Research Article

Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method

Volume: 2 Number: 3 December 29, 2018
TR EN

Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method

Abstract

PurposeGastrostomy for enteral nutrition is often performed endoscopically. If an endoscope or other instruments are not available or a pharyngoesophageal obstruction is seen, an open gastronomy technique can beuseful under local anesthesia using minilaparotomy. In this study, we aim to present the feasibility and reliability of this old method when needed.

Materials and Methods: Twenty-eight patients were operated on using this old technique. The operations were performed under local anesthesia with a mini vertical incision (2-3 cm) just below the xiphoid process. A gastrostomy tube was inserted through the gastric wall under direct vision after the gastrotomy. The gastric wall was fastened with double-purse string sutures. The tube was taken out from the left subcostal gastric wall. All the data were evaluated retrospectively.

Results: A tube gastrostomy was performed easily and safely in all patients under local anesthesia by way of a minilaparotomy. There were no observed complications. The mean operative time was 36.07 ± 10.18 minutes and all the patients tolerated feeding within 24 hours of the operation.

Conclusion: A tube gastrostomy can be performed safely and easily under local anesthesia by way of a minilaparotomy when necessary. We can use this old technique when we don’t have an endoscope, other instruments or in case of an esophageal obstruction. Although this technique is safe and easy to perform, endoscopic methods should be used for tube gastrostomies.  

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Braga M, Gianotti L, Vignali A, Cestari A, Bisagni P, Di Carlo V. Artificial nutrition after major abdominal surgery: impact of route of administration and composition of the diet. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(1):24-302. Gianotti L, Braga M, Gentilini O, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Di Carlo V. Artificial nutrition after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreas. 2000;21(4):344-351.3. Hossein SM, Leili M, Hossein AM.Acceptability and outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement and patient quality of life. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2011;22(2):128-1334. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15(6):872-8755. Klose J, Heldwein W, Rafferzeder M et al. Nutritional status and quality of life in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) inpractice: prospective one-year follow-up. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48: 2057-20636. Loser C, Wolters S, Folsch UR. Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43: 2549-25577. Vassilopoulos PP, Filopoulos E, Kelessis N, Gontikakis M, Plataniotis G.Competentgastrostomy for patients with head and neck cancer. Support Care Cancer. 1998;6(5):479-4818. Bach JR, Gonzalez M, Sharma A, Swan K, Patel A. Open Gastrostomy for Noninvasive Ventilation Users with Neuromuscular Disease Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(1):1-69. Faria GR, Taveira-Gomes A Open gastrostomy by mini- laparotomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2011;9(3):263-26610. Zickler RW, Barbagiovanni JT, Swan KG. A simplified open gastrostomy under local anesthesia. Am Surg. 2001;67(8):806-80811. Foutch PG, Woods CA, Talbert GA, Sanowski RA. A critical analysis of the Sacks-Vine gastrostomy tube: a review of 120 consecutive procedures. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83(8):812-81512. Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987;93(1):48-52.13. Miller RE, Castlemain B, Lacqua FJ, Kotler DP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Results in 316 patients and review of literature. Surg Endosc. 1989;3(4):186-19014. Ponsky JL, Gauderer MW, Stellato TA, Aszodi A. Percutaneous approaches to enteral alimentation. Am J Surg. 1985;149(1):102-10515. Sangster W, Cuddington GD, Bachulis BL. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Am J Surg. 1988;155(5):677-67916. Alley JB, Corneille MG, Stewart RM, Dent DL. Pneumoperitoneum after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients in the intensive care unit. Am Surg. 2007;73(8):765-76717. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Effectiveness of outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy replacement using esophagogastroduodenoscopy and propofol sedation. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;16;4(2):45-4918. Bankhead RR, Fisher CA, Rolandelli RH. Gastrostomy tube placement outcomes:comparison of surgical, endoscopic, and laparoscopic methods. Nutr Clin Pract. 2005;20(6):607-61219. Ho HS, Ngo H. Gastrostomy for enteral access. A comparison among placement bylaparotomy, laparoscopy, and endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(10):991-99420. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: a prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;27;284(6320):931-93321. Attard JA, MacLean AR. Adhesive small bowel obstruction: epidemiology, biology and prevention. Can J Surg. 2007;50(4):291-30022. Kiatipunsodsai S. Gastrostomy Tube Replacement Using Foley's Catheters in Children. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(3):41-5.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mesut Yur
Türkiye

Erhan Aygen This is me
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 29, 2018

Submission Date

May 7, 2018

Acceptance Date

October 8, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 2 Number: 3

APA
Yur, M., & Aygen, E. (2018). Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method. Ahi Evran Medical Journal, 2(3), 48-52. https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY
AMA
1.Yur M, Aygen E. Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method. Ahi Evran Med J. 2018;2(3):48-52. https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY
Chicago
Yur, Mesut, and Erhan Aygen. 2018. “Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy As an Old Method”. Ahi Evran Medical Journal 2 (3): 48-52. https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY.
EndNote
Yur M, Aygen E (December 1, 2018) Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method. Ahi Evran Medical Journal 2 3 48–52.
IEEE
[1]M. Yur and E. Aygen, “Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method”, Ahi Evran Med J, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 48–52, Dec. 2018, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY
ISNAD
Yur, Mesut - Aygen, Erhan. “Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy As an Old Method”. Ahi Evran Medical Journal 2/3 (December 1, 2018): 48-52. https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY.
JAMA
1.Yur M, Aygen E. Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method. Ahi Evran Med J. 2018;2:48–52.
MLA
Yur, Mesut, and Erhan Aygen. “Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy As an Old Method”. Ahi Evran Medical Journal, vol. 2, no. 3, Dec. 2018, pp. 48-52, https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY.
Vancouver
1.Mesut Yur, Erhan Aygen. Feasibility and Reliability of Open Gastrostomy as an Old Method. Ahi Evran Med J [Internet]. 2018 Dec. 1;2(3):48-52. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA38AR23HY

Ahi Evran Medical Journal  is indexed in ULAKBIM TR Index, Turkish Medline, DOAJ, Index Copernicus, EBSCO and Turkey Citation Index. Ahi Evran Medical Journal is periodical scientific publication. Can not be cited without reference. Responsibility of the articles belong to the authors.

    Creative Commons Lisansı

This journal is licensed under the Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı.