<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>acta med nicomedia</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Acta Medica Nicomedia</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">2717-8994</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2717-8994</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Kocaeli Üniversitesi</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.53446/actamednicomedia.1846958</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Radiology and Organ Imaging</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Radyoloji ve Organ Görüntüleme</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>IN VIVO QUANTITATIVE ULTRASOUND IMAGING ON SKIN FOR NON-INVASIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF BREAST CANCER RELATED LYMPHEDEMA</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="tr">
                                    <trans-title>MEME KANSERİYLE İLİŞKİLİ LENFÖDEMİN İNVAZİV OLMAYAN KARAKTERİZASYONU İÇİN CİLTTE İN VİVO KANTİTATİF ULTRASON GÖRÜNTÜLEME</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3284-6169</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Demirkan</surname>
                                    <given-names>İrem</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>BAHÇEŞEHİR ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20260310">
                    <day>03</day>
                    <month>10</month>
                    <year>2026</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>9</volume>
                                                    <fpage>1</fpage>
                                        <lpage>8</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20251222">
                        <day>12</day>
                        <month>22</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20260120">
                        <day>01</day>
                        <month>20</month>
                        <year>2026</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2020, Acta Medica Nicomedia</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Acta Medica Nicomedia</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Objective: To study the potential of in vivo quantitative ultrasound (QUS) imaging using Rényi Entropy (RE) and attenuation coefficient measurements for non-invasive characterization of skin tissue variations in breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Methods: Ultrasound radiofrequency (RF) signals recorded from the skin tissue of the arm in five women with Stage II BCRL and five healthy individuals as controls were analyzed. RE was computed from the RF data to quantify tissue heterogeneity, while the attenuation coefficient was estimated using the spectral-log difference method. Corresponding B-mode images were used for anatomical reference, and statistical comparisons were performed between two groups. Results: Both RE and attenuation coefficient values were significantly lower in lymphedematous dermis than in healthy skin (p&amp;lt;0.01), showing decreased signal complexity and changed acoustic scatterer characteristics associated with lymphatic fluid accumulation. Furthermore, the attenuation coefficients from healthy skin dermis fall into the same range as previously reported values, thus confirming the measurement approach. Spatially quantitative distributions were further demonstrated by parametric mapping of entropy and attenuation, enabling robust differentiation between control subjects and patients with BCRL. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that the joint analysis of entropy and attenuation-based quantitative ultrasound metrics is sensitive to edema-related changes in the dermal microstructure of BCRL, detecting changes that are not readily discernible in conventional qualitative B-mode imaging. QUS-derived metrics provide complementary insight into tissue heterogeneity and acoustic energy loss at the microtissue level, whereas B-mode principally offers macroscopic anatomical information.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="tr">
                            <p>Amaç: Meme kanseriyle ilişkili lenfödemde deri dokusu varyasyonlarını invaziv olmayan bir şekilde karakterize etmek için Rényi Entropisi (RE) ve zayıflama katsayısı ölçümlerini kullanarak in vivo kantitatif ultrason görüntülemenin potansiyelini incelemek. Yöntem: Evre II meme kanseri kaynaklı lenfödemli beş kadın ve kontrol grubu olarak beş sağlıklı bireyin kol deri dokusundan kaydedilen ultrason radyo frekansı (RF) sinyalleri analiz edildi. Doku heterojenliğini ölçmek için RF verilerinden RE hesaplandı, zayıflama katsayısı ise spektral-logaritmik fark yöntemi kullanılarak tahmin edildi. Anatomik referans için karşılık gelen B-mod görüntüleri kullanıldı ve iki grup arasında istatistiksel karşılaştırmalar yapıldı. Bulgular: Hem RE hem de zayıflama katsayısı değerleri, lenfödemli dermiste sağlıklı deriye göre anlamlı derecede daha düşüktü (p&amp;lt;0,01), bu da lenfatik sıvı birikimiyle ilişkili olarak sinyal karmaşıklığında azalma ve akustik saçıcı özelliklerinde değişiklik olduğunu gösterdi. Ayrıca, sağlıklı deri dermisinden elde edilen zayıflama katsayıları, daha önce bildirilen değerlerle aynı aralığa düşmektedir, bu da ölçüm yaklaşımını doğrulamaktadır. Entropi ve zayıflamanın parametrik haritalanmasıyla mekansal olarak nicel dağılımlar daha da gösterilmiş ve kontrol denekleri ile lenfödemli hastalar arasında sağlam bir ayrım yapılması sağlanmıştır. Sonuç: Bu çalışmanın bulguları, entropi ve zayıflamaya dayalı nicel ultrason metriklerinin ortak analizinin, lenfödemin dermal mikro yapısındaki ödemle ilgili değişikliklere duyarlı olduğunu ve geleneksel nitel B-mod görüntülemede kolayca ayırt edilemeyen değişiklikleri tespit ettiğini göstermiştir. Nicel ultrason kaynaklı metrikler, doku heterojenliği ve mikro doku düzeyinde akustik enerji kaybı hakkında tamamlayıcı bilgiler sağlarken, B-mod esas olarak makroskopik anatomik bilgiler sunmaktadır.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Ultrasound</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Lymphedema</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Breast Cancer</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Rényi Entropy</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Attenuation of Skin</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="tr">
