<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article         dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>lisans</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2147-6020</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Mehmet KURUDAYIOĞLU</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16916/aded.93491</article-id>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <title-group>
                                                                                                                                                            <article-title>Söylemin Düzeyleri: Yapı, Süreç ve Dünya Bilgileri Çerçevesinde Metni Anlamak</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Ensar</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ferhat</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20140628">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>28</month>
                    <year>2014</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>2</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>89</fpage>
                                        <lpage>95</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20140628">
                        <day>06</day>
                        <month>28</month>
                        <year>2014</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2013, Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>The contribution of experience and open-teaching in teaching certain types of rhetoric and in this sense, assessment of studies conducted about the functions of experience and openteaching have not yet concluded with an experimental result. In years, different instructional approaches have produced diverse results. Even these approaches have reflected different sides of assessment and interacted with different paradigms including seeing literacy from an social activity to a cognitive skill. Based on the history of experimental studies conducted about understanding from text and the results of analyzing the interactions among various cognitive scientists, it has been suggested to reorganize both the structural and functional perspective of texts. Therefore, determining the developments of the main points for comprehending texts and also deciding how to support the points that are less developed require us to apply to research methods. Thus, the aim of this study is a) to list the primitive topics in text comprehension and b) to lead a discussion including the main steps of text comprehension in order to improve theoretical understanding.</p></trans-abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <abstract><p>Söylemin belli biçimlerinin öğretilmesi açısından deneyim ve açık öğretimin sağladığı kolaylıklar ve bu bağlamda da üstlendiği işlevler konusundaki çalışmalar hakkında yapılmış değerlendirmeler henüz deneysel içerikli bir sonuca kavuşturulamamıştır. Yıllar içerisinde farklı öğretim yaklaşımları farklı sonuçlar vermiştir. Hatta bu yaklaşımlar, değerlendirmelerin farklı uçlarını yansıtmış ve sosyal bir uygulama olarak okur-yazarlıktan bilişsel bir beceri olarak okuryazarlığa kadar birçok farklı kuramsal bakış açısıyla da etkileşmiştir. Metinden anlama sürecindeki deneysel araştırmanın tarihsel geçmişi ve bilişsel bilimin başlıca savunuları arasındaki etkileşimin ayrıntılı bir analizinden doğan sonuçlardan hareketle metinlerin gerek yapısal gerekse işlevsel açılardan birtakım düzenlemelerden geçirilmesi önerilmektedir. Bu nedenle, metni kavramanın temel yönlerini anlamada ne tür gelişmeler kaydedildiğini saptamak ve daha az gelişme olan alanlar üzerinde ise ileri araştırmaların nasıl gerçekleştirilmesi gerektiği konusunda zengin çıkarımlara yol açabilecek durumdaki bir işleyişin yöntem bilgilerine başvurmak gerekmektedir. Dolayısıyla bu araştırma örneği çerçevesinde, birincil önemdeki konuların listelenmesi ve kuramsal çerçevenin geçmişten günümüze gelen etkileri bağlamında söz konusu alanlarda ilerleme sağlamanın temel koşulu durumundaki işlem basamaklarının tanıtılması önemli görülmektedir.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Zihinsel çıkarımlar</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   metin kavrama</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   bellek yapısı</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   bilgi işleme</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   metinden öğrenme.</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Mental inferences</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   text comprehension</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   memory structure</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   information processing</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>   learning from text.</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ashcraft, M.H. (2002). Cognition (3rd Ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Balcı, A. (2013). Okuma ve Anlama Eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bartlett, F.C. (1950). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, Eng.: The University Press (Reprented).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Berman, R.A. &amp; Nir-sagiv, B. (2007). Comparing Narrative and Expository Text Construction Across Adolescence: A Developmental Paradox. Discourse Processes, 43 (2), 79-120.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Britton, B.K. &amp; Black, J.B. (1985). Understanding expository text: From structure to process and world knowledge. In B.K. Britton &amp; J.B. Black (Eds.). Understanding expository text: A theoretical and practical handbook for analyzing explanatory text. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Britton, B.K., Glynn, S.M., Meyer, B.J.F. &amp; Penland, M.J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51-61.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cook, A.E. &amp; Myers, J.L. (2004). Processing discourse roles in scripted narratives: the ınfluences of context world knowledge. Journal of Memory and Language, (50), 268–288.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dirven, René (2002). Cognitive Linguistics. In. The Linguistics Encylopedia (Second Edition). Kırsten Malmkjær (edt.). NY: Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ensar, F. (2009). Retorik Yapı Kuramının Açıklayıcı Metinler Örneğinde Bir Uygulaması. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Türkçe Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Ankara.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Graesser, A.C., Hoffman, N.L. &amp; Clark, L.F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,19, 135–51.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hançerlioğlu, O. (2002). Felsefe Sözlüğü. Remzi Kitabevi.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Just, M.A. &amp; Carpenter, P. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Just, M.A. &amp; Carpenter, P.A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kintsch, W. (1974). The Represantation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A Construction-Integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kintsch, W. &amp; Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward A Model of Text Comprehension and Production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-94.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Loftus, E.F. &amp; Palmer, J.C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 585-589.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lorch, R.F. &amp; van Den Broek, P. (1997). Understrstanding reading comprehension: Current and future contributions of cognitive science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, (22). 213-246.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MacDonald, M.C. &amp; Christiansen, M.H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). Psychological Review, (109), 1, 35–54.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mannes, S.M. &amp; Kintsch, W. (1987). Knowledge organization and text organization. Cognition and Instruction, 4(2), 91-115.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Mckoon, G. &amp; Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99, 440-466.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özbay, M., Bağcı, H. ve Uyar, Y. (2008). Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Okuma Tutumlarının Çeşitli Değişkenlere Göre Değerlendirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (9), 15, 117-136.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rumelhart, D. E. (2004). Toward an interactive model of reading. In Robert B. Ruddell et al. (Eds.). Theoretical Models And Processes Of Reading, (Fifth Edition): International Reading Association, Newark, DE. Searle, J. (2005). Akıllar, Beyinler ve Bilim. (Çev., Kemal Bek). İstanbul: Say Yayınları. van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Waters, G.S. &amp; Caplan, D. (1996). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: Critique of Just and Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103, 761–772.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wood, D. (2003). Çocuklarda düşünme ve öğrenme (Çev., Mine Özünlü). Doruk Yayıncılık.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
