Yaşlılarda Düşme Riski ile İlgili Faktörler

Abstract

Amaç: Düşme yaşlı yetişkinlerde çok yaygın olarak görülen önemli bir problemdir. Çalışmanın amacı, yaşlı bireylerde düşme riski ile ilgili faktörleri incelemektir. Araçlar ve Yöntem: Çalışmada 65 yaş üstü 110 birey incelendi. Bireylerin demografik bilgileri ve son 1 yıl içerisindeki düşme sayıları kaydedildi. Katılımcıların bilişsel becerileri Montreal Bilişsel Değerlendirme (MoCa) Ölçeği ile, anteriyoposterior dinamik denge Fonksiyonel Uzanma Testi (FUT) ile, lateral denge Tandem Duruş Testi (TDT) ile, denge ve düşme olasılığı Berg Denge Testi (BDT), fonksiyonel hareketlilik Zamanlı Kalk Yürü Testi (ZKYT) ile, alt ekstermite enduransı ve fonksiyonel kas gücü 1-Dakikalık otur-kalk Tesi (1-DOKT) ile ve servikal propriosepsiyon stabilizatör ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Katılımcıların yaş ortalaması 71.26±6.20'dir ve son bir yıl içinde 0.41±1.02 düşme yaşamışlardır. TDT süresi: 25.95±7.93 saniye, MoCa: 18.65±4.90, FUT: 21.83±8.38 cm, BDT: 51.11±4.47, ZKYT: 12.01±3.89 saniye, 1-DOKT: 18,61±8,23 tekrar, servikal propriyosepsiyon hatası: % 15.49±13.01 olarak bulundu. Düşme sayısı ile yaş (r=-0.081, p=0.399), boy (r=-0.030, p=0.756), TDT (r=0.144, p=0.134), bilişsel düzey (r=-0.015, p=0.878), BBT(r=-0.079, p=0.414) ve servikal propriyosepsiyon(r=-0.135, p=0.160) arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olmayan negatif bir korelasyon görüldü. Erkekler kadınlara kıyasla daha fazla düşme bildirmiştir ve olasılık oranı 3.14'tür (%95 güven aralığı: 1.21-8.14). Sonuç: Bu çalışma, yaşlı insanlar arasında düşmelerle ilişkili faktörlere dair değerli bilgiler sunmaktadır. Bulgular, düşmelerde kilit bir faktör olarak cinsiyetin önemini göstermekte ve vücut ağırlığı, denge, servikal propriosepsiyon ve yaşın düşme olasılığı üzerindeki olası etkisini ortaya koymaktadır.

Keywords

• denge
• düşme
• propriyosepsiyon
• yaşlı

Factors Associated with Fall Risk in the Elderly

Abstract

Purpose: Falls are a significant health concern for older adults. This study aimed to investigate factors influencing fall risk in elderly individuals. Materials and Methods: A total of 110 participants aged 65 and older were evaluated. Data on demographic characteristics and the number of falls in the past year were recorded. Various physical and cognitive assessments were conducted, including the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for cognitive abilities, Functional Reach Test (FRT) for anteroposterior balance, Tandem Stance Test (TST) for lateral balance, Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for overall balance, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) for functional mobility, 1-Minute Sit-to-Stand Test (1-MST) for lower extremity strength, and cervical proprioception measurements. Results: Participants had a mean age of 71.26±6.20 years and experienced 0.41±1.02 falls in the past year. The following mean values were observed: TST time: 25.95±7.93 seconds, MoCA: 18.65±4.90, FRT: 21.83±8.38 cm, BBT: 51.11±4.47, TUG: 12.01±3.89 seconds, 1-MSTST: 18.61±8.23 repetitions, and cervical proprioception error: 15.49±13.01%. No statistically significant correlation was found between fall frequency and age (r=-0.081, p=0.399), height (r=-0.030, p=0.756), TST (r=0.144, p=0.134), cognitive level (r=-0.015, p=0.878), BBT (r=-0.079, p=0.414), and cervical proprioception (r=-0.135, p=0.160). Men reported more falls than women, with an odds ratio of 3.14 (95% CI: 1.21-8.14). Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the factors associated with falls among older adults. The findings highlight the importance of gender as a key factor in falls and reveal the potential influence of body weight, balance, cervical proprioception, and age on fall risk.

Keywords

• balance
• elderly
• fall
• proprioception

References

1. 1. World Health Organization (WHO). Ageing. https://www.who.int/health-topics/ageing#tab=tab_1. Accessed October 21, 2023.
2. 2. TÜİK Kurumsal. İstatsitiklerler Yaşlışar, 2022. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=İstatistiklerle-Yaşlılar-2022-49667&dil=1. Accessed October 21, 2023.
3. 3. Vaishya R, Vaish A. Falls in Older Adults are Serious. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(1):69-74.
4. 4. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle characteristics associated with impaired balance and functional ability in older people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(12):1546-1552.
5. 5. Henry M, Baudry S. Age-related changes in leg proprioception: implications for postural control. J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2019;122(2):525-538.
6. 6. Lin G, Zhao X, Wang W, Wilkinson T. The relationship between forward head posture, postural control and gait: A systematic review. Gait Posture. 2022;98:316-329.
7. 7. Lansade C, Laporte S, Thoreux P, Rousseau MA, Skalli W, Lavaste F. Three-dimensional analysis of the cervical spine kinematics: effect of age and gender in healthy subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(26):2900-2906.
8. 8. Hsu CL, Nagamatsu LS, Davis JC, Liu-Ambrose T. Examining the relationship between specific cognitive processes and falls risk in older adults: A systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2012;23(10):2409-2424.

9. 9. Al-Yahya E, Dawes H, Smith L, Dennis A, Howells K, Cockburn J. Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(3):715-728.
10. 10. Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51-61.
11. 11. Ozdilek, B., & Kenangil G. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA-TR) in Patients With Parkinson’s Disease. Clin Neuropsychol. 2014;28(2):333-343.
12. 12. Williams B, Allen B, Hu Z, et al. Real-time fall risk assessment using functional reach test. Int J Telemed Appl. 2017;2017(1):2042974.
13. 13. Rosa MV, Perracini MR, Ricci NA. Usefulness, assessment and normative data of the Functional Reach Test in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;81:149-170.
14. 14. Lord SR, Rogers MW, Howland A, Fitzpatrick R. Lateral Stability, Sensorimotor Function and Falls in Older People. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999;47(9):1077-1081.
15. 15. Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559-566.
16. 16. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up and go test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903.
17. 17. Bohannon RW. Measurement of sit-to-stand among older adults. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2012;28(1):11-16.
18. 18. Treleaven J. Sensorimotor disturbances in neck disorders affecting postural stability, head and eye movement control. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):2-11.
19. 19. Sebastiani C, Wong JYX, Litt A, et al. Mapping sex and gender differences in falls among older adults: A scoping review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024;72(3):903-915.
20. 20. Lin YC, Tseng IJ, Lu YC, et al. Muscle mass and gait characteristics in older women fallers vs. Non-fallers. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17):3924.
21. 21. Nascimento M de M, Gouveia ÉR, Gouveia BR, et al. Sex Differences in Falls: The Mediating Role of Gait Stability Ratio and Body Balance in Vulnerable Older Adults. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):450.
22. 22. Chang VC, Do MT. Risk factors for falls among seniors: Implications of gender. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(7):521-531.
23. 23. Xu Q, Ou X, Li J. The risk of falls among the aging population: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10:902599.
24. 24. Ambrose AF, Paul G, Hausdorff JM. Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature. Maturitas. 2013;75(1):51-61.
25. 25. Lockhart TE, Frames CW, Soangra R, Lieberman A. Effects of Obesity and Fall Risk on Gait and Posture of Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Int J Progn Health Manag. 2019;10(1):019.
26. 26. Lee YY, Chen CL, Lee IC, Lee IC, Chen NC. History of falls, dementia, lower education levels, mobility limitations, and aging are risk factors for falls among the community-dwelling elderly: A cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(17):9356.
27. 27. Muir SW, Gopaul K, Montero Odasso MM. The role of cognitive impairment in fall risk among older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2012;41(3):299-308.
28. 28. Beck Jepsen D, Robinson K, Ogliari G, et al. Predicting falls in older adults: an umbrella review of instruments assessing gait, balance, and functional mobility. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):615.
29. 29. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther. 2000;80(9):896-903.
30. 30. Gbiri CA, Fabunmi AA. Gender influence on balance performances in the elderly. S Afr J Physiother. 2006;62(3):17-20.
31. 31. Mohammed R, Basha ASK, Jungade S. Influence of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index on Balance and Mobility Performance in Indian Community-Dwelling Older People. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2020;39(2):144-156.
32. 32. Thomas E, Battaglia G, Patti A, et al. Physical activity programs for balance and fall prevention in elderly: A systematic review. Medicine. 2019;98(27):1-9.
33. 33. Bohannon RW, Crouch R. 1-Minute Sit-To-Stand Test: Systematic Review Of Procedures, Performance, And Clinimetric Properties. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2019;39(1):2-8.
34. 34. Muehlbauer T, Gollhofer A, Granacher U. Associations Between Measures of Balance and Lower-Extremity Muscle Strength/Power in Healthy Individuals Across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(12):1671-1692.
35. 35. Reddy RS, Alkhamis BA, Kirmani JA, et al. Age-Related Decline in Cervical Proprioception and Its Correlation with Functional Mobility and Limits of Stability Assessed Using Computerized Posturography: A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing Older (65+ Years) and Younger Adults. Healthcare (Switzerland). 2023;11(13):1924.