                                                    <kwd>Ultrason</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Lenfödem</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Meme Kanseri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Rényi Entropisi</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Ciltte Zayıflama.</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer in women: burden and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017;26(4):444-457. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Josephine SP. Evaluation of lymphedema prevention protocol on quality of life among breast cancer patients with mastectomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019;20(10):3077. doi:10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.10.3077</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lawenda BD, Mondry TE, Johnstone PAS. Lymphedema: a primer on the identification and management of a chronic condition in oncologic treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59(1):8-24. doi:10.3322/caac.20001</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Warren AG, Brorson H, Borud LJ, Slavin SA. Lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;59(4):464-472. doi:10.1097/01.sap.0000257149.42922.7e</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mortimer PS. The pathophysiology of lymphedema. Cancer. 1998;83(S12B):2798-2802. doi:10.1002/(SICI)10970142(19981215)83:12B+%3C2798::AIDCNCR28%3E3.0.CO;2-E.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Frattolin J, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of breast cancer-related lymphoedema due to treatment combinations. medRxiv. 2025. doi:10.1101/2025.06.11.25329404</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pappalardo M, et al. Breast cancer-related lymphedema: recent updates on diagnosis, severity and available treatments. J Pers Med. 2021;11(5):402. doi:10.3390/jpm11050402</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mellor RH, et al. Dual-frequency ultrasound examination of skin and subcutis thickness in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast J. 2004;10(6):496-503. doi:10.1111/j.1075-122X.2004.21458.x</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ren X, Li L. Magnetic resonance imaging in lymphedema: opportunities, challenges, and future perspectives. Magn Reson Imaging. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2025.110461</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akita S, et al. Noninvasive screening test for detecting early stage lymphedema using follow-up computed tomography imaging after cancer treatment and results of treatment with lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Microsurgery. 2017;37(8):910-916. doi:10.1002/micr.30188</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Suehiro K, et al. Significance of ultrasound examination of skin and subcutaneous tissue in secondary lower extremity lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2013;6(2):180-188. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.12.00102</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rockson SG. Ultrasonography in the evaluation of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Lymphat Res Biol. 2016;14(1):1. doi:10.1089/lrb.2016.28999.sgr</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yusof KM, et al. Assessment of potential risk factors and skin ultrasound presentation associated with breast cancer-related lymphedema in long-term breast cancer survivors. Diagnostics. 2021;11(8):1303. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11081303</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Oelze ML, Mamou J. Review of quantitative ultrasound: envelope statistics and backscatter coefficient imaging and contributions to diagnostic ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016;63(2):336-351. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2015.2513958</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yao LX, Zagzebski JA, Madsen EL. Backscatter coefficient measurements using a reference phantom to extract depth-dependent instrumentation factors. Ultrason Imaging. 1990;12(1):58-70. doi:10.1016/0161-7346(90)90221-I</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kanayama Y, et al. Real-time ultrasound attenuation imaging of diffuse fatty liver disease. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(4):692-705. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2012.10.021</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Labuda C, et al. Two-dimensional mapping of the ultrasonic attenuation and speed of sound in brain. Ultrasonics. 2022;124:106742. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2022.106742</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lizzi FL, et al. Relationship of ultrasonic spectral parameters to features of tissue microstructure. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1987;34(3):319-329. doi:10.1109/T-UFFC.1987.26950</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tehrani AKZ, et al. Ultrasound scatterer density classification using convolutional neural networks and patch statistics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021;68(8):2697-2706. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2021.3075912</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhou Z, et al. Scatterer size estimation for ultrasound tissue characterization: a survey. Measurement. 2024;225:114046. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2023.114046</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mamou J, Oelze ML, eds. Quantitative Ultrasound in Soft Tissues. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2013. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6952-6</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tsui PH, et al. Small-window parametric imaging based on information entropy for ultrasound tissue characterization. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41004. doi:10.1038/srep41004</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vujasic R. Matched reassignment of the ultrasound data of breast lesions. Bachelor’s thesis. 2022.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhou Z, et al. Entropic imaging of cataract lens: an in vitro study. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96195. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096195</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tsui PH, et al. Small-window parametric imaging based on information entropy for ultrasound tissue characterization. Sci Rep. 2017;7:41004. doi:10.1038/srep41004</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fang J, Ting YN, Chen YW. Quantitative assessment of lung ultrasound grayscale images based on Shannon entropy for the detection of pulmonary aeration: an animal study. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(7):1699-1711. doi:10.1002/jum.15851</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rényi A. On measures of entropy and information. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1961:547-562.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fornage BD, McGavran MH, Duvic M, Waldron CA. Imaging of the skin with 20-MHz US. Radiology. 1993;189(1):69-76. doi:10.1148/radiology.189.1.8372222</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cammarota T, Pinto F, Magliaro A, Sarno A. Current uses of diagnostic high-frequency US in dermatology. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(Suppl):S215-S223. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00065-5</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Olerud JE, O&#039;Brien WD Jr, Riederer-Henderson MA, et al. Ultrasonic assessment of skin and wounds with the scanning laser acoustic microscope. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88(5):615-623. doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470221</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Moran CM, Bush NL, Bamber JC. Ultrasonic propagation properties of excised human skin. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1995;21(9):1177-1190. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(95)00049-6</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bhagat PK, Kerrick W, Ware RW. Ultrasonic characterization of aging in skin tissue. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1980;6(4):369-375. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(80)90006-X</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cantrell JH Jr, Goans RE, Roswell RL. Acoustic impedance variations at burn–nonburn interfaces in porcine skin. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;64(3):731-735. doi:10.1121/1.382037</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Forster FK, Olerud JE, Riederer-Henderson MA, Holmes AW. Ultrasonic assessment of skin and surgical wounds utilizing backscatter acoustic techniques to estimate attenuation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16(1):43-53. doi:10.1016/0301-5629(90)90085-Q</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Guittet C, Ossant F, Remenieras JP, Pourcelot L, Berson M. High-frequency estimation of the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient slope obtained in human skin: simulation and in vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999;25(3):421-429. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(98)00176-8</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Raju BI, Srinivasan MA. High-frequency ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter coefficients of in vivo normal human dermis and subcutaneous fat. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(11):1543-1556. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00456-2</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Raju BI, Swindells KJ, Gonzalez S, Srinivasan MA. Quantitative ultrasonic methods for characterization of skin lesions in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(6):825-838. doi:10.1016/S0301-5629(03)00009-7</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Omura M, Yoshida K, Akita S, Yamaguchi T. High-frequency ultrasonic backscatter coefficient analysis considering microscopic acoustic and histopathological properties of lymphedema dermis. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2020;59:SKKE15. doi:10.35848/1347-4065/ab86da</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Goudarzi S, et al. Segmentation of arm ultrasound images in breast cancer-related lymphedema: a database and deep learning algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2023;70(9):2552-2563. doi:10.1109/TBME.2023.3253646</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hashemi HS, et al. Assessment of mechanical properties of tissue in breast cancer-related lymphedema using ultrasound elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019;66(3):541-550. doi:10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2876056</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Christensen AM, Rosado-Mendez IM, Hall TJ. A systematized review of quantitative ultrasound based on first-order speckle statistics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2024;71(7):872-886.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Suehiro K, et al. Skin and subcutaneous tissue ultrasonography features in breast cancer-related lymphedema. Ann Vasc Dis. 2016;9(4):312-316. doi:10.3400/avd.oa.16-00086</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3):379-423.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hughes MS. Analysis of ultrasonic waveforms using Shannon entropy. In: IEEE 1992 Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. IEEE; 1992:1205-1209. doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.1992.275884</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smolíková R, Wachowiak MP, Zurada JM. An information-theoretic approach to estimating ultrasound backscatter characteristics. Comput Biol Med. 2004;34(4):355-370. doi:10.1016/S0010-4825(03)00072-6</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gao R, et al. Ultrasound normalized cumulative residual entropy imaging: theory, methodology, and application. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024;256:108374. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108374</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Omura M, et al. Frequency dependence of attenuation and backscatter coefficient of ex vivo human lymphedema dermis. J Med Ultrason. 2020;47(1):25-34. doi:10.1007/s10396-019-00973-z</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Van den Aarssen M, Verhoef WA, Thijssen JM. Influence of absorbing and scattering media on the propagation of ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989;85(2):567-575. doi:10.1121/1.397580</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Frem HS, Giblin RA. The choice of ultrasound frequency for skin blood flow investigation. Bioeng Skin. 1985;1(3):193-205.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
