJI is under evaluation.
Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review